Environmental Policy Implementation: Can We Reduce Failures Without Changing Objectives?

Tatyana Tomova; Elena Kalfova; Simeon Petrov; Kaloyan Haralampiev

doi:10.17573/cepar.2025.2.06

Authors

Tatyana Tomova Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, Bulgaria https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0680-3480
Elena Kalfova Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, Bulgaria https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9427-7451
Simeon Petrov Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, Bulgaria https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9652-5562
Kaloyan Haralampiev Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, Bulgaria https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7430-1867

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2025.2.06

Keywords:

policy tools, environmental policy implementation, implementation models, individual preferences regarding environmental policy tools, backward mapping implementation.

Abstract

Purpose: To demonstrate the necessity of reverse mapping in the implementation process of environmental policy.
Design/Methodology/Approach: A representative survey (of the adult population of Bulgaria) on pro-environmental behaviour and public attitudes towards relevant policies; data analysis conducted through ANOVA
and factor analysis.
Findings: There is a gap between public approval of ecological goals and support for concrete measures. Preferences regarding policy tools depend on their perceived beneficial or harmful impact on the material situation of individuals. No more than 30% of citizens are willing to pay for ecological improvements.
Practical Implications: Individual preferences should be monitored throughout the process of environmental policy implementation and used as evidence to inform changes in policy development.
Originality/Value: The notion that individual preferences regarding policy tools are significant in the implementation of environmental policy; the composite indicator of pro-environmental behaviour.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aghion, P. et al. (2010). Regulation and distrust. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(3), pp. 1015-1049. https://doi.org/10.1162 qjec.2010.125.3.1015.

Alemanno, А. and Sibony, А. (eds) (2015). Nudge and the Law. A European Perspective, Oxford: Hart Publishing.

Althaus, C., Bridgman, P. and Davis, G. (2017). The Australian policy handbook. A Practical Guide to the Policymaking Process, Sydney: Allen&Unwin.

Andersson, P. and Almqvist, G. (2022). Carrots, sticks, sermons or nudges? Survey evidence of the Swedish general public's attitude towards different public policy tools. Behavioural Public Policy, October 2022, pp. 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2022.31.

Ansell, C., Sørensen, E. and Torfing, J. (2017). Improving policy implementation through collaborative policymaking. Policy&Politics, 45(3), pp. 467-486. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557317X14972799760260.

Asara, V. et al. (2015). Socially sustainable degrowth as a social-ecological transformation: repoliticizing sustainability. Sustainability Science, 10(3), pp. 375-384. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11625-015-0321-9.

Bamberg, S. and Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta- analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), pp. 14-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002.

Banerjee, S., Savani, M. and Shreedhar, G. (2021). Public support for “soft” versus “hard” public policies: review of the evidence. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 4(2), pp. 1-24. https://doi.org/10.30636/ jbpa.42.220.

Banerjee, S. (2021). Rethinking the Origin of the Behavioural Policy Cube With Nudge Plus. In V. Mihaila, ed., Behavioral-Based Interventions for Improving Public Policies. IGI Global, Pennsylvania, USA, pp. 1-16.

Bardach, E. (1977) The Implementation Game: What Happens After a Bill Becomes Law. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Barrett, S. (2004). Implementation studies: time for a revival? Personal reflections on 20 years of implementation studies. Public administration, 82(2), pp. 249-262. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.0033-3298.2004.00393.x.

Bemelmans-Videc, M.L., Rist, R. and Vendung, E. (eds.) (1998). Carrots, Sticks, and Sermons: Policy Instruments & Their Evaluation. New Brunswick New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.

Benn, J. (2004). Consumer education between 'consumership' and citizenship: experiences from studies of young people. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 28(2), pp. 108–116. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2003.00364.x.

Binder, M. and Blankenberg, A.K. (2017). Green lifestyles and subjective well-being: More about self-image than actual behavior? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 137(C), pp. 304–323. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jebo.2017.03.009.

Blankenberg, A. and Harm, A. (2019). On the determinants of pro-environmental behavior: A literature review and guide for the empirical economist. University of Göttingen, Center for European, Governance, and Economic Development Research (CEGE), Number 350, October 2019.

Blocker, T. and Eckberg, D. (1997). Gender and envi- ronmentalism: Results from the 1993 general social survey. Social Science Quarterly, 78(4), pp. 841–58.

Bujold, P., Williamson, K., and Thulin, E. (2020). The Science of Changing Behavior for Environmental Outcomes: A Literature Review. Rare Center for Behavior & the Environment and the Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel to the Global Environment Facility.

Capano, G. et al. (2019). Making Policies Work: First- and Second- Order Mechanisms in Policy Design. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Pub. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788118194.

Carducci, A., Fiore, M. and Azara, A. et al. (2021). Pro-Environmental Behaviors: Determinants and Obstacles among Italian University Students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(6), pp. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18063306.

Casaló, L. And Escario, J. (2018). Heterogeneity in the association between environmental attitudes and pro-environmental behavior: A multilevel regression approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, pp. 155-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.237.

Chankrajang, T. and Muttarak, R. (2017). Green returns to education: Does schooling contribute to pro-environmental behaviours? evidence from Thailand. Ecological Economics, 131 (C), pp. 434-448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.09.015.

Di Porto, F. and Rangone, N. (2015). Behavioural Sciences in Practices. In A. Alemanno and A.Sibony, eds., Nudge and the Law. A European Perspective, Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 29-59.

Diekmann, A. and Preisendörfer, P. (2003). Green and Greenback: The Behavioral Effects of Environmental Attitudes in Low-Cost and High-Cost Situations. Rationality and Society, 15(4), pp. 441-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463103154002.

Dunlap R. et al. (2000). New trends in measuring environmen- tal attitudes: measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), pp. 425-442. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/0022-4537.00176.

Eisler, A., Eisler, H. and Yoshida, M. (2003). Perception of human ecology: cross-cultural and gender comparisons. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(1), pp. 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00083-X.

Elmore, R. (1979). Backward mapping: Implementation research and policy decisions. Political science quarterly 94(4), pp. 601-616. https://doi.org/10.2307/2149628

Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T. and Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of public administration research and theory, 22(1), pp. 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011.

Enste, D. and Potthoff, J. (2021). Behavioral economics and climate protection: Better regulation and green nudges for more sustainability. No. 146, IW-Analysen, 2021.

Frick, J., Kaiser, F. and Wilson, M. (2004). Environmental knowledge and conservation behavior: Exploring prevalence and structure in a representative sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(8), pp. 1597-1613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.02.015.

Grune-Yanoff, T. and Hertwig, R. (2016). Nudge Versus Boost: How Coherent are Policy and Theory? Minds and Machines: Journal for Artificial Intelligence, Philosophy and Cognitive Science, 26(1-2), pp. 149-183. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-015-9367-9.

Haselswerdt, J., and Bartels, B. (2015). Public opinion, policy tools, and the status quo: Evidence from a survey experiment. Political Research Quarterly, 68(3), pp. 607-621. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912915591217.

Hines, J., Hungerford, H. and Tomera, A. (1987). Analysis and Synthesis of Research on Responsible Environmental Behaviour: A Meta-Analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), pp. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1987.9943482.

Hood, C. (2007). Intellectual obsolescence and intellectual makeovers: reflections on the tools of govern- ment after two decades, Governance, 20(1), pp. 127-144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00347.x.

Howes, M. et al. (2017). Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure? Sustainability, 9(2), p. 165. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020165.

Howlett, M. (2019). Behavioural considerations in public policy: matching policy tools and their targets. In H. Straftheim and S. Beck, eds., Handbook of Behavioural Change and Public Policy. Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Leipzig, Germany, pp.78-88.

Howlett, M. (ed.) (2023). The Routledge handbook of policy tools. London and New York, NY: Routledge, 2023.

John, P. (2018). How Far to Nudge? Assessing Behavioural Public Policy, Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.

Johnson, C., Bowker, J., and Cordell, H. (2004). Ethnic variation in environmental belief and behavior: An examination of the new ecological paradigm in a social psychological context. Environment and behavior, 36(2), pp. 157– 186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916503251478.

Jolls, C. and Sunstein, C. (2005). Debiasing through Law. NBER Working Paper No. w11738. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Kaiser, F. (1998). A General Measure of Ecological Behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28 (5), pp. 395–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01712.x.

Kaiser, F. et al. (2003). Ecological behavior and its environmental consequences: a life cycle assessment of a self-report measure, Journal of Environmental Psychology 23(1), pp. 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00075-0.

Kamieniecki, S. and Kraft, M. (2012) The Oxford handbook of US environmental policy. Oxford University Press.

Kauder, B., Potrafke, N. and Ursprung, H. (2018). Behavioral determinants of proclaimed support for environment protection policies. European Journal of Political Economy, 54(1), pp. 26-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.01.005.

Klunin, A. et al. (2024). One Nudge Can Be Enough: Reducing Cigarette Butt Littlering in Public Areas. Central European Public Administration Review, 22(2), pp. 9–34. https://doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2024.2.01

Kollmuss, A. and Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), pp. 239-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401.

Kurisu, К. (2015). Pro-environmental Behaviors, Springer Japan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55834-7.

Laitos, J. and Okulski, J. (2017). Why environmental policies fail. Cambridge University Press.

Loer, K. and Neher, P. (2024). A behavioural approach to policy implementationin. In Sager, F., Mavrot, C., and Keiser, L., eds., Handbook of Public Policy Implementation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Longhi, S. (2013). Individual pro-environmental behaviour in the household context. ISER Working Paper Series, No. 2013-21, University of Essex, Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER), Colchester.

Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S. and Whitmarsh, L. (2007). Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global environmental change, 17(3), pp. 445–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.004.

Matland, R. (1995). Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of public administration research and theory, 5(2), pp. 145-174. https://doi.org/10.1093/0739-1166.0000025.

Mencinger, J. et al. (2017). Public Policy Design and Implementation in Slovenia. International Public Administration Review, 15(3-4), pp. 9–39. https://doi.org/10.17573/ipar.2017.3-4.01

Mónus, F. (2020). Environmental perceptions and pro-environmental behavior – comparing different measuring approaches. Environmental Education Research, 27(1), pp. 132–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1842332

Naru, F. (2024). Behavioral public policy bodies: New developments & lessons. Behavioral Science & Policy, 10(1), pp. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/23794607241285614.

Olejniczak, K., Kupiec,T. and Wojtowicz, D. (2025). Typology of Carrots, Sticks, and Sermons: Tracing Its Influence on the Discipline of Public Policy. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 21(50), pp. 63-74. https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v21i50.1171.

Pressman, J, and Wildavsky, A. (1984). Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland. Vol. 708, University of California Press.

Pülzl, H. and Treib, O. (2007). Implementing public policy. In F. Fischer and G. Miller, eds., Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics, and methods, Routledge, pp. 89-107.

Sager, F., Mavrot, C., and Keiser, L. (eds.) (2024). Handbook of Public Policy Implementation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Schipperges, M. (2019). Soziale Milieus in Deutschland Das Modell der sozialen Milieus von sociodimensions, Institute for Socio-cultural Research, Heidelberg.

Schmitt, M. et al. (2018). Unpacking the relationships between pro- environmental behavior, life satisfaction, and perceived ecological threat. Ecological Economics, 143, pp. 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.07.007 /

Schneider, A. and Ingram, H. (1990). Behavioral assumptions of policy tools. The journal of politics, 52(2), pp. 510-529. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131904.

Shafir, E. (2012) The Behavioral Foundations of Public Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Shen, J., and Saijo, T. (2008). Reexamining the relations between socio-demographic characteristics and individual environmental concern: Evidence from Shanghai data. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(1), pp. 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.10.003.

Stern, P. (2000). New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behaviour. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), pp. 407-424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175.

Stern, P., Dietz, T. and Kalof, L. (1993). Value orien- tations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment and behavior, 25(5), pp. 322-348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916593255002.

Sunstein, C. (2014) Why nudge? The politics of libertarian paternalism. Yale University Press.

Thaler, R. and Sunstein, C. (2003). Libertarian Paternalism. American Economic Review, 93(2), pp. 175-179. https://doi.org/ 10.1257/000282803321947001.

United Nations (UN) (2015). Sustainable Development Goals. United Nations: New York, NY, USA.

Wan, C., Shen, G., and Yu, A. (2015). Key determinants of willingness to support policy measures on recycling: A case study in Hong Kong. Environmental Science & Policy, 54, pp. 409-418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.06.023.

Wenzelburger, G. and Hörisch, F. (2015). Framing Effects and Comparative Social Policy Reform: Comparing Blame Avoidance Evidence from Two Experiments. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 18(2), pp. 157-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2015.1053743.

Whitmarsh, L. and O’Neill, S. (2010). Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in de- termining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), pp. 305-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.003.

Wielicka-Regulska, A. (2020). The relationship between consumer behaviour, attitudes and acceptance of public policy tools advancing sustainable food consumption. Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, 20(2), pp. 436-450. https://doi.org/10.2478/foli-2020-0058.

Zelezny, L., Chua, P.P. and Aldrich, C. (2000). Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. Journal of Social issues, 56(3), pp. 443–457. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00177.