Interakcija med parkom in ljudmi v gorati Gruziji
Primer Narodnega parka Kazbegi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4312/dela.55.69-86Ključne besede:
zavarovana območja, zaupanje, upravljanje, sodelovalno kartiranje, lokalna participacija, Narodni park KazbegiPovzetek
Prispevek predstavlja širitev Narodnega parka Kazbegi in poskuša raziskati dejavnike, ki oblikujejo ali zavirajo vzpostavljanje zaupanja med predstavniki parka in deležniki. Raziskava je uporabila kvalitativno metodologijo. Z uporabo sodelovalnega kartiranja je omogočila intervjuvancem povezati prostorsko informacijo z območji širitve. Celovito geografsko pokritje in kar največja raznolikost intervjuvancev sta omogočila reprezentativnost zbranih podatkov. V splošnem prispevek predstavlja različne primere in povzema podobnosti in razlike pri vzpostavljanju zaupanja v času širitve zavarovanih območij na Kavkazu in drugih območjih.
Prenosi
Literatura
Adiyia, B., Vanneste, D., Van Rompaey, A., 2017. The poverty alleviation potential of tourism employment as an off-farm activity on the local livelihoods surrounding Kibale National Park, western Uganda. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 17, 1, pp. 34–51. DOI: 10.1177/1467358416634156.
Agency of Protected Areas, 2019. Visitor statistics by years. URL: https://apa.gov.ge (accessed 12.12.2019).
Agency of protected areas, 2020. Rawasi axali daculi teritoria daarsdeba [რაჭაში ახალი დაცული ტერიტორია დაარსდება / A new protected area will be established in Racha]. URL: https://apa.gov.ge/ge/media/News/rachashi-axali-daculi-teritoria-daarsdeba.page?fbclid=IwAR0etXjO0uAeZAg8LKAghjQXMlCAi7s1CGWkNhPy-U7wDp12oLP0mH2Rh6A (accessed 10.04.2021).
Agency of protected areas, 2021. Saqartvelosi kidev erti erovnuli parkis seqmna igegmeba! [საქართველოში კიდევ ერთი ეროვნული პარკის შექმნა იგეგმება! / Another national park is planned to be established in Georgia!]. URL: https://apa.gov.ge/ge/media/News/saqartveloshi-kidev-erti-erovnuli-parkis-sheqmna-igegmeba.page?fbclid=IwAR2fNSa8tzIpD2W_Ttfc8Ght-XpYg72-xzu2AyyOlG_78lt05jIQCd5E2is (accessed 10.04.2021).
Bakuradze, T., Gvilava, M., Nikolaishvili, D., Mosulishvili, M., Kandaurov, A., Khoshtaria, D., Sartania, D., Kenkebashvili, S., Karichashvili, A., 2016. Baseline study report - Kazbegi National Park.
Böker, M. U., Kollmair, M., 2000. Livelihood strategies and local perceptions of a new nature conservation project in Nepal. Mountain Research and Development, 20, 4, pp. 324–331. DOI: 10.1659/0276.
Davenport, M. A., Leahy, J. E., Anderson, D. H., Jakes, P. J., 2007. Building trust in natural resource management within local communities: A case study of the Midewin National Tallgrass Prairie. Environmental Management, 39, 3, pp. 353–368. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-006-0016-1.
De Koning, M., Nguyen, T., Lockwood, M., Sengchanthavong, S., Phommasane, S., 2017. Collaborative governance of protected areas: Success factors and prospects for Hin Nam No National Protected Area, Central Laos. Conservation and Society, 15, 1, pp. 87–99. DOI: 10.4103/0972-4923.201396.
De Pourcq, K., Thomas, E., Arts, B., Vranckx, A., Léon-Sicard, T., Van Damme, P., 2015. Conflict in protected areas: Who says co-management does not work? PLoS ONE, 10, 12. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144943.
De Pourcq, K., Thomas, E., Arts, B., Vranckx, A., Léon-Sicard, T., Van Damme, P., 2017. Understanding and resolving conflict between local communities and conservation authorities in Colombia. World Development, 93, pp. 125–135. DOI: 10.1016/J.WORLDDEV.2016.12.026.
Dieterich, T., 2018. Biodiversity monitoring and conservation programs for Kazbegi National Park, Georgia, Caucasus. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20888.14087.
Gaprindashvili, M., 2018. Mosaxleobis cartulobisa da molodinebis kvleva rawis gegmarebiti erovnuli parkis teritoriaze [მოსახლეობის ჩართულობისა და მოლოდინების კვლევა რაჭის გეგმარებითი ეროვნული პარკის ტერიტორიაზე / Protected Areas – A source of conflict or a means of resolving a conflict]. Ilia State University.
Gloveli, Q., 2017. Daculi teritoriebi - konfliqtis wyaro tu konfliqtis gadawris sasualeba. Ilias saxelmwifo universiteti. [დაცული ტერიტორიები - კონფლიქტის წყარო თუ კონფლიქტის გადაჭრის საშუალება / Study of the population engagement and expectations in the territory of Racha National Park]. Ilia State University.
Goldman, M., 2011. Strangers in their own land: Maasai and wildlife conservation in Northern Tanzania. Conservation and Society, 9, 1, pp. 65–79. DOI: 10.4103/0972-4923.79194.
Gugushvili, T., Salukvadze, G., Salukvadze, J., 2017. Fragmented development: Tourism-driven economic changes in Kazbegi, Georgia. Annals of Agrarian Science, 15, 1, pp. 49–54. DOI: 10.1016/j.aasci.2017.02.005.
Juffe-Bignoli, D., Bingham, H., MacSharry, B., Deguignet, M., Lewis, E., Milam, A., Kingston, N., 2017. World database on protected areas user manual 1.5. Cambridge: UNEP-WCMC.
Kuckartz, U., 2014. Qualitative text analysis: A guide to methods, practice and using software. London etc.: Sage.
Marcus, K., 2016. The fundamental role of large-scale trust building in natural resource management. Environmental Values, 25, 3, pp. 259–286. DOI: 10.3197/096327116X14598445991385.
Michel, H., Backhaus, N., 2019. Unravelling reasons for the non-establishment of protected areas: justification regimes and principles of worth in a Swiss national park project. Environmental Values, 28, 2, pp. 171–190. DOI: 10.3197/096327119x15515267418511.
Michel, H. A., Wallner, A., 2020. How can local populations be won over to protected areas? Swiss academies factsheets, 15, 5.
Müller-Böker, U., Kollmair, M., 2000. Livelihood strategies and local perceptions of a new nature conservation project in Nepal. Mountain Research and Development, 20, 4, pp. 324–331. DOI: 10.1659/0276-4741(2000)020[0324:LSALPO]2.0.CO;2.
Narayanasamy, N., 2009. Participatory rural appraisal: Principles, methods and application. New Delhi etc.: SAGE Publications Inc. DOI: 10.4135/9788132108382.
Nastran, M., Pirnat, J., 2012. Stakeholder participation in planning of the protected natural areas: Slovenia. Sociologija i Prostor, 50, 2, pp. 141–164. DOI: 10.5673/sip.50.2.1.
National Statistics Office of Georgia (GEOSTAT), 2014. General Population Census.
Nepal, S. K., 1997. Sustainable tourism, protected areas and livelihood needs of local communities in developing countries. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 4, 2, pp. 123–135. DOI: 10.1080/13504509709469948.
Patton, M. Q., 2015. Qualitative research and evaluation methods : Integrating theory and practice, fourth ed. Los Angeles etc.: Sage.
Perrotton, A., de Garine-Wichatitsky, M., Valls-Fox, H., Lepage, C., 2017. My cattle and your park: Codesigning a role-playing game with rural communities to promote multistakeholder dialogue at the edge of protected areas. Ecology and Society, 22, 1. DOI: 10.5751/ES-08962-220135.
Puntscher, S., Huy, D. T., Walde, J., Tappeiner, U., Tappeiner, G., 2017. The acceptance of a protected area and the benefits of sustainable tourism: In search of the weak link in their relationship. Working Papers in Economics and Statistics, 2017-08.
Ramphal, S., 1993. Para nosotros la patria es el planeta tierra. In: Parks for life: Report of the IVth World Congress on national parks and protected areas, pp. 56–58.
Sarkki, S., Rantala, L., Karjalainen, T. P., 2015. Local people and protected areas: Identifying problems, potential solutions and further research questions. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 14, 3, pp. 299–314. DOI: 10.1504/IJESD.2015.070137.
Stern, M., 2004. Understanding local reactions to protected areas. In: Hamú, D., Auchincloss, E., Goldstein, W. (eds.). Communicating protected areas. IUCN, pp. 40–46.
Stern, M. J., 2008a. The power of trust: Toward a theory of local opposition to neighboring protected areas. Society and Natural Resources, 21, 10, pp. 859–875. DOI: 10.1080/08941920801973763.
Stern, M. J., 2008b. Coercion, voluntary compliance and protest: The role of trust and legitimacy in combating local opposition to protected areas. Environmental Conservation, 35, 3, pp. 200–210. DOI: 10.1017/S037689290800502X.
Treffny, R., Beilin, R., 2011. Gaining legitimacy and losing trust: Stakeholder participation in ecological risk assessment for marine protected area management. Environmental Values, 20, 3, pp. 417–438. DOI: 10.3197/096327111X13077055166144.
Tskvitinidze, A., 2020. Challenges and opportunities of mountain tourism development in Georgia (Case of Kazbegi). In: Maurer, C., Siller, H. J. (eds.). ISCONTOUR 2020 Tourism Research Perspectives Proceedings of the International Student Conference in Tourism Research.
Turner, R. A., Addison, J., Arias, A., Bergseth, B. J., Marshall, N. A., Morrison, T. H., Tobin, R. C., 2016. Trust, confidence, and equity affect the legitimacy of natural resource governance. Ecology and Society, 21, 3. DOI: 10.5751/ES-08542-210318.
West, P., Igoe, J., Brockington, D., 2006. Parks and peoples: the social impact of protected areas. Annual Review of Anthropology, 35, 1, pp. 251–277. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123308.
Prenosi
Objavljeno
Kako citirati
Številka
Rubrike
Licenca
Avtorske pravice (c) 2021 Gvantsa Salukvadze, Temur Gugushvili, Tamar Dolbaia, Joseph Salukvadze, Nino Durglishvili

To delo je licencirano pod Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva-Deljenje pod enakimi 4.0 mednarodno licenco.
Avtorji, ki želijo, da se njihov članek objavi v reviji, se strinjajo z naslednjimi pogoji:
- Pisci besedila potrjujejo, da so avtorji oddanega članka, ki bo predvidoma izšel v reviji Dela v okviru Znanstvene založbe Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (Univerza v Ljubljani, Filozofska fakulteta, Aškerčeva 2, 1000 Ljubljana) z navedbo mojega avtorstva z imenom in priimkom. O likovno-grafični in tehnični opremi dela ter o pogojih njegovega trženja odloča založnik.
- Avtorji jamčijo, da je delo njihova avtorska stvaritev, da na njem ne obstajajo pravice tretjih oseb in da z njim niso kršene kakšne druge pravice. V primeru zahtevkov tretjih oseb se avtorji zavezujejo, da bodo varovali interese založnika ter mu povrnil škodo in stroške.
- Avtorji obdržijo materialne avtorske pravice ter založniku priznajo pravico do prve izdaje članka z licenco Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (priznanje avtorstva in deljenje pod istimi pogoji). To pomeni, da se tako besedilo, slike, grafi in druge sestavine dela lahko prosto distribuirajo, reproducirajo, uporabljajo, priobčujejo javnosti in predelujejo, pod pogojem, da se jasno in vidno navede avtorja in naslov tega dela in da se v primeru spremembe, preoblikovanja ali uporabe tega dela v svojem delu, lahko distribuira predelava le pod licenco, ki je enaka tej.
- Avtorji lahko sklenejo dodatne ločene pogodbene dogovore za neizključno distribucijo različice dela, objavljene v reviji, (npr. oddaja v institucionalni repozitorij ali objava v knjigi) z navedbo, da je bilo delo prvič objavljeno v tej reviji.
- Pred postopkom pošiljanja ali med njim lahko avtorji delo objavijo na spletu (npr. v institucionalnih repozitorijih ali na svojih spletnih straneh), k čemur jih tudi spodbujamo, saj lahko to prispeva k plodnim izmenjavam ter hitrejšemu in obsežnejšemu navajanju objavljenega dela.