Cognitive Foundations of Ethical Literary Studies

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4312/an.56.1-2.75-89

Keywords:

cognitive literary studies, literary reading, diversity, ethical judgement, aesthetic judgement

Abstract

In the 1980s and 1990s, an ethical turn began to take place in literary studies and in the humanities in general, leading to an increased interest in exploring the relationship between literature and ethics. The field that deals with this topic is now called ethical literary studies or ethical criticism. One of the less explored areas of ethical literary studies is the relationship between ethics and cognitive aspects of reading. In this article, I therefore analyse the neurobiological foundations of literary reading. I consider reading as a technology consisting of various embodied mental, emotional, motor, sensory, memory and other cognitive processes. The temporal and spatial dimension of the processes, which I also call “openness”, is particularly important. The latter conditions the diversity of reading on an experiential level and, finally, the possibilities of the relationship between literature and ethics, namely in relation to literary characters, narratives, implicit and real authors and readers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Armstrong, Paul Buck. “Neuroscience, Narrative and Narratology.” Poetics Today, vol. 40, no. 3, 2019, pp. 395-428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-7558052

Bal, Matthijs, and Martijn Veltkamp. “How Does Fiction Reading Influence Empathy? An Experimental Investigation on the Role of Emotional Transportation.” Plos One, vol. 8, no. 1, 2013, pp. 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055341

Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina, et al. “The Timecourse of Sentence Processing in the Brain.” Neurobiology of Language, edited by Gregory Hickok and Steven Small, Amsterdam, Elsevier, 2016, pp. 607-620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407794-2.00049-3

Bunce, Louise, and John Stansfield. “The Relationship Between Empathy and Reading Fiction: Separate Roles for Cognitive and Affective Components.” Journal of European Psychology Students, vol. 5, no. 3, 2014, pp. 9-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jeps.ca

Chesnokova, Anna, et al. “Cross-Cultural Reader Response to Original and Translated Poetry.” Comparative Literature Studies, vol. 54, no. 4, 2017, pp. 824-849. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5325/complitstudies.54.4.0824

Iser, Wolfgang. The Act of Reading. London, Routledge and Kegan, 1980.

Johnson, Dan R. “Transportation Into a Story Increases Empathy, Prosocial Behavior, and Perceptual Bias Toward Fearful Expressions.” Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 52, no. 2, 2012, pp. 150-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.005

Keen, Suzanne. “Theory of Narrative Empathy.” Narrative, vol. 14, no. 3, 2006, pp. 207-237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2006.0015

Koopman, Eva Maria, and Frank Hakemulder. “Effects of Literature on Empathy and Self-Reflection: A Theoretical-Empirical Framework.” JLT, vol. 9, no. 1, 2015, pp. 70-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jlt-2015-0005

LeDoux, Joseph. “The Emotional Brain, Fear, and the Amygdala.” Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 23, no. 4-5, 2003, pp. 727-738. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025048802629

Louwerse, Max, and Don Kuiken, editors. The Effects of Personal Involvement in Narrative Discourse. London, Routledge, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp3802_1

Mar, Raymond, et al. “Bookworms Versus Nerds: Exposure to Fiction Versus Non-Fiction, Divergent Associations With Social Ability, and the Simulation of Fictional Social Worlds.” Journal of Research in Personality, vol. 40, no. 5, 2006, pp. 694-712. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.002

Mar, Raymond, et al. “Exploring the Link Between Reading Fiction and Empathy: Ruling Out Individual Differences and Examining.” Communications, vol. 34. no. 4, 2009, pp. 407-428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/COMM.2009.025

Miall, Davind, and Don Kuiken. “What is Literariness?” Discourse Processes, vol. 28, no. 2, 2013, pp. 121-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539909545076

Nadeau, Stephen. The Neural Architecture of Grammar. Cambridge, MIT Press, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262017022.001.0001

Oatley, Keith. “A Taxonomy of the Emotions of Literary Response and a Theory of Identification in Fictional Narrative.” Poetics, vol. 23, no. 1-2, 1994, pp. 53-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(94)P4296-S

Phelan, James. Experiencing fiction. Ohio, University Press, 2007.

Piskač, Davor. O književnosti I životu. Zagreb, Hrvatski studiji Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, 2018.

Reichle, Erik D., and Heather Sheridan. “E-Z Reader: An Overview of the Model and Two Recent Applications.” The Oxford Handbook of Reading, edited by Alexander Pollatsek and Rebecca Treiman, Oxford, University Press, 2017, pp. 277-290.

Virk, Tomo. Etični obrat v literarni vedi. Ljubljana, LUD Literatura, 2018.

Wandell, Brian, and Rosemary Le. “Diagnosing the Neural Circuitry of Reading.” Neuron, vol. 96, no. 2, 2017, pp. 298-311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2017.08.007

Downloads

Published

08.12.2023

How to Cite

Žunkovič, I. (2023). Cognitive Foundations of Ethical Literary Studies. Acta Neophilologica, 56(1-2), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.4312/an.56.1-2.75-89

Issue

Section

From Ethical Aspects of Literature to Literary Historical Studies in an Intercultural Context