The Ombudsman as a Guardian of Good Governance: Insights from North Macedonia

Natalija Shikova

doi:10.17573/cepar.2025.2.10

Authors

Natalija Shikova International Balkan University, Faculty of Law, North Macedonia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3885-7870

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2025.2.10

Keywords:

challenges, good governance, human rights, North Macedonia, ombudsman

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to present the role of the Ombudsman in upholding the principles of good governance when protecting and promoting the rights of citizens and other individuals within a democratic framework. The research focuses on the work of the Ombudsman in North Macedonia, examining its activities and its authority over public institutions when acting or failing to act.
Design/Methodology/Approach: The research methods applied include desk research, an analysis of documents and reports related to the institutional and legal set-up of the Ombudsman’s office in North Macedonia, and content analysis. To understand the complexities of the Ombudsman’s competencies within the Macedonian institutional set-up, a comparative analysis was conducted, covering examples from the EU and other global contexts. To clarify the findings, semi-structured interviews were conducted with relevant officials, including the Ombudsman of North Macedonia and its deputies.
Findings: The results of this research indicate that, although the Ombudsman is empowered to protect the human rights and freedoms of individuals or groups when they are violated by state authorities, its efforts to contribute towards the efficient and effective operation of public administration, and to promote the principles of good governance and the right to good administration in North Macedonia, are limited. However, this corresponds with the overall efficiency of the institution and its position
within the legal and political system. In general, the institutional response to the Ombudsman’s remarks is weak, as evidenced by missed hearings before the Government, delays in the adoption of its annual reports by Parliament, a lack of public debate, and insufficient implementation of follow-up measures addressing the Ombudsman’s remarks. Furthermore, the Ombudsman institution does not enjoy full independence.
Practical Implications: The paper is based on research conducted in 2023/2024 and provides clear and structured recommendations for the improvement of the Ombudsman’s office in North Macedonia, aimed at achieving good governance standards. Due to its practical applicability, the recommendations can serve to improve the work of Ombudsman offices elsewhere in the region and beyond.
Originality/Value: This research highlights the role of the Ombudsman in fostering good governance and presents it as a necessary condition for establishing a robust system for the protection of individual rights. Often, the work of the Ombudsman is analysed through its ex officio interventions aimed at protecting rights when violated by state institutions. In this sense, the office intervenes with proposals, suggestions, and recommendations, acting as a guardian of individuals’ rights in relation to public administration. This research presents another perspective on the Ombudsman’s role—often neglected in public discourse—by offering a broader view of its function in upholding democratic standards and good governance principles.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Agere, S. (2000). Promoting good governance: Principles, practices and perspectives. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.

2. Annual reports of the Ombudsman. (2019). At < https://ombudsman.mk/CMS/Upload/NarodenPravobranitel/upload/NPM-dokumenti/2019/NPM%20Godisen%20izvestaj-2019-MK.pdf >, accessed 4 May 2025.

3. Annual reports of the Ombudsman. (2020). At < https://ombudsman.mk/CMS/Upload/NarodenPravobranitel/upload/NPM-dokumenti/2020/NPM%20Godisen%20izvestaj-2020-Mk.pdf >, accessed 4 May 2025.

4. Annual reports of the Ombudsman. (2021). At < https://ombudsman.mk/CMS/Upload/NarodenPravobranitel/upload/NPM-dokumenti/2021/NPM%20Godisen%20izvestaj-2021.pdf >, accessed 4 May 2025.

5. Annual reports of the Ombudsman. (2022). At < https://ombudsman.mk/CMS/Upload/NarodenPravobranitel/upload/NPM-dokumenti/2022/NPM%20Godisen%20izvestaj-2022-Mk-Alb-Ang.pdf >, accessed 4 May 2025.

6. Annual reports of the Ombudsman. (2023). At <https://ombudsman.mk/CMS/Upload/NarodenPravobranitel/upload/NPM-dokumenti/2023/NPM%20Godisen%20izvestaj-2023-Mk-Alb-Ang.pdf>, accessed 4 May 2025.

7. Bovens, M. (2005). Public accountability. In Ferlie et al., eds., The Oxford handbook of public management. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 182-209.

8. Balica, D (2011). The institution of the Romanian Ombudsman in a comparative perspective. In D. Dragos, B. Neamtu and R. Hamlin, eds., Law in action: case studies in good governance. East Lansing, pp. 334-358.

9. Bizjak, I. (2001). Special Features of the Role of the Ombudsman in Transition Conditions. International Ombudsman Yearbook, 5, pp. 83-97.

10. Capozzola, J.M. (1968). An American Ombudsman: Problems and Prospects. West Political Quarterly, 21(2), pp. 289–301.

11. Center for Change Management (CCM). (2024). Ombudsman - protector of the right for good administration. At < https://cup.org.mk/publication/the-public-ombudsman-in-protection-of-the-right-to-good-administration >, accessed 1 March 2025.

12. Cerrillo-i-Martínez, А. (2023). Principles of good governance. In A. Farazmand, ed., Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy and governance. Springer, pp. 10085-10090.

13. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (2000/C 364/01). At <https://www.europarl.europa.eu/charter/pdf/text_en.pdf>, accessed 1 March 2025.

14. Cheng, H.Y. (1968). The Emergence and Spread of the Ombudsman Institution. Annual American Academy of Political and Social Science, 377, pp. 20–30.

15. Constitution of the Republic of North Macedonia. (1991).

16. Doornbos, M. (2001). Good Governance: The Rise and Decline of a Policy Metaphor? Journal of Development Studies, 37(6), pp. 93–108. doi:10.1080/713601084.

17. Draft Law for amend and supplement the Law on the Ombudsman, 2025. At < https://www.sobranie.mk/preview?id=f8baf0de-0f9b-4da2-956f-a41624a6dfbe&url=https://sp.sobranie.mk/sites/2023/materials/638703398815096777/Documents/638748681683546381.docx&method=GetDocumentContent>, accessed 2 May 2025.

18. Dragos, D. and Neamtu, B. (2017). Freedom of Information in the EU in the Midst of Legal Rules, Jurisprudence and Ombudsprudence: The European Ombudsman as Developer of Norms of Good Administration Rights. European Constitutional Law Review, 13, pp. 641–672.

19. ENNHRI. (2024). Ombudsman of the Republic of North Macedonia. European Network of National Human Rights Institutions. At< https://ennhri.org/our-members/north-macedonia/>, accessed 24 July 2024.

20. Erkkila, T. (2020). Ombudsman as a Global Institution. Springer.

21. European Commission. (2023). Enhancing the European Administrative Space (ComPAct). At < https://commission.europa.eu/about-european-commission/departments-andexecutive-agencies/structural-reform-support/enhancing-european-administrative-spacecompact_en>, accessed 1 March 2025.

European Commission. (2024). Report on North Macedonia 2024. At < North Macedonia report_MK2.pdf >, accessed 1 March 2025.

22. European Commission. (2023). Report on North Macedonia 2023. At < https://www.sep.gov.mk/page/?id=1117 >, accessed 1 March 2025.

23. European Ombudsman. (2002). European Code of Good Administrative Behavior. At< https://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/publication/mk/3510 >, accessed 24 July 2024.

24. Freedom House. (2024). Freedom of the world: North Macedonia. At < https://freedomhouse.org/country/north-macedonia/freedom-world/2023>, accessed: 1 March 2025.

25. Gisselquist, R. M. (2012). Good Governance as a Concept, and Why These Matters for Development Policy. UNU-WIDER Working Paper No. 2012/30. Helsinki: World Institute for Development Economics Research, United Nations University.

26. Hill, L.B. (1974). Institutionalization, the Ombudsman, and Bureaucracy. American Political Science Review, 68(3), pp. 1075–1085.

27. Interview with Deputy Ombudsman Jovan Andonovski (Conducted by the CCM research team on 3 January 2024 with Natalija Shikova as the main researcher).

28. Interview with Ombudsman Naser Ziberi (Conducted by the CCM research team on 3 January 2024 with Natalija Shikova as the main researcher).

29. Interview with State Counselor in the Office of the Ombudsman, Vaska Bajramovska (Conducted by the CCM research team on 3 January 2024 with Natalija Shikova as the main researcher).

30. Kucsko-Stadlmayer, G. (2008). The legal structures of ombudsman-institutions in Europe – legal comparative analysis. In G. Kucsko-Stadlmayer, ed., European ombudsman-institutions: a comparative legal analysis regarding the multifaceted realization of an idea. Springer, pp. 1–67.

31. Law on the Ombudsman. (2003). Official Gazette, 60.

32. Letowska, E. (1990). The Polish Ombudsman (the Commissioner for the Protection of Civil Rights). International Comparative Law Quarterly, 39(1), pp. 206–217.

33. Leyland, P. and Anthony, G. (2016). Textbook on Administrative Law. 8th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

34. Ombudsman Official Page (n.d.). At< https://ombudsman.mk>, accessed 1 March 2025.

35. Peters, B. G. (2008). The Two Futures of Governing: Decentering and Recentering Processes in Governing. Reihe Politikwissenschaft: Political Science Series, Vol. 114. Wien: Institut für Höhere Studien.

36. Pliscoff, C. (2019). Ethics and public administration in Latin America. In A. Farazmand, ed., Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy and governance. Springer, pp. 4282-4294.

37. Press conference of the Ombudsman. (2023). The situation with human rights and freedoms in certain areas in 2023, 27 December.

38. Reif, L.C. (2004). The Ombudsman, Good Governance and the International Human Rights System. Springer.

39. Remac, M. (2014). Standards of Ombudsman Assessment: A New Normative Concept? Utrecht Law Review, 9(3), pp. 62-78.

40. Rowat, D.C. (1964). Ombudsmen for North America. Public Administration Review, 24(4), pp. 230–233.

41. Sakam da kazam (2016). Parliament will tie the Ombudsman’s hands with a new law. Сакам да кажам, 18 July. At < https://sdk.mk/index.php/glasno-zaombudsmanot/sobranieto-so-nov-zakon-ke-mu-gi-vrze-ratsete-na-narodniot-pravobranitel/ >, accessed 1 March 2025.

42. Shikova, N. (2022). Civic participation in shaping public policies? Evaluating “Regulatory Impact Assessment” as a democratic tool. In M., Schmidt-Gleim, R., Smilova and C. Wiesner, eds., Democratic crisis revisited: The dialectics of politicisation and depoliticisation. Nomos, pp. 191–209.

43. Stern, J. (2008). Sweden. In G. Kucsko-Stadlmayer, ed., European ombudsman-institutions: A comparative legal analysis regarding the multifaceted realization of an idea. Springer, pp. 409–416.

44. State Audit Office. (2023). Final report on the audit of financial statements and compliance audit for 2022 of the Ombudsman.

45. United Nations General Assembly. (1993) Resolution A/RES/48/134.

46. Zahid Sobaci, M. and Hatipoğlu, I. (2023). Ombudsmanship. In A. Farazmand, ed., Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy and governance. Springer, pp. 8720-8726.