Women’s Career Decision Making and Interest in Engineering: A Qualitative Analysis of Influential Personal and Contextual Factors

Concetta Tino; Maria Cristina Lavagnolo; Monica Fedeli; Laura Bierema

doi:10.4312/as/10408

Authors

Concetta Tino University of Padova, Italy
Maria Cristina Lavagnolo University of Padova, Italy
Monica Fedeli University of Padova, Italy
Laura Bierema University of Georgia, Athens, Unites States

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4312/as/10408

Keywords:

women’s career decision making, self-efficacy, social cognitive career theory, environmental engineering education, recognition

Abstract

The aim of the paper was to better understand the influence of personal and contextual factors on women’s career decision making and interest in undergraduate engineering students. On the basis of Social Cognitive Career Theory and utilising a qualitative approach, nine interviews were conducted with women undergraduates at a university in Northern Italy. The results reveal four major aspects: a) the women’s interest in engineering is cultivated by different contextual factors in the same way across multiple cultures; b) self-efficacy affects their interest in engineering; c) this interest is nurtured by internal and external recognition; d) their career decision making is determined by an interdependence of personal and contextual factors. The paper contributes to promoting cultural changes in engineering fields. Some practical implications for education professionals and policy makers were also reported.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Avolio, B., Chávez, J., & Vílchez-Román, C. (2020). Factors that contribute to the underrepresentation of women in science careers worldwide: A literature review. Social Psychology of Education, 23(3), 773–794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-020-09558-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-020-09558-y

Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44, 1175–1184. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.44.9.1175 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175

Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (2019). Social cognitive career theory at 25: Progress in studying the domain satisfaction and career self-management models. Journal of Career Assessment, 27(4), 563–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072719852736 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072719852736

Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237

Eccles, J. S. (2014). Gendered socialization of STEM interests in the family. International Journal of Gender, Science, and Technology, 7(2), 116–132.

Ferry, T. R., Fouad, N. A., & Smith, P. L. (2000). The role of family context in a social cognitive model for career-related choice behavior: A math and science perspective. Journal of vocational behavior, 57(3), 348–364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1999.1743

Haswell, M. M. (2019). Barriers to success: Disadvantages of gender normative language to women in STEM. In Information Resources Management Association (Eds.), Gender and Diversity: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 77–94). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-6912-1.ch005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-6912-1.ch005

Jackson, D., & Bridgstock, R. (2019). Evidencing student success and career outcomes among business and creative industries graduates. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 41(5), 451–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2019.1646377 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2019.1646377

Kim, H., Sefcik, J. S., & Bradway, C. (2017). Characteristics of qualitative descriptive studies: A systematic review. Research in nursing & health, 40(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21768 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21768

Lee, H. S., Flores, L. Y., Navarro, R. L., & Kanagui-Muñoz, M. (2015). A longitudinal test of social cognitive career theory’s academic persistence model among Latino/a and White men and women engineering students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 88, 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.02.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.02.003

Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2013). Social cognitive model of career self-management: Toward a unifying view of adaptive career behavior across the life span. Journal of counseling psychology, 60(4), 557–568. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033446 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033446

Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027

Lent, R. W., Sheu, H. B., Singley, D., Schmidt, J. A., Schmidt, L. C., & Gloster, C. S. (2008). Longitudinal relations of self-efficacy to outcome expectations, interests, and major choice goals in engineering students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(2), 328–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.07.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.07.005

Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). Work motivation and satisfaction: Light at the end of the tunnel. Psychological science, 1(4), 240–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00207.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00207.x

Makarem, Y., & Wang, J. (2020). Career experiences of women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields: A systematic literature review. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 31(1), 91–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21380 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21380

Marra, R. M., Rodgers, K. A., Shen, D., & Bogue, B. (2009). Women engineering students and self-efficacy: A multi-year, multi-institution study of women engineering student self-efficacy. Journal of engineering education, 98(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01003.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01003.x

McKinney, J., Chang, M. L., & Glassmeyer, D. (2021). Why females choose STEM majors: Understanding the relationships between major, personality, interests, self-efficacy, and anxiety. Journal for STEM Education Research, 4, 278–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-021-00050-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-021-00050-6

OECD. (2017). Report on the Gender initiative: Gender equality in education, employment and entrepreneurship. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/education/48111145.pdf

Papafilippou, V., & Bentley, L. (2017). Gendered transitions, career identities and possible selves: The case of engineering graduates. Journal of Education and Work, 30(8), 827–839. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2017.1375088 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2017.1375088

Sandelowski, M. (2010). What’s in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Research in Nursing & Health, 33(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20362 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20362

Tino, C., Frison, D., & Fedeli, M. (2018). Leadership femminile e valore trasformativo dell’esperienza. Educational Reflective Practices, 1, 70–86. https://doi.org/10.3280/ERP2018-001005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3280/ERP2018-001005

Tino, C., Tore, R., & Fedeli, M. (2021). Ingegneria come percorso di studio e di carriera per le studentesse: fattori che ne determinano la scelta. AG AboutGender. International journal of gender studies, 10(19), 240–267. https://doi.org/10.15167/2279-5057/AG2021.10.19.1254