Law and Individualism: Balancing Rights, Responsibilities, and Group Dynamics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2025.1.02Keywords:
individualism, collective responsibility, group dynamics, informal groupsAbstract
Purpose: This article critically examines the interplay between individualism and collectivism in legal systems. It argues that the law remains disproportionately focused on individual rights and duties, even though group dynamics demonstrably shape behaviour. The paper therefore calls for the formal recognition of informal groups and the integration of collective responsibility to reflect current social realities more accurately.
Methodology: Employing a historical-legal and interdisciplinary lens, the study traces the evolution of individualism from Roman law to modern legal frameworks. It combines comparative legal analysis, theoretical critique, and normative analysis to propose legal reforms that reconcile individual autonomy with collective accountability.
Findings: Historically, legal systems have privileged individualism and underestimated the influence of groups. As a result, informal collectives often lack protection and meaningful participation in legal processes. This over-emphasis on the individual hampers effective responses to systemic discrimination, environmental harm, and labour rights violations. Although certain branches—such as corporate and environmental law—implicitly recognise collective responsibility, explicit mechanisms to balance
individual and group interests are still required. Flexible legal models can integrate group accountability without eroding personal rights.
Practical implications: Conferring limited legal personality on informal groups would enable them to assert rights without full formalisation. A calibrated balance between individual and collective liability would enhance the law’s capacity to address problems that demand shared responsibility. Strengthening collective legal tools—such as class actions, trade unions, and community governance—would improve legal representation, while the use of AI-enabled digital platforms could foster participatory
law-making and deliver fairer legal structures.
Metrics
Downloads
References
Arendt, H. (1972). Crises of the Republic: Lying in Politics, Civil Disobedience on Violence, Thoughts on Politics, and Revolution. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Arendt, H. (1973). The Origins of Totalitarianism. San Diego; New York; London: A Harvest Book.
Aristotle. (1998). Politics (C. D. C. Reeve, Trans.). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
Asch, S. E. (1952). Social psychology. New York: Prentice-Hall.
Barber, M. (2004). The Two Cities (2nd edition). London: Routledge.
Bicycle Dutch. (2010, September 26). Utrecht Pedestrian Zone (Netherlands). At< https://bicycledutch.wordpress.com/2010/09/27/utrecht-pedestrian-zone-netherlands/>, accessed 14 January 2025.
Carpini, M. X. D. (Ed.). (2019). Digital Media and Democratic Futures. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Desmet, M. (2022). The Psychology of Totalitarianism. London: Chelsea Green Publishing.
Dignum, V. (2019). Responsible Artificial Intelligence: How to Develop and Use AI in a Responsible Way. Cham: Springer Nature.
Durkheim, E. (1982). The Rules of Sociological Method (W. D. Halls, Trans.). New York: The Free Press.
Durkheim, E. (1984). The Division of Labor in Society (W. D. Halls, Trans.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ferdinand Tönnies. (2001). Community and Civil Society (J. Harris, Ed.; J. Harris & M. Hollis, Trans.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Festinger, L. (1954). A Theory of Social Comparison Processes—Leon Festinger, 1954. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140.
Forsyth, D. R. (2019). Group Dynamics. Massachusetts: Cengage Learning.
Francis, T. (2025). McDonald’s Sued Over Latino Scholarships, One Week After Retreating on Diversity. At<https://www.wsj.com/business/mcdonalds-sued-over-latino-scholarships-one-week-after-retreating-on-diversity-dc7a2438>, accessed 14 January 2025.
Glenn, P. (2004). Legal Traditions of the World: Sustainable Diversity in Law (2nd edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harari, Y. N. (2014). Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind. New York: Random House.
Harkins, S. G., Williams, K. D. and Burger, J. M. (2017). The Oxford Handbook of Social Influence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hobbes, T. (1998). Leviathan (J. C. A. Gaskin, Trans.). Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
Hooks, B. (2014). Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center (3rd edition). New York: Routledge.
Kant, I. (2003). Kritika praktičnega uma (R. Riha, Trans.). Ljubljana: Analecta.
Köhler, O. (1926). Kraftleistungen bei Einzel- und Gruppenarbeit. Industrielle Psychotechnik, 3, pp. 274–282.
Korošec, V. (1980). Rimsko pravo. Ljubljana: Pravna fakulteta Univerze Edvard Kardelj v Ljubljani.
Kravitz, D. A. and Martin, B. (1986). Ringelmann rediscovered: The original article. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(5), pp. 936–941. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.936
Krüger, B. (2023). Classis: Latin nouns. Cactus2000. At< https://latin.cactus2000.de/noun/shownoun_en.php?n=classis>, accessed 6 January 2025.
Lakner, C. and Milanovic, B. (2013). Global Income Distribution: From the Fall of the Berlin Wall to the Great Recession. Policy Research Working Paper; No. 6719. At< https://hdl.handle.net/10986/16935>, accessed 6 January 2025.
Locke, J. (2010). Dve razpravi o oblasti Pismo o toleranci. Ljubljana: Krtina.
MacIntyre, A. C. (2007). After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory (Third Edition). Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.
Marx, K. (2018). Capital (Das Capital): Includes Vol.1,2,3. New Delhi: Fingerprint! Publishing.
Merriam-Webster. (2025). Definition of CLASSIC. At<https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/classic>, acessed 6 january 2025.
Milgram, S. (2009). Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View (Reprint edition). New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics.
Niemoller, M. (2025, 1946). Holocaust Memorial Day Trust | First They Came – by Pastor Martin Niemöller. At<: https://hmd.org.uk/resource/first-they-came-by-pastor-martin-niemoller/>, accessed 3 May 2025.
Noveck, B. S. (2010). Wiki Government: How Technology Can Make Government Better, Democracy Stronger, and Citizens More Powerful (Reprint edition). Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Noveck, B. S. (2015). Smart Citizens, Smarter State: The Technologies of Expertise and the Future of Governing. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Noveck, B. S. (2016). Could crowdsourcing expertise be the future of government? The Guardian. At<https://www.theguardian.com/science/political-science/2016/nov/30/could-crowdsourcing-expertise-be-the-future-of-government>, accessed 10 January 2025.
Polanyi, K. (2008). Velika preobrazba: Politični in ekonomski viri našega časa. Ljubljana: /* cf.
Pope Francis. (2013). Homily of Holy Father Francis: Visit to Lampedusa—Holy Mass in the ‘Arena’ sports camp. At<https://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/homilies/2013/documents/papa-francesco_20130708_omelia-lampedusa.html>, accessed 10 January 2025.
Rousseau, J.-J. (2001). Družbena pogodba. Ljubljana: Krtina.
Saunders, J. (2025). Secrets of the ‘Shein village’ where kids were caught working in sweat shops. At<https://www.the-sun.com/lifestyle/13284122/shein-village-china-factories-rights/>, accessed 6 January 2025.
Schein, E. H. (2016). Organizational Culture and Leadership. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Sherif, M. (1988). The Robbers Cave Experiment: Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation. [Orig. pub. as Intergroup Conflict and Group Relations]. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.
Smart City Sweden. (2025). Vision Zero—Reducing Road Traffic Casualties and Injuries | News. At<https://smartcitysweden.com/best-practice/408/vision-zero-reducing-road-traffic-casualties-and-injuries/>, accessed 14 January 2025.
Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group Process and Productivity. New York: Academic Press.
Sunstein, C. R. (2011). Going to Extremes: How Like Minds Unite and Divide (Reprint edition). Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
Sunstein, C. R. (2021). Conformity: The Power of Social Influences. New York: NYU Press.
Tajfel, H. (Ed.). (2010). Social Identity and Intergroup Relations (Reissue edition). Paris: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, T. (2013). The Anatomy of the Nuremberg Trials: A Personal Memoir (1st edition). New York: Skyhorse.
Thompson, E. P. (2002). The Making of the English Working Class. London: Penguin UK.
Wiessner, D. (2025, January 14). Mastercard agrees to $26 mln settlement in pay bias lawsuit. Reuters. At<https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/mastercard-agrees-26-mln-settlement-pay-bias-lawsuit-2025-01-14/>, accessed 14 January 2025.
Zilber, A. (2025). Starbucks requiring baristas to work in LA stores near wildfires: Union. At<https://nypost.com/2025/01/13/business/starbucks-requiring-baristas-to-work-in-la-stores-near-wildfires-union/>, accessed 14 January 2025.
Zimbardo, P. G. (2008). The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil. New York: Random House Trade Paperbacks.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mirko Pečarič
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
