Hybrid International Comparative Group Work on Digitalization in Adult Education and Learning: An Auto-Ethnography on the Journey of the Moderators and Participants

Emmanuel  Jean-Francois; Therese  Rosemann; Rehana  Saleem Panjwani; Funmilayo  Adewole

doi:10.4312/as/19969

Avtorji

Emmanuel Jean-Francois Xavier University of Louisiana
Therese Rosemann Helmut Schmidt University
Rehana Saleem Panjwani PhD Fellow, University of Lisbon
Funmilayo Adewole PhD student, University of Lagos

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4312/as/19969

Ključne besede:

primerjalna pedagogika, medkulturne kompetence, internacionalizacija, učenje na daljavo

Povzetek

Cilj študije je bil analizirati izkušnje dveh moderatorjev in dveh udeležencev mednarodnega primerjalnega skupinskega dela o digitalizaciji v izobraževanju in učenju odraslih, ki je temeljilo na hibridnem načinu izvajanja, da bi zagotovili medkulturne perspektive, ki lahko prispevajo k boljšemu razumevanju oblikovalcev navodil in izobraževalcev odraslih ter drugih izvajalcev, vključenih v digitalizacijo izobraževanja odraslih. Konceptualni okvir te kvalitativne raziskovalne študije sta oblikovala hibridno učenje in teorija medkulturnega učenja. Uporabljena je bila metodologija kolaborativne avtoetnografije, kjer so raziskovalci na podlagi svojih avtobiografskih zgodb analizirali svoje izkušnje sodelovanja v mednarodnem primerjalnem skupinskem delu. Rezultati kažejo, da so oblikovne značilnosti, povezane z načrtovanjem in izvedbo hibridnega mednarodnega primerjalnega skupinskega dela o digitalizaciji v izobraževanju in učenju odraslih, moderatorjem in udeležencem omogočile izkušnjo medkulturnega učenja.

Metrike

Nalaganej metrik....

Prenosi

Podatki o prenosih še niso na voljo.

Literatura

Adel, A., & Dayan, J. (2021). Towards an intelligent blended system of learning activities model for New Zealand institutions: An investigative approach. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1) 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00696-4

Alvesson, M. (2003). Beyond neopositivists, romantics, and localists: A reflexive approach to interviews in organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 13–33. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.8925191

Amorim, L. (2001). Intercultural learning: A few awareness tips for US and European fellows & host community foundations. Community Foundation Transatlantic Fellowship.

Armstrong, L. R. (2008). The effectiveness of instruments used to measure the multicultural

competence of school counselors. InSight: RiverAcademic Journal, 4(2), 1–4.

Anderson, L. (2006). Analytic autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35(4), 373–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241605280449

Aparicio, M., Bacao, F., & Oliveira, T. (2016). Cultural impacts on e-learning systems’ success. Internet and Higher Education, 31, 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.06.003

Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of blended learning: Global Perspectives, local designs. Pfeiffer Publishing.

Castro, R. (2019). Blended learning in higher education: Trends and capabilities. Education and Information Technology, 24(4), 2523–2546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09886-3

Chang, H. (2016). Autoethnography in health research: Growing pains? Qualitative Health Research, 26(4), 443–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315627432

Chang, H., Faith, W. N., & Kathy-Ann, C. H. (2012). Collaborative autoethnography (Vol. 8). Left Coast.

Denzin, N. (2014). Interpretive autoethnography. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506374697

Du, Y., & Simpson, C. (2002, January 15–18,). Effects of learning styles and class participationon students’ enjoyment level in distributed learning environments [Conference presentation]. Association for Library and Information Science Education.

Eriksson, T. (2010). Being native: Distance, closeness and doing auto/self-ethnography. Art Monitor, 8, 91–100.

Falloon, G. (2011). Exploring the virtual classroom: what students need to know (and teachers should consider). Journal of online learning and teaching, 7(4), 439–451.

Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001

Gergen, K. J., & Gergen, M. M. (2018). Doing things with words: Toward evocative ethnography. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 15(2–3), 272–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2018.1430004

Harrison, R., Hutt, I., Thomas-Varcoe, C., Motteram, G., Else, K., Rawlings, B., & Gemmell, I. A. (2017). Cross-sectional study to describe academics “confidence, attitudes, and experience of online distance learning in higher education.” The Journal of Educators Online, 14(2), 1–9.

Heitmayer, M., & Schimmelpfennig, R. (2023). Netiquette as digital social norms. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 40(13), 3334–3354. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2188534

Hiltz, S. R., & Goldman, R. (Eds.). (2004). Learning together online: Research on asynchronous learning networks (1st ed.). Routledge.

Jean-Francois, E. (2012). Transculturality. In E. Jean-Francois (Ed.), Transcultural blended learning and teaching in postsecondary education (pp. 1–14). IGI-Global.

Jean-Francois, E. (2015). Building global education with a local perspective: Introduction to glocal higher education. Palgrave-Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137386779

Jean-Francois, E. (2018). Introduction: Transnational perspectives on innovation in teaching and learning technologies. In E. Jean-Francois (Ed.), Transnational perspectives on innovation in teaching and learning technologies (pp. 1–11). Brill/Sense.

Jean-Francois, E., & Rosemann, T. (2023). Netiquette guidelines. Adult Education Academy.

Jorgensen, M., Mason, A., Pedersen, R., & Harrison, R. (2022). The transformative learning potential in the hybrid space between technology and intercultural encounters. Journal of Studies in International Education, 26(3), 318–333. htps://doi.org/10.1177/1028315320976030

Kaputa, V., Loučanová, E., & Tejerina-Gaite, F. A. (2022). Digital transformation in higher education institutions as a driver of social oriented innovations. In C. Păunescu, K. Lepik, & N. Spencer (Eds.), Social Innovation in Higher Education (pp. 81–85). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84044-0_4

Karlsson, B., Klevan, T., Soggiou, A. S., Sælør, K., Villje, L., & Aasgaard, H. (2019). «Fra kebab til intimi- tet» – dialogisk autoetnografisk utforsking av vennskap [From Kebab to intimacy: A dialogical autoethnographic exploration of friendship]. Scandinavian Psychologist, 6(6), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.15714/scandpsychol.6.e6

Klimova, B. F., & Kacetl, J. (2015). Hybrid learning and its current role in the teaching of foreign languages. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 182, 477–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.830

Lapadat, J. C. (2017). Ethics in autoethnography and collaborative autoethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(8), 589–603. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417704462

Lawrence, G. (2013). A working model for intercultural learning and engagement in collaborative online language learning environments. Intercultural Education, 24(4), 303–314.

Mayrberger, K. (2020). Partizipative Mediendidaktik: Darstellung von Eckpunkten und Vertiefung des Partizipationsraums als konstituierendes Strukturelement. MedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung, 17, 59–92. https://doi.org/10.21240/mpaed/jb17/2020.04.26.X

Mitchell, A., & Honore, S. (2007). Criteria for successful blended learning. Industrial and Commercial Training, 39(3), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1108/00197850710742243

Nash-Ditzel, S., & Brown, T. (2012). Freedoms in the classroom: Cultivating a successful third space for literacy growth. Language and Literacy, 14(3), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.20360/G24G6T

Ohana, Y., & Otten, H. (2012). A new intercultural learning concept for the European youth sector? In Y. Ohana & H. Otten (Eds.), Where do you stand? (pp. 183–239). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-94326-8_19

Rothwell, A., & Rothwell, F. (2014). Sustaining academic professional careers. In L. Gornall, C. Cook, L. Daunton, J. Salisbury, & B. Thomas (Eds.), Academic working lives: Experience, practice and change (pp. 129–137). Bloomsbury.

Schmid, J. (2019). Autoethnography: Locating the self as standpoint in post-apartheid South Africa. In S. Laher, A. Fynn, & S. Kramer (Eds.), Transforming research methods in the social sciences: Case studies from South Africa (pp. 265–279). Wits University Press.

Smith, K., & Hill, J. (2019). Defining the nature of blended learning through its depiction in current research. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(2), 383–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1517732

Smith, P. J., Feigh, K., Sarter, N., & Woods, D. (2021). Online instruction for cognitive systems engineering: Lessons learned and opportunities to pursue. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 63(1), 551–555.

Soler-Costa, R., Lafarga-Ostáriz, P., Mauri-Medrano, M., & Moreno-Guerrero, A.-J. (2021). Netiquette: Ethic, education, and behavior on internet—a systematic literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(3), 1212. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031212

Taylor, D. C. M., & Hamdy, H. (2013). Adult learning theories: Implications for learning and teaching in medical education. Medical Teacher, 35(11), 1561–1572.

UNESCO. (2021). COVID-19 educational disruption and response. https://www.iiep.unesco.org/en/covid-19-educational-disruption-and-response-13363

Yang, H., Cai, J., Yang, H. H., & Wang, X. (2023). Examining key factors of beginner’s continuance intention in blended learning in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 35(1), 126–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-022-09322-5