Challenges in Exercising the Right to Appeal – The Case of Slovenian Administrative Consultation

Polonca Kovač

doi:10.17573/cepar.2024.2.11

Authors

Polonca Kovač University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Public Administration, Slovenia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7743-0514

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2024.2.11

Keywords:

administrative procedural law, Administrative Consultation, right to appeal, GAPA codification, Slovenia

Abstract

Purpose: The article aims to identify systemic challenges in Slovenian administrative practice arising from an inadequately regulated right to appeal under the General Administrative Procedure Act (GAPA). For this purpose, an analysis of Administrative Consultation (AC), a legal clinic operating since 2009, was conducted. The study includes analyses of the content, complexity, and reasoning behind the occurring dilemmas as a ground for GAPA recodification.
Design/Methodology/Approach: Considering the nature of the topic in the scope of administrative law, a combined qualitative approach is applied, including normative and dogmatic methods, literature analysis, case law review, basic statistics, and axiological method. Empirical research is based on over one hundred cases with questions and answers regarding GAPA interpretation in administrative practice.
Findings: Administrative appeal serves multiple functions, from protecting the rights of the parties to ensuring consistent sector-specific legislation implementation. The analysis identifies systemic issues, such as: standing to file an appeal (especially for other affected persons or authorities), grounds for appeal, competence regarding appellate decisions, determining when the first-instance body can handle an appeal and when devolution is necessary, alternative dispute resolution in appeals, deadlines for lodging and deciding on appeals, and the possibility of waiving the right to appeal. In addition, the (lack of) options for digitalised
proceedings is notable. These insights serve as an empirical basis GAPA recodification.
Academic Contribution to the Field: The article offers a regulatory and doctrinal analysis of the relevant legal provisions (including EU law, the Slovenian Constitution, and the GAPA) focusing on the aims, locus standi, time limits, grounds, and other elements of appeals. It also explores the key findings from Slovenian case law on administrative disputes regarding appeals, as reflected in decisions by the Supreme and Administrative Courts as well as in administrative practice.
Research/Practical/Social Implications: The article provides a concise overview of the relevant literature and an analysis of the rules that underpin the implementation, evaluation, and improvement of GAPA as regards the right to appeal. Based on these insights, it proposes de lege ferenda solutions for a clearer GAPA. The findings can serve as a foundation for data-based decision-making.
Originality/Value: The article brings forward the study of AC as a source for systemic overview of problems in the field. With more than a hundred cases from the past 15 years analysed, it offers an objective insight into recurring dilemmas in administrative practice. The approach to identifying key challenges is consistent through the use of established and combined social sciences research methods.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Administrative Consultation Wiki (2024). At < https://upravna-svetovalnica.fu.uni-lj.si/index.php>, accessed 21 September 2024.

Androjna, V. and Kerševan, E. (2006). Upravno procesno pravo [Administrative Procedural Law]. Ljubljana_ GV založba.

Auby, J. B. (ed.) (2014). Codification of Administrative Procedure. Brussels: Bruylant.

Avbelj, M. (ed.) (2019). Komentar Ustave Republike Slovenije [Commentary to the Constitution of the RS]. Nova Gorica: New University, European Faculty of Law.

Benjamin, J. (2023). Safeguarding the Right to an Effective Remedy in Algorithmic Multi-Governance Systems: An Inquiry in Artificial Intelligence-Powered Informational Cooperation in the EU Administrative Space. Review of European Administrative Law, (2), pp. 9–36.

Đanić Čeko, A. and Kovač, P. (2020). Comparative analysis of an administrative appeal in Croatian, Slovenian, and EU law. In D. Duić and T. Petrašević, eds., EU and comparative law issues and challenges: EU 2020 - lessons from the past and solutions for the future, International Scientific Conference, Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Law Osijek, pp. 1065–1096. https://doi.org/10.25234/eclic/11940.

Đanić Čeko, A. and Petrašević, T. (2020). Lack of one common administrative procedure? Is regulation on the EU administrative procedure necessary in the EU? Balkan social science review, 15(2020), pp. 93–117. https://doi.org/10.46763/BSSR20150094djc.

Della Cananea, G. (2022). Administrative Procedure in Europe: National and Supranational Legislation. Program on Regulation Research Paper Series, No. 22-02. Penn.

Dragos, D. C. (2023). Administrative Procedure. In A. Farazmand , ed., Global Encyclopaedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer Nature, pp. 363–369.

Dragos, D. C. and Neamtu, B. (Eds.) (2014). Alternative Dispute Resolution in European Administrative Law. Springer.

Dragos, D. C., Kovač, P. and Tolsma, H. D. (Eds.) (2020). The Sound of Silence in European Administrative Law. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

Galetta, U.D. and Hofmann, H. C. H. (2023). Evolving AI-based automation – the continuing relevance of good administration. European Law Review, 48(6), pp. 617–635.

Galetta, U.D., Hofmann, H. C. H., Puigpelat O. M. and Ziller, J. (2015). The General Principles of EU Administrative Procedural Law. Brussels: European Parliament.

General Administrative Procedure Act, Official Gazette of the RS, No. 80/99 and amendments.

Godec, R. (ed.) (1993). Upravni zbornik [Administrative Compendium]. Ljubljana: Institute for Public Administration.

Hofmann, H.C.H., Schneider, J.-P. and Ziller, J. (Eds.) (2014). The ReNEUAL Model Rules. www.reneual.eu/.

Koprić, I. (Ed.) (2016). Legal Remedies in Administrative Procedures in Western Balkans. Danilovgrad: ReSPA.

Kovač, P. (2013). Effective Adjudication through Administrative Appeals in Slovenia. Utrecht Law Review, 9(3), pp. 39–50. https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.235.

Kovač, P. (2020). Codification of Administrative Procedure in Slovenija and the EU. Teorija in praksa, 57(3), pp. 848–866.

Kovač, P. (Ed.) (2023). Upravni postopki med teorijo in prakso [Administrative Procedures between Theory and Practice]. Ljubljana: Faculty of Public Administration of University of Ljubljana.

Kovač, P. and Dečman, M. (2009). Implementation and change of processual administrative legislation through an innovative Web 2.0 solution. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 28, pp. 65–86.

Kovač, P. and Sever, T. (2015). Collaborative public administration and administrative procedures: the Administrative Consultation Wiki. Teorija in praksa, 52(5), pp. 971–992.

Kovač, P. and Jerovšek, T. (2023). Upravni postopek in upravni spor [Administrative Procedure and Dispute]. Ljubljana: Faculty of Public Administration of University of Ljubljana.

Kovač, P. and Kerševan, E. (Eds.) (2020, 2022). Komentar Zakona o splošnem upravnem postopku, 1., 2., 3. knjiga [Commentary to the GAPA, Books 1, 2 and 3]. Ljubljana: Official Gazette of the RS.

Kovač, P. and Ribič, U. (2022). Effectiveness of administrative appeal in Slovenia and Croatia. The NISPAcee journal of public administration and policy, 15(1), pp. 39–60. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2022-0003.

Moldovan, O. and Bucătariu, G. (2019). Effectiveness and Efficiency of Administrative Appeal Procedures: a Case Study on Tax Disputes in Romania. Central European Public Administration Review, 17(2), pp. 9–34. https://doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2019.2.01.

Ranchordas, S. (2024). The Invisible Citizen in the Digital State: Administrative Law Meets Digital Constitutionalism. In J. De Poorter, C. Oirsouw and G. van der Schyff, eds., European Yearbook of Constitutional Law (forthcoming). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4674932.

Sever, T., Đanić, A., and Kovač, P. (2016). Effective legal protection against the excessive length of administrative decision-making: the cases of Slovenia and Croatia. The NISPAcee journal of public administration and policy, 9(1), pp. 135–166. https://doi.org/10.1515/nispa-2016-0007.

Stare, J. and Pečarič, M. (eds.) (2021). The Science of Public Administration. Ljubljana: Faculty of Administration of University of Ljubljana.

The Court of Justice of the European Union (2024). At <https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/jcms/j_6/en/>, accessed 2 September 2024.

The Supreme Court of the RS (2024). At , accessed 21 September 2024.