Sayburç a mid-9th millennium BC site in the foothills of the Eastern Taurus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4312/dp.51.23Keywords:
Early PPNB, Eastern Taurus, Neolithic architecture, special buildings, Sayburç reliefsAbstract
A Pre-Pottery Neolithic site at Sayburç is currently being studied as part of the Şanlıurfa Neo-lithic Research Project – Taş Tepler (Türkiye), which is focused on the Neolithic Period at the Şanlıurfa Plateau. The settlement belongs to the early sedentary societies on the plateau, characterized by monumental buildings, T-shaped pillars, and rich symbolic elements that distinguish the region from its contemporaries in Southwest Asia. A growing body of evidence indicates that rituals and the associated symbolism and narratives play a pivotal role in the formation of the region’s early sedentary societies. The construction of special buildings in Sayburç, situated close to dwellings and accompanied by associated symbolism, illustrates the intertwining of the sacred with everyday life. This paper presents the preliminary results of the first three years of research on the site and discusses the cultural dimension of the region itself.
Downloads
References
Becker J., Beuger C., and Müller-Neuhof B. 2019. Human Iconography and Symbolic Meaning in Near Eastern Prehistory: An Introduction. In J. Becker, C. Beuger, and B. Müller-Neuhof (eds.), Human Iconography and Symbolic Meaning in Near Eastern Prehistory. Austrian Academy of Sciences. Vienna: 11–24.
Benz M. 2017. Changing Medialities. Symbols of Neolithic Corporate Identities. In M. Benz, H. G. K. Gebel, and T. Watkins (eds.), Neolithic Corporate Identities. Studies in Early Near Eastern Production, Subsistence, and Environment 20. ex oriente. Berlin: 135–156. https://www.exoriente.org/docs/00100.pdf
Benz M. and Bauer J. 2013. Symbols of Power – Symbols of Crisis? A Psycho-social Approach to Early Neolithic Symbol System. Neo-Lithics 2013(2): 11–24.
Benz M., Deckers K., Rössner C., +7 authors, and Özkaya V. 2015. Prelude to Village Life. Environmental Data and Building Traditions of the Epipalaeolithic Settlement at Körtik Tepe, Southeastern Turkey. Paléorient 41(2): 9–30. https://www.persee.fr/doc/paleo_0153-9345_2015_num_41_2_5673
Benz M., Gebel H. G. K., and Watkins T. 2017. The Construction of Neolithic Corporate Identities. Introduction. In M. Benz, H. G. K. Gebel, and T. Watkins (eds.), Neolithic Corporate Identities. Studies in Early Near Eastern Production, Subsistence, and Environment 20. ex oriente. Berlin:1–9.
Clare L. 2020. Göbekli Tepe, Turkey. A Brief Summary of Research at a New World Heritage Site (2015– 2019). e-Forschungsberichte 2: 81–87.
Clare L., Dietrich O., Gresky J., Notroff J., Peters J., and Pöllath N. 2019. Ritual Practices and Conflict Mitigation at Early Neolithic Körtik Tepe and Göbekli Tepe, Upper Mesopotamia: A Mimetic Theoretical Approach. In I. Hodder (ed.), Violence and the Sacred in the Ancient Near East: Girardian Conversations at Çatalhöyük. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge: 96–128.
Çelik B., Tolon K. 2018. Yeni Bulgular Işɩğɩnda Urfa’da Neolitik Dönem. Seleucia 8: 211–232.
Dietrich O., Heun M., Notroff J., Schmidt K., and Zarnkow M. 2012. The Role of Cult and Feasting in the Emergence of Neolithic communities. New evidence from Gobekli Tepe, South- eastern Turkey. Antiquity 86(333): 674–695. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00047840
Dietrich O., Notroff J., Dietrich L., and Schmidt K. 2017 Feasting, Social Complexity, and the Emergence of the Early Neolithic of Upper Mesopotamia: A View from Göbeklitepe. In R. J. Chacon, R. G. Mendoza (eds.), Feast, Famine or Fighting? Multiple Pathways to Social Complexity. Springer. New York: 91–132
Erdalkɩran M., Uludağ C., and Avcɩ C. 2023. Gürcütepe 2023 Yɩlɩ Kazɩsɩ. 42. Kazɩ Sonuçlarɩ Toplantɩsɩ 4: 73–184.
Finlayson B., Mithen S. J., Najjar M., Smith S., Maričević D., Pankhurst N. and Yeomans L. 2011. Architecture, Sedentism, and Social Complexity at Pre-Pottery Neolithic A WF16, Southern Jordan. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 108(20): 8183–8188. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1017642108
Hauptmann H. 1993. Ein Kult Gebaüde in Nevali Cöri. In M. Frangipane, H. Hauptmann, M. Liverani, P. Matthiae, and M. Mellink (eds.), Between the Rivers and Over the Mountains. Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza. Rome: 37–69.
Hodder I., Pels P. 2010. History Houses: a New Interpretation of Architectural Elaboration at Çatalhöyük. In I. Hodder (ed.), Religion in the Emergence of Civilization: Çatalhöyük as a Case Study. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge:163–186.
Hodder I., Meskell L. 2011. A Curious and Sometimes a Trifle Macabre Artistry. Some Aspects of Symbolism in Neolithic Turkey. Current Anthropology 52(2): 235–263. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/659250
Karul N. 2021. Buried Buildings at Pre Pottery Neolithic Karahantepe. Türk Arkeoloji ve Etnografya Dergisi 86: 19–31.
Karul N. 2022. Karahantepe Çalɩşmalarɩna Genel Bir Bakɩş. Arkeoloji ve Sanat 169: 1–8.
Karul N., Semiz N., and Polat N. 2023. Karahantepe 2019–2021 Çalɩşmalarɩ. 42. Kazɩ Sonuçlarɩ Toplantɩsɩ 4: 205–220.
Kodaş E. 2023. The younger Dryas Layer at Boncuklu Tarla and the Beginning of village life in the upper Tigris Basin. Archaeological Research in Asya 35(1):1000460.
Kodaş E., Genç B., Çiftçi Y., Labendan-Kodaş C. and Erdem Ç. 2020. Çemka Höyük: A late epipaleolithic and pre-pottery Neolithic site on the upper Tigris, southeast Anatolia. Neo-Lithics 20: 40–46. https://www.exoriente.org/repository/NEO-LITHICS/e_NEO-LITHICS_2020_Kodas.pdf
Kuijt I. 2008. The Regeneration of Life: Neolithic Structures of Symbolic Remembering and Forgetting. Current Anthropology 49(2): 171–197. https://doi.org/10.1086/526097
Makarewicz C. A., Finlayson B. 2018. Constructing Community in the Neolithic of Southern Jordan: Quotidian Practice in Communal Architecture. PLoS ONE 13(6): e0193712. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193712
Özbaşaran M., Duru G. 2011. Akarçay Tepe, A PPNB and PN Settlement in Middle Euphrates Urfa. In. M. Özdoğan, N. Başgelen, and P. Kuniholm (eds.), Neolithic in Turkey: New Excavations and New Research The Euphrates Basin. Archaeology and Art Publications. İstanbul: 261–265.
Özdoğan E. 2016. Neolithic Beads of Anatolia: An Overview. In Ü. Yalçɩn (ed.), Anatolian Metal VII Anatolien un seine Nachbarn vor 10.000 Jahren. Anatolia and neighbors 10.000 years ago. Bergbau-Museum Bochum. Grafisches Centrum Cuno GmbH & Co. KG. Bochum-Bonn: 135–151.
Özdoğan E. 2022. The Sayburç Reliefs: a Narrative Scene From the Neolithic. Antiquity 96(390): 1599– 1605. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2022.125
Özdoğan E., Uludağ C. 2022. Sayburç: Şanlɩurfa’da Yenir Bir Çanak Çömleksiz Neolitik Dönem Yerleşimi. Arkeoloji ve Sanat 169: 9–24.
Özdoğan E., Uludağ C. 2024. Sayburç 2022 Yɩlɩ Çalɩşmalarɩ. 43. Kazɩ Sonuçlarɩ Toplantɩsɩ (5): 99–114.
Özdoğan E., Karul N. 2020. Neolitik Teriminin Kavramsal Değişimi ve Güneydoğu Anadolu’da Neolitik Araştɩrmalarɩn Dünü-Bugünü. Arkeoloji ve Sanat 163: 1–28.
Özdoğan E., Uludağ C., and Polat N. 2023. Sayburç 2021 İlk Dönem Çalɩşmalarɩ. 42. Kazɩ Sonuçlarɩ Toplantɩsɩ (2): 307–322.
Özdoğan M. 1995. Yakɩn Doğu Neolitiği ve Güneydoğu Anadolu: Eleştirisel Bir Değerlendirme. In N. Başgelen (ed.), Eski Yakɩndoğu Kültürü Üzerine İncelemeler In Memoriam İ. Metin Akyurt – Bahattin Devam Anɩ Kitabɩ. Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayɩnlarɩ. İstanbul: 267–280.
Özdoğan M. 2011. Mezraa Teleilat. In M. Özdoğan, N. Başgelen, and P. Kuniholm (eds.), Neolithic in Turkey: New Excavations and New Research. The Euphrates Basin. Archaeology and Art Publications. İstanbul: 203–260.
Özdoğan M. 2017. The Archaeology of Early Farming in Southeastern Turkey. In Y. Enzel, O. Bar-Yosef (eds.), Quaternary of the Levant. Environments. Climate Change and Humans. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge: 723–731.
Özdoğan M. 2018. Defining the Presence of an Elite Social Class in Prehistory. In Ü. Yalçɩn (ed.), Anatolian Metal VIII. Eliten – Handwerk – Prestigegüter. Der ANSCHNITT. Beiheft 39. Veröffentlichungen aus dem Deutschen Bergbau-Museum Bochum. Nr. 226. VML Verlag Marie Leidorf GmbH. Rahden/Westf.: 29–42.
Özdoğan M. 2022. Reconsidering the Early Neolithic of Anatolia. Recent Recoveries. Some Excerpts and Generalities. L’Anthropologie 126(3):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anthro.2022.103033
Özdoğan M., Özdoğan A. 1990. Çayönü a Conspectus of Recent Work. In O. Aurenche, M.-C. Cauvin, and P. Sanlaville (eds.), Préhistoire du Levant: processus des changements culturels. Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. Paris: 68–77.
Özdoğan M., Başgelen N., and Kuniholm P. 2011a (eds.). The Neolithic in Turkey The Euphrates Basin. Archaeology and Art Publications. İstanbul.
Özdoğan M., Başgelen N., and Kuniholm P. 2011b (eds.). The Neolithic in Turkey The Tigris Basin. Archaeology and Art Publications. İstanbul.
Peters J., Schmidt K. 2004. Animals in the symbolic world of Pre-Pottery Neolithic Göbekli Tepe, South-eastern Turkey: a preliminary assessment. In P. Bonte, A.-M Brɩsebarre, D. Helmer, and H. Sɩdɩ Maamar (eds.), Domestications animales: dimensions sociales et symboliques. Hommages à Jacques Cauvin, Villeurbanne, 21–23 novembre 2002. Anthropozoologica 39(1): 179–218.
Rollefson G. O. 2000. Ritual and social structure at Neolithic ‘Ain Ghazal. In I Kuijt (ed.), Life in Neolithic Farming Communities: Social Organization, Identity, and Differentiation. Kluwer Academic/Plenum. New York:165–190.
Rosenberg M., Erim-Özdoğan A. 2011. The Neolithic in Southeastern Anatolia. In S. Steadman, G. Mc Mahon (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Anatolia, 10,000–323 B.C.E. University Press. New York: 125–149.
Schmidt K. 2005. “Ritual Centers” and the Neolithisation of Upper Mesopotamia. Neolithics 2(05): 13– 21. https://www.exoriente.org/repository/NEO-LITHICS/NEO-LITHICS_2005_2.pdf
Schmidt K. 2006. Sie bauten die ersten Tempel: das rätselhafte Heiligtum der Steinzeitjäger. Die archäologische Entdeckung am Göbekli Tepe. C.H. Beck. München.
Schmidt K. 2010. Göbekli Tepe – the Stone Age Sanctuaries. New Results of Ongoing Excavations with a Special Focus on Sculptures and High Reliefs. Documenta Praehistorica 37: 239–256. https://doi.org/10.4312/dp.37.21
Sütterlin C. 2017. Cultural Memory: Symbols, Monuments and Rituals Sustaining Group Identity. In M. Benz, H. G. Gebel, and T. Watkins (eds.), Neolithic Corporate Identities. Studies in Early Near Eastern Production, Subsistence, and Environment 20. ex oriente. Berlin: 35–52. https://www.exoriente.org/docs/00100.pdf
Şahin F., Uludağ C., Özçelik K., and Sevindik Y. E. 2023. Şanlɩurfa Merkez ve Çevresi Tarihöncesi Dönem Arkeolojik Yüzey Araştɩrmasɩ (ŞAYA) 2021 Yɩlɩ İlk Sezon Sonularɩ. In C. Keskin (ed.), 42. Uluslararasɩ Kazɩ, Araştɩrma Ve Arkeometri Sempozyumu. 38 Ataştɩrma Sonuçlarɩ Toplantɩsɩ. Cilt 1. 23–27 Mayɩs 2022. Denizli. T.C. Kültür Ve Turizm Bakanlɩğɩ Ana Yayɩn No: 3735/1. Kültür Varlɩklarɩ ve Müzeler Genel Müdürlüğü No: 196/1. Ankara: 477–497.
Verhoeven M. 2002. Ritual and Ideology in the Pre-Pottery Neolithic B of the Levant and Southeast Anatolia. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 12(2): 233– 258. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774302000124
Watkins T. 2015. Ritual Performance and Religion in Early Neolithic Societies. In N. Laneri (ed.), Defining the Sacred Approaches to the Archaeology of Religion in the Near East. Oxbow Books. Oxford, Philadelphia:153–160.
Whitehouse H., Hodder I. 2010 Modes of Religiosity at Çatalhöyük. In I. Hodder (ed), Religion in the Emergence of Civilization. Çatalhöyük as a Case Study. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge: 122–145.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Eylem Özdoğan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.