“Leaving No One Behind” As a New Motto for the UN System: Its Impact on Portuguese Adult Education Policy

Rosanna Barros

doi:10.4312/as/16283

Avtorji

Rosanna Barros Univerza v Algarvu, Portugalska

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4312/as/16283

Ključne besede:

globalno upravljanje v izobraževanju, sistem Združenih narodov, Nikogar ne pusti ob strani, izobraževanje odraslih na Portugalskem, kritična analiza politike

Povzetek

Zaradi pojava postsocialne države in specializiranih mednarodno delujočih mrež, kot je nedavno ustanovljena Skupina OZN za trajnostni razvoj, postaja upravljanje na področju izobraževanja vedno bolj kompleksno. V tem kontekstu globalno širjenje politik, prednostnih nalog in diskurza o vseživljenjskem učenju vpliva na nacionalne agende prek različnih političnih okvirov in instrumentov. V članku na podlagi elementov teorije globalnega upravljanja preučujemo OZN-ov skupni okvir za delovanje iz leta 2017, naslovljen Leaving No One Behind (Nikogar ne pusti ob strani), in zagovarjamo tezo, da je ta dokument služil kot mejnik pri implementaciji Agende 2030 na nacionalni ravni, saj se od objave naprej kaže njegovo splošno upoštevanje v komunikaciji in pisnem diskurzu vseh sektorjev na področju izobraževanja. Ukvarjamo se z vidiki prilagajanja politiki »Nikogar ne pusti zadaj« na Portugalskem, in sicer prek kritične analize diskurza dveh dokumentov portugalske nacionalne politike. Ugotovitve potrjujejo vpliv tega globalnega političnega žargona na nedavne uradne dokumente na Portugalskem.

Metrike

Nalaganej metrik....

Prenosi

Podatki o prenosih še niso na voljo.

Literatura

Agamben, G. (2005). State of Exception. University of Chicago Press.

Alexander, J. (1994). Modem, anti, post, and neo: How social theories have tried to understand the “new world” of “our time”. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 23(3), 165–197.

Althusser, L. (2014). On the reproduction of capitalism: Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. Verso Books.

Bajner, M. (2019). Lifelong learning redefined: From sustainability to generational learning. Andragoška spoznanja/Studies in Adult Education and Learning, 25(3), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.4312/as.25.3.35-45

Barros, R. (2012). From lifelong education to lifelong learning: Discussion of some effects of today’s neoliberal policies. European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults, 3(2), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.3384/rela.2000-7426.rela0071

Barros, R. (2023). The right to education of adults in Portugal. The International Journal of Human Rights, 27(5), 950–973. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2023.2194107

Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Polity Press.

Baycan, T., & Öner, Ö. (2023). The dark side of social capital: A contextual perspective. The Annals of Regional Science, 70, 779–798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-022-01112-2

Benassi, D., & Mingione, E. (2019). Welfare capitalism. In A. Orum (Ed.), The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Studies (pp. 1–7). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Carrier, J. (2018). (Ed.). Economy, crime and wrong in a neoliberal era. Berghahn.

Christensen, J., Holst, C., & Molander, A. (2023). Expertise, policy-making and democracy. Routledge.

Competence Centre for Planning, Policy and Foresight in Public Administration. (n.d.). PlanAPP: Plan, design, evaluate. https://www.planapp.gov.pt/en/

Council of Ministers. (2020, November 13). Resolução do Conselho de Ministros n.º 98/2020, de 13 de novembro. https://diariodarepublica.pt/dr/detalhe/resolucao-conselho-ministros/98-2020-148444002

Council of Ministers. (2023, January 23). Resolução do Conselho de Ministros n.º 5/2023, de 23 de janeiro. https://diariodarepublica.pt/dr/detalhe/resolucao-conselho-ministros/5-2023-206399845

Crossley, N. (2004). Key concepts in critical social theory. SAGE Publications.

Daly, M., & Silver, H. (2008). Social exclusion and social capital: A comparison and critique. Theory and Society, 37, 537–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-008-9062-4

Escobar, A. (2004). Beyond the third world: Imperial globality, global coloniality and anti-globalisation social movements. Third World Quarterly, 25(1), 207–230.

European Commission. (2019, January 30). A sustainable Europe by 2030. https://commission.europa.eu/publications/sustainable-europe-2030_en

Fairclough, I., & Fairclough, N. (2015). Textual analysis. In M. Bevir & R. A. W. Rhodes (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Interpretive Political Science (pp. 186–198). Routledge.

Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.

Giroux, H. (2008). Against the terror of neoliberalism politics beyond the age of greed. Routledge.

Gläser-Zikuda, M., Hagenauer, G., & Stephan, M. (2020). The potential of qualitative content analysis for empirical educational research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 21(1), 17.

Hessel, S., & Morin, E. (2011). The path to hope. Other Press.

High-level Political Forum on Sustainable Development. (n.d.). Inputs to the High-level Political Forum on Sustainable Development. https://hlpf.un.org/inputs

history.com editors. (2018, August 21). United Nations. https://www.history.com/topics/stories/united-nations#section_7

Ilcan, S. (2006). Global governing organisations: order building and waste management. Current Sociology, 54(6), 851–872. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392106068454

James, P., & Steger, M. B. (2014). A genealogy of ‘globalization’: The career of a concept. Globalizations, 11(4), 417–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2014.951186

Jones, P., & Coleman, D. (2005). The United Nations and education: Multilateralism, development and globalisation. Routledge.

Jørgensen, M., & Phillips, L. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. Sage Publications.

King, B. (2010). On the new dignity of labour. Ephemera, 10(3/4), 285–302.

Klinkner, M., & Howard, D. (2020). The right to the truth in international law victims’ rights in human rights and international criminal law. Routledge.

Leventoğlu, B. (2014). Social mobility, middle class, and political transitions. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 58(5), 825–864. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200271347856

Lima, L. (2018). Adult and permanent education in times of crisis: A critical perspective based on Freire and Gelpi. Studies in the Education of Adults, 50(2), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2018.1523087

Mahmood, Z., Beardsley, K., Newton, C., Roy, C., Kathman, J. D., Tucker, C., Nomikos, W. G., Villa, D. N., Binder, M., Allen, S., Yuen, A., Passmore, T. J. A., Shannon, M., Hultman, L., & Chapman, T. L. (2022). Editorial: The United Nations after 75: Assessing current understandings, charting fruitful research agendas. International Peacekeeping, 29(4), 551–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2022.2098650

Martens, K., Niemann, D., & Kaasch, A. (2021). International organizations in global social governance. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65439-9_14

Ministry of Labor, Solidarity and Social Security. (2023, September 14). Portaria n.º 282/2023, de 14 de setembro. https://diariodarepublica.pt/dr/detalhe/portaria/282-2023-221642378

Morgan, S. L. (2013). Handbook of causal analysis for social research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6094-3

National Board of Education. (2020). Recomendação N.º 2/2019: Para uma política de educação e formação de adultos. CNE.

National Board of Education. (2022). O estado da educação – 2021. CNE.

National Institute for Statistics. (2022). Objectivos de desenvolvimento sustentável – Agenda 2030: Indicadores para Portugal – 2015/2021. INE.

Peffley, M., & Rohrschneider, R. (2009). Elite beliefs and the theory of democratic elitism. In R. J. Dalton & H.‐D. Klingemann (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior (pp. 65–79). Oxford University Press.

Permanent Mission of Portugal to the United Nations. (2023, July 8). HLPF 2023 – Presentation of the Second Voluntary National Review of Portugal. https://onu.missaoportugal.mne.gov.pt/en/the-mission/news/presentation-of-the-2nd-voluntary-national-review-of-portugal

Pogge, T. (2010). Politics as usual: What lies behind the pro-poor rhetoric. Polity Press.

Popović, K. (2018). Education between global goals and national practices. In V. Orlović Lovren, J. Peeters, & N. Matovic (Eds.), Quality of Education: Global Development Goals and Local Strategies (pp.13–28). Institute for Pedagogy and Andragogy Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade Department of Social Work; Social Pedagogy Centre for Innovation in the Early Years Ghent University.

Portugal. (2017). Voluntary National Review – UN Portugal. https://hlpf.un.org/countries/portugal

Portugal. (2023). Voluntary National Review – UN Portugal.

Qualifica. (2017). Programa Qualifica. https://www.portalqualificaq.gov.pt/#/

Satoshi, A., & Takehiko, K. (2022). Credential Inflation and decredentialization: Re-examining the mechanism of the devaluation of degrees. European Sociological Review, 38(6), 904–919. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcac004

Solesin, L. (2020). The global governance of Education 2030: Challenges in a changing landscape. Education Research and Foresight, Working Papers, 26, 1–14.

Stibbe, D., Prescott, D., The Partnering Initiative, & United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2020). The SDG partnership guidebook: A practical guide to building high impact multi-stakeholder partnerships for the Sustainable Development Goals (1st ed.). United Nations; The Partnering Initiative.

Stone, D. (1999). Learning lessons and transferring policy across time, space and disciplines. Politics, 19(1), 51–59.

UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education: Report of the International Commission on the Futures of Education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707

UNESCO. (2016). Unpacking sustainable development goal 4 education 2030 guide. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000246300

United Nations. (n.d.-a). The 17 goals. https://sdgs.un.org/goals

United Nations. (n.d.-b). Universal declaration of human rights. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights

United Nations. (n.d.-c). UN system. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-system

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. https://sdgs.un.org/sites/default/files/publications/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf

United Nations. (2017). Leaving no one behind: Equality and non-discrimination at the heart of sustainable development: A shared un system framework for action. United Nations, Chief Executives Board for Coordination. https://unsceb.org/sites/default/files/imported_files/CEB%20equality%20framework-A4-web-rev3.pdf

United Nations. (2018). The essential UN. UN, Department of Public Information.

United Nations. (2019a). Sustainable Development Goals progress chart 2019. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2019/progress-chart.pdf

United Nations. (2019b). UN sustainable development cooperation framework - internal guidance. https://unsdg.un.org/resources/united-nations-sustainable-development-cooperation-framework-guidance

United Nations. (2023a). High-level Group for Partnership, Coordination and Capacity-Building for statistics for the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/hlg

United Nations. (2023b). Sustainable development goal indicators. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs

United Nations. (2023c). The Sustainable Development Goals progress chart 2023. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2023/progress-chart/Progress-Chart-2023.pdf

United Nations. (2023d). Times of crisis, times of change - science for accelerating transformations to sustainable development: Global Sustainable Development Report. https://sdgs.un.org/gsdr/gsdr2023

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (n.d.-a). SDG country profile: Portugal. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/dataportal/countryprofiles/prt#goal-1

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (n.d.-b). Working group on interlinkages of SDG statistics to allow for integrated analyses in the monitoring. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/files/Working-Group-ToR--Interlinkages.pdf

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2023). Pathways to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. https://www.un-ilibrary.org/content/books/9789213585115c006

United Nations Economic and Social Council. (2023). Summary by the President of the Economic and Social Council of the high-level political forum on sustainable development convened under the auspices of the Council at its 2023 session. https://hlpf.un.org/sites/default/files/2023-09/E%20HLPF%202023%207.pdf

United Nations Sustainable Development Group. (n.d.). Who we are. https://unsdg.un.org/about/who-we-are

United Nations Sustainable Development Group. (2022). Operationalizing Leaving No One Behind - Good practice note for UN country teams. https://unsdg.un.org/resources/leaving-no-one-behind-unsdg-operational-guide-un-country-teams

Valente, A. (2020). Ninguém pode ficar para trás: O contributo do Programa Qualifica. In A. M. Canelas (Ed.), Educação de Adultos: Ninguém pode ficar para trás: Seminários e Colóquios do Conselho Nacional de Educação (pp. 78–84). CNE.

Vladimirova, K., & Le Blanc, D. (2016). Exploring links between education and sustainable development goals through the lens of UN flagship reports. Sustainable Development, 24(4), 254–271. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1626

Walsh, J. (2014). The critical role of discourse in education for democracy. Journal For Critical Education Policy Studies, 6(2), 54–76.

Zeus, L. (2004). Critical social theory and transformative knowledge: The functions of criticism in quality education. Educational Researcher, 33(6), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033006011

Zürn, M. (2018). A theory of global governance: Authority, legitimacy, and contestation. Oxford University Press.