Contemporary Musicology and the Study of Musical Practices in Slovenia

Authors

  • Matjaž Barbo University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, Slovenia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4312/mz.56.2.35-50

Keywords:

musicology, contemporary musicology, Slovenian musicology

Abstract

Musicology in Slovenia is gradually evolving from a historiographical discipline into a system of intersecting research in the fields of reception history, institutional history, structural and genre analysis, acoustics, critical reflection, semiological analysis, hermeneutical reflection and epistemology. The discontinuities and inhomogeneities we perceive today can even be understood as one of the modes of contemporary musicology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Beard, David, and Kenneth Gloag. Musicology: The Key Concepts. London and New York: Routledge, 2005.

Bock, Emil. Die Philharmonische Gesellschaft in Laibach: 1702–1902. Ljubljana: Direktion der Philharmonischen Gesellschaft, 1902.

Bohlman, Philip V. “Musicology as a Political Act.” Journal of Musicology 11 (1993): 411–436.

Born, Georgina. “For a Relational Musicology: Music and Interdisciplinarity: Beyond the Practice Turn.” Journal of the Royal Musical Association 135, no. 2 (2010): 205–243.

Bujić, Bojan. “A Hundred or so Years of Musicology: What have we Learned?” In Glazba prijelaza: Svečani zbornik za Evu Sedak/Music of Transition: Essays in Honour of Eva Sedak, edited by Nikša Gligo, Dalibor Davidović, and Nada Bezić, 61–68. Zagreb: ArTresor/HRT, Zagreb, 2009.

Cook, Nicholas, and Mark Everist, eds. Rethinking Music. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

Cook, Nicholas. “We are All (Ethno)musicologists Now.” In The New (Ethno)musicologies, edited by Henry Stobart, 48–70. Lanham, Md.: Scarecrow Press, 2008.

Covach, John. “Popular music, Unpopular Musicology.” In Rethinking Music, edited by Nicholas Cook and Mark Everist (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), 452–470.

Cvetko, Dragotin. “Današnje stanje slovenske muzikologije.” Muzikološki zbornik 13 (1977): 5–13.

Cvetko, Dragotin. “Kulturni pomen sodobne in posebej slovenske univerze.” Sodobnost 4, no. 10 (1936): 470–475.

Cvetko, Dragotin. “Muzikologija.” In Petdeset let slovenske univerze v Ljubljani: 1919–1969, edited by Roman Modic, 279–282. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani, 1969.

Cvetko, Dragotin. “Uvodna beseda.” Muzikološki zbornik 1 (1965): 5–7.

Eggebrecht, Hans Heinrich. “Konzeptionen.” In Bericht über den Internationalen Musikwissenschaftlichen Kongreß Bonn 1970, edited by Carl Dahlhaus, Hans-Joachim Marx, Magda Marx-Weber, and Günther Massenkeil, 648–650. Kassel: Bärenreiter, [1971].

Goehr, Lydia. The Imaginary Museum of Musical Works: An Essay in the Philosophy of Music. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.

Keesbacher, Friedrich. Die Philharmonische Gesellschaft in Laibach seit dem Jahre ihrer Gründung 1702 bis zu ihrer letzten Umgestaltung 1862: Eine geschichtliche Skizze. Ljubljana, 1862.

Loos, Helmut. E-Musik - Kunstreligion der Moderne: Beethoven und andere Götter. Kassel: Bärenreiter, 2017.

Radics, Peter. Frau Musica in Krain: Kulturgeschichtliche Skizze. Ljubljana, 1877.

Sivec, Jože. “Razvoj in dosežki glasbenega zgodovinopisja na Slovenskem.” Muzikološki zbornik 17 (1981): 145–181. https://doi.org/10.4312/mz.17.2.145-181.

Stele, France. “Stanko Vurnik: Uvod v glasbo; I. Sistematični del.” Dom in svet 42, no. 5 (1929): 157.

Steska, Viktor. “Academia Philo-Harmonicorum v Ljubljani: Ob dvestoletnici (1702–1902).” Dom in svet 15, no. 4 (1902): 234–237. http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:DOC-21X3C5PZ.

Tomlinson, Gary. “Musicology, Anthropology, History.” In The Cultural Study of Music: A Critical Introduction, edited by Martin Clayton, Trevor Herbert and Richard Middleton, 31–44. London: Routledge, 2003.

Vurnik, Stanko. “Polemika k poglavju o pojmovno-spekulativnem in historičnem spoznavanju umetnosti.” Dom in svet 40, no. 8 (1927): 278–281.

Downloads

Published

30. 12. 2020

How to Cite

Barbo, M. (2020). Contemporary Musicology and the Study of Musical Practices in Slovenia. Musicological Annual, 56(2), 35-50. https://doi.org/10.4312/mz.56.2.35-50