Shaping Administrative Activity (Legal Forms): A Legislative Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2024.2.07Keywords:
administrative procedural rules, Constitutional Court, good administration, legislature, legislative process, legal forms of public administrationAbstract
Purpose: The topic of legal forms in public administration is strongly influenced by the principles of good administration. In the Czech legal order, the Parliament acts as the rule-maker of statutory foundations for public administration, making it crucial to focus on the legislative approach to enacting legal forms. This paper examines the weaknesses in legislation related to the enactment of legal forms of public administration, specifically through the principles of legal certainty and predictability of law.
Design/Methodology/Approach: The author analyses Czech legal norms, existing legal doctrine, and administrative court’s rulings in relation to the legislative enactment of legal forms of public administration. This analysis leads to categorisation of legislative techniques based on the clarity with which the legal form of public administration activity is enacted. The paper also includes a case study consisting of a qualitative analysis of the legislative process in a specific case, based on publicly available records of parliamentary debates during the legislative process.
Findings: In the case under review, there was no proper discussion of the implications of removing the explicit designation of legal form during the legislative process. No case has been found in which the Constitutional Court, acting as a negative legislator, annulled a statute for failing to explicitly specify a legal form, either due to its removal or its absence from the outset.
Academic contribution to the field: The article highlights that, for the public administration to function effectively as good administration, the rules governing its activities must be clearly defined. The findings encourage legislators to ensure that proper discussions regarding the legal form of administrative activity take place when enacting laws. Such expert debate during the legislative process is essential to ensuring the clarity of the laws under which public administration operates in a particular legal form. Circumventing the legislative process or failing to engage in proper debate disproportionately impacts legal certainty and the predictability of law.
Originality/Value: This article presents arguments emphasising the irrefutable role of the legislature in creating clear rules for the exercise of public administration and, as a direct result, enabling public administration to function as good administration. It points out the importance of clearly referencing the legal form of public administration in the law. The categorisation of legal form designation aids in identifying patterns and trends, helping to isolate relevant issues and focusing research on specific legal questions.
Metrics
Downloads
References
Boháč, R. (2011). Důvodová zpráva. In R. Boháč et al., Legislativní proces: (teorie a praxe). Prague: Tiskárna Ministerstva vnitra.
Bražina, R. (2016.) Odůvodnění normativních (s)právních aktů a jejich vztah k ochraně práv adresátů veřejné správy. Právník, 155(11) pp. 999-1010.
Brož, J. (2016). Prostředky ochrany subjektivních práv dotčených normativními správními akty. Diploma thesis. Masaryk University, Faculty of Law.
Della Cananea, G. and Parona L. (2024). Administrative Procedure Acts in Europe: An Emerging “Common Core”? The American Journal of Comparative Law, 72(2).
Filip, J. (2007). Vliv Ústavního soudu a obecných soudů na tvorbu práva v ČR. In J. Filip et al, Tvorba práva v České republice po vstupu do Evropské unie. Prague: Sborník ASPI, pp. 205-217.
Hejč, D. and Bahýľová, L. (2017). Opatření obecné povahy v teorii a praxi. Prague: C.H. Beck.
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 18 August 2004 Pl. ÚS 7/03 (N 113/34 SbNU 165; 512/2004 Coll..)
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 31 January 2008 Pl. ÚS 24/07 (N 26/48 SbNU 303; 88/2008 Coll.)
Judgment of the Constitutional Court ruling of 13 December 2016 Pl. ÚS 19/16 (N 237/83 SbNU 677 8/2017 Coll.).
Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court of 20 December 2017, No. 6 As 288/2016-146, No. 3696/2018 Coll.
Kadečka, S., Bražina, R. and Hejč, D. (2017). Ochrana subjektivních práv proti normativním správním aktům. In S. Skulová et al. Prostředky ochrany subjektivních práv ve veřejné správě - jejich systém a efektivnost. Prague: C.H. Beck, pp. 290-301.
Karpen, U. (2017). Legislation and Legisprudence. In U. Karpen and H. Xanthaki, Legislation in Europe: a comprehensive guide for scholars and practitioners. Oxford: Hart publishing.
Kokeš, M. (2020.) Temná zákoutí legislativního procesu: příprava vládních návrhů zákonů v ČR. Prague: Leges.
Mrlina, M. and Jančářová, I. (2021). Programy zlepšování kvality ovzduší - právní forma v průběhu času. Časopis pro právní vědu a praxi, 29(4), pp. 779-799.
Ramos, H. M. and Heydt, V. (2017). Legislative Language and Style. In U. Karpen et al., Legislation in Europe: a comprehensive guide for scholars and practitioners. Oxford: Hart publishing.
Resolution No 19 of the 6th meeting of the Environment Committee held on 14 March 2018 (Print 13/6)
Šín, Z. (2009.) Tvorba práva: pravidla, metodika, technika. Prague: C.H. Beck.
Smejkalová, T. and Štěpáníková M. (2019). Jazykové zvláštnosti textů právních předpisů. In M. Škop et al. Tvorba práva - empirické studie. Brno: Masaryk University, pp. 93-127.
Stone Sweet, A. (2000). Governing with judges: constitutional politics in Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.
Svoboda, T. and Hejč, D. (2021). K povaze „krizových opatření“, odpovědnosti za škodu a ochraně subjektivních práv (1. část). Právní rozhledy, 29(9), pp. 315–324.
Vedral, J. (2012). Správní řád: komentář. 2. editon. Prague: Ivana Hexnerová - Bova Polygon.
Venice Commission – European Commission for Democracy through Law. 2011. Stocktaking on the Notions of »Good Governance« and »Good Administration«, Study No. 470/2008, CDL-AD(2001)009.
Wintr, J. (2021). Proměny parlamentní kultury. Prague: Auditorium.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sára Hrubešová

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.