Profiling of the Ethical Concepts Good / Evil and Justice from the Etymological Perspective

Authors

  • Eldar Veremchuk Zaporizhzhia National University, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4312/vestnik.13.191-206

Keywords:

concept, domain, landmark, profiling, trajector

Abstract

The paper gives a comprehensive insight into the peculiarities of concept profiling through defining the related etymological domains. The aim of the paper is to reveal the peculiarities of the profiling of the concepts GOOD / EVIL and JUSTICE through elucidating their source domains from an etymological perspective. The choice of the analysed ethical concepts is stipulated by their higher contextual actualization frequency, as compared with the other ethical concepts, according to the data obtained from British National Corpus. The research method of trajector / landmark alignment used in this work is based on R. Langacker’s views on the profiling of concepts in language utterances and on the tenets of Conceptual Metaphor Theory. The novelty of this approach consists in the fact that it was elaborated and tailored for the analysis and explanation of the onomasiological principles of ‘wrapping’ abstract ethical concepts into the language form. The underlying idea is that abstract categories were conceptualized on the basis of background central life experience and knowledge of concrete things. It is argued that such things were the source domains in ontological cross-domain mappings for the target ethical concepts. The current research into the source domain etymons of the ethical categories made it possible to determine the underlying images, which are the core for drawing metaphorical correspondences between source and target concepts. The etymological layer of source domain lexicalizers revealed the intrinsic psychological mechanisms of human cognition and perception of the world, which consist in the inherent proclivity of the human mind to make metaphorical parallels in the direction from daily, central experience to complex abstract ideas and notions. The results made it possible to develop the matrix model of the analysed concepts, which was further developed into a ‘conceptual edifice’ multi-layer model, which reveals the conceptualization paths along which the human mind classifies and categorizes abstract ethical ideas. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

CHOMSKY, Noam (ed.) (1997) Language and Cognition. (The Future of the Cognitive Revolution). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

EVANS, Vyvyan/Melanie GREEN (2006) Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

FILLMORE, Charles (ed.) (1982) Frame semantics. The Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Co. 111–137.

GOLIANICH, Maria (2007) Inner form of the word and discourse. Ivano-Frankivsk: Prikarpatskiy National University Press.

GOLOVENKO, Kristina (2012) Inner form of the word as an imaginative feature. Kirovograd: Bulletin of Kirovograd National University.

LAKOFF, George (1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 202–251.

LAKOFF, George/Mark JOHNSON (2003) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

LANGACKER, Ronald (1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

LANGACKER, Ronald (2000) A course in cognitive grammar. Manuscript. Preliminary draft. San Diego: University of California San Diego Press.

POTEBNIA, Aleksandr (1993) Thought and language. Kiev: SYNTO.

ROSCH, Eleanor (1978) Principles of categorization. E. Rosch/B. Lloyd (ed.), Cognition and Categorization. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 27–48.

SCRAGG, Greg (1976) Semantic nets as memory models. E. Charniak/Y. Wilks (ed.), Computational Semantics. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co., 101–127.

SPHET, Gustav (2006) The Inner Form of the Word: Studies and Variations on Humboldt’s Themes. Moscow: Kom-Kniga.

ZHABOTINSKAYA, Svetlana (2009) Concept / Domain: Matrix and Network Models. Culture of the peoples of the Black Sea region 168, 254–259.

*******

An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary Online. 18. August 2021. https://bosworthtoller.com/.

Etymology Dictionary Online. 15. August 2021. https://www.etymonline.com/.

Glosbe Dictionary Online. 21. August 2021. https://ru.glosbe.com/la/ru/.

Longman Dictionary Online. 13. August 2021. https://www.ldoceonline.com/.

Downloads

Published

27.12.2021

How to Cite

Veremchuk, E. (2021). Profiling of the Ethical Concepts Good / Evil and Justice from the Etymological Perspective. Journal for Foreign Languages, 13(1), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.4312/vestnik.13.191-206

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 1 (2021)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Eldar Veremchuk

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitting article, which will be published (print and online) in journal Journal for Foreign Languages by Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, Aškerčeva 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). Author’s name will be evident in the article in journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in hands of the publisher.
  2. Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
  3. Authors retain copyright and grant the publisher right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.