The Good, the Evil, and the Morally Ambiguous
The Demon Crowley in Terry Pratchett’s and Neil Gaiman’s Postmodern Fantasy Good Omens and Its Television Adaptation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4312/an.57.2.63-74Keywords:
postmodern fantasy, moral ambiguity, intertextuality, adaptationAbstract
In their postmodern fantasy novel Good Omens, Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman create a compelling case for a combination of good and evil in all their characters, but one character is of particular interest: the Demon Crowley. Moral ambiguity marks both the novel and its namesake television series Good Omens. I will examine the moral issues raised by the written and on-screen Crowleys, and the overall understanding the reader or viewer gains of his character. I also examine the intertextual use of the name “Crowley” and its connotations, ending on the question of whether the television series is an effective adaptation of Pratchett’s and Gaiman’s novel and its morally ambiguous message.
Downloads
References
Bortolotti, Gary R. and Linda Hutcheon. “On the Origin of Adaptations: Rethinking Fidelity Discourse and “Success”—Biologically.” New Literary History, vol. 38, 2007, pp. 443-58.
Douglass, Robin. “Hobbes vs. Rousseau: Are We Inherently Evil?” iai News, Issue 17, 2019. https://iai.tv/articles/hobbes-vs-
rousseau-are-we-inherently-evil-or-good-auid-1221.
Good Omens. Directed by Douglas MacKinnon, Amazon Prime Video, 2019.
Gowans, Chris. “Moral Relativism.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2004, 2021. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-relativism. Accessed 31 April. 2024.
Hutcheon, Linda. “On the Art of Adaptation.” Daedalus, vol. 133, no. 2, 2004, pp. 108–11. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/20027920. Accessed 14 Oct. 2020.
Jellenik, Glenn. “The Task of the Adaptation Critic.” South Atlantic Review, vol. 80, no. 3-4, 2015, pp. 254–68. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/soutatlarevi.80.3-4.254. Accessed 14 Oct. 2020.
Johnson, Margaret. “Fallen Faith: Satan as Allegory in Milton’s Paradise Lost.” Scientia in Humanitas: A Journal of Student Research. Vol. 3, 2013, 147-159.
Loke, Andrew Ter Ern. Evil, Sin and Christian Theism. NY: Routledge, 2022.
McFarlane, Brian. “Reading Film and Literature.” The Cambridge Companion to Literature on Screen, edited by Deborah Cartmell and Imelda Whelehan, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007, pp. 15–28. Cambridge Companions to Literature.
Owen, Alex. “The Sorcerer and His Apprentice: Aleister Crowley and the Magical Exploration of Edwardian Subjectivity.” Journal of British Studies, vol. 36, no. 1, 1997, pp. 99–133. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/175904. Accessed 13 Aug. 2021.
Pratchett, Terry, and Neil Gaiman. Good Omens. Gollantz, 2007.
Sanders, Julie. Adaptation and Appropriation, Routledge, 2016.
Taylor, Craig. “Literature, Moral Reflection and Ambiguity.” Philosophy, vol. 86, no. 335, 2011, pp. 75–93. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/23014771.
Urban, Hugh B. “The Beast with Two Backs: Aleister Crowley, Sex Magic and the Exhaustion of Modernity.” Nova Religio: The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions, vol. 7, no. 3, 2004, pp. 7–25. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/nr.2004.7.3.7. Accessed 13 Aug. 2021.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Amy Kennedy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.