The Role of Automated Decision-Making in Modern Administrative Law: Challenges and Data Protection Implications

Grega  Rudolf; Polonca Kovač

doi:10.17573/cepar.2024.2.04

Authors

Grega Rudolf Information Commissioner, Republic of Slovenia; University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Law, Slovenia (PhD student) https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9449-6905
Polonca Kovač University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Public Administration, Slovenia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7743-0514

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2024.2.04

Keywords:

administrative law, administrative procedures, artificial intelligence, automated decision-making, good administration, legal principles, personal data protection

Abstract

Purpose: The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in automated decision-making (ADM) represents a transformative moment in public administration. This paper explores the incorporation of ADM systems into administrative procedures, focusing on their impact on personal data protection and the fundamental principles underpinning administrative law.
Design/Methodology/Approach: Utilising a combination of descriptive, normative, and doctrinal research methods, the study draws on recent regulatory initiatives, analyses selected ADM use cases in Slovenia and abroad, and closely examines the 2023 Schufa case decided by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). By combining theoretical perspectives with practical insights, the research provides a comparative analysis within the context of EU and Slovenian legal frameworks.
Findings: The study assesses how ADM systems interact with, and potentially reshape, key principles of administrative and data protection law. It presents a clear picture of the legislative, organisational, and technological changes required to ensure that ADM systems align with existing legal frameworks.
Academic Contribution to the Field: By offering valuable guidance for public administration professionals, the paper enhances the understanding of implementing ADM technologies in administrative practice. Its insights assist policymakers and legislators in crafting regulations that embrace the benefits of AI while ensuring these systems are subject to proper oversight.
Research/Practical/Social Implications: The deployment of ADM systems must align with legal principles to maintain transparency, accountability, and the protection of fundamental rights. This paper highlights the importance of not only understanding the legal implications but also ensuring that ADM technologies uphold standards of good governance.
Originality/Value: This research extends the boundaries of established legal frameworks and raises critical questions about how core principles of administrative and data protection law can adapt to new technologies. The challenge lies in leveraging AI to increase efficiency while ensuring these innovations respect individual rights, safeguard the public interest, and uphold standards of good administration and governance.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Algorithm Watch (2020). Automating Society Report 2020. At<https://automatingsociety.algorithmwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Automating-Society-Report-2020.pdf>, accessed 3 August 2024.

Babšek, M. and Kovač, P. (2023). The Covid-19 Pandemic as a Driver of More Responsive Social Procedures: between Theory and Practices in Slovenia. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 16(1) 1–32. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2023-0001.

Benjamin, J. (2023). Safeguarding the Right to an Effective Remedy in Algorithmic Multi-Governance Systems: An Inquiry in Artificial Intelligence-Powered Informational Cooperation in the EU Administrative Space. Review of European Administrative Law, (2), pp. 9–36.

Carlsson, V. (2023). Legal Certainty in Automated Decision-making in Welfare Services. Public Policy and Administration, 0(0), https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767231202334.

Cetina Presuel, R. and Martinez Sierra, J. M. (2022). The Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Bureaucratic Decision-making: A Weberian Perspective. Digital Government: Research and Practice.

De la Tour, R. (2024). Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour in Case C‑203/22, Court of Justice of the European Union. At<https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=271684&doclang=EN>, accessed 20 August 2024.

Della Cananea, G. and Parona, L. (2024). Administrative procedure acts in Europe: An emerging "common core"? The American Journal of Comparative Law, avae016, 20, pp. 1–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avae016

Dragos, D. C. (2023). Administrative Procedure. In A. Farazmand, ed., Global Encyclopaedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer Nature, pp. 363–369.

Enqvist, L. and Naarttijärvi, M. (2023). Discretion, Automation, and Proportionality. In M. Suksi, ed., The Rule of Law and Automated Decision-Making: Exploring Fundamentals of Algorithmic Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 147-178.

European Legal Institute (ELI). (2022). Model Rules on Impact Assessment of Algorithmic Decision-Making Systems used by Public Administration. Report of the European Law Institute.

European Legal Institute (ELI). (2024). Charter of Fundamental Constitutional Principles of a European Democracy. Report of the European Law Institute.

Finck, M. (2019). Automated Decision-Making and Administrative Law. In P. Cane et al., ed., Oxford Handbook of Comparative Administrative Law. Oxford, Oxford University Press, Max Planck Institute for Innovation in Competition Research Paper, pp. 19–10.

Galetta, U. D. and Hofmann, H. C. H. (2023). Evolving AI-based Automation – The Continuing Relevance of Good Administration. European Law Review, 48/6, pp. 617–635.

Galetta, D. U. et al. (2015). The General Principles of EU Administrative Procedural Law. Brussels: European Parliament. https://doi.org/10.2861/641578.

Goldsteen, A. et al. (2022). Data Minimization for GDPR Compliance in Machine Learning Models. AI and Ethics, 2, pp. 477–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00095-8.

Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2023). Explaining Why the Computer Says No: Algorithmic Transparency Affects the Perceived Trustworthiness of Automated Decision‐making. Public Administration Review, 83(2), pp. 241–262.

Hamon, R. et al. (2022). Bridging the Gap Between AI and Explainability in the GDPR: Towards Trustworthiness-by-Design in Automated Decision-Making. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, 17(1), pp. 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCI.2021.3129960.

Jančova, L. and Fernandes, M. (2022). Digitalisation and Administrative Law. European Parliament, Brussels.

Kovač, P. (2016). The Requirements and Limits of the Codification of Administrative Procedures in Slovenia According to European Trends. Review of central and east European law, 41, pp. 427–461. https://doi.org/10.1163/15730352-04103007.

Kovač, P. (2022). Traditional and European Oriented Principles in the Codification of Administrative Procedures in Central Eastern Europe. Croatian and comparative public administration, 22(1), pp. 9–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31297/hkju.22.1.6

Kovač, P. and Rudolf, G. (2022). Social Aspects of Democratic Safeguards in Privacy Rights: A Qualitative Study of The European Union and China. Central European Public Administration Review, 20(1), pp. 7–32. https://doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2022.1.01.

Kuziemski, M. and Misuraca, G. (2020). AI governance in the public sector: Three tales from the frontiers of automated decision-making in democratic settings. Telecommunications policy, 44(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101976.

Palmiotto, F. (2024). When Is a Decision Automated? A Taxonomy for a Fundamental Rights Analysis. German Law Journal, 25, pp. 210–236. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2023.112.

Parycek, P. Schmid, V. and Novak, A. S. (2023). Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Automation in Administrative Procedures: Potentials, Limitations, and Framework Conditions. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, pp. 1–26.

Ranchordas, S. (2024). The Invisible Citizen in the Digital State: Administrative Law Meets Digital Constitutionalism. In J. De Poorter, C. Oirsouw and G. van der Schyff, eds., European Yearbook of Constitutional Law (forthcoming).

Reis, J., Santo, P.E. and Melão, N.F. (2019). Impacts of Artificial Intelligence on Public Administration: A Systematic Literature Review. 14th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), pp. 1–7.

Rhahla, M., Allegue, S. and Abdellatif, T. (2021). Guidelines for GDPR Compliance in Big Data Systems. Journal of Information Security and Applications, 61(C).

Roehl, U. B. (2023). Automated Decision-making and Good Administration: Views from Inside the Government Machinery. Government Information Quarterly, 40(4).

Rudolf, G. and Kovač, P. (2023). Procedural Challenges of Cross-border Cooperation and Consistency in Personal Data Protection in the EU. NISPAcee Journal, 16(2), pp. 143–170.

Tangi L. et al. (2022). AI Watch. European Landscape on the Use of Artificial Intelligence by the Public Sector. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.