Effects of seed size and aging on field performance of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) under different irrigation treatments

Authors

  • Kazem GHASSEMI-GOLEZANI Department of Plant Eco-Physiology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
  • Afsaneh CHADORDOOZ-JEDDI Department of Plant Eco-Physiology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
  • Saeid ZEHTAB-SALMASI Department of Plant Eco-Physiology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14720/aas.2014.103.2.1

Keywords:

lens culinaris, lentils, crop yield, yields, seeds, seed size, seed characteristics, drought stress, irrigation, watering, aging

Abstract

A sub-sample of lentil (Lens culinaris ‘Kimia’) seeds was kept as bulk (S1) and another sample was separated to large (S2) and small (S3) seeds. A sub-sample of each size was kept as control or high vigor seed lot (A1) and the two other sub-samples were artificially aged for 2 and 4 days (A2 and A3, respectively). Field performance of these seeds was evaluated during 2011 and 2012. Yield components and grain yield of lentil decreased with decreasing water availability. The highest yield components (except 1000 grain weight) and grain yield per unit area were obtained by plants from large seeds. The superiority of plants from large seeds in grain yield was more evident under limited irrigations than under well watering. Seed aging resulted in poor stand establishment and consequently low grain yield per unit area. Plants from aged large seeds showed the lowest reduction in grain yield per unit area, compared with those from aged small and bulk seeds. It seems that cultivation of large seeds somehow can reduce the deleterious effects of drought stress and seed aging on grain yield per unit area of lentil.

References

Al-Karaki G.N. 1998. Seed size and water potential effects on water uptake, germination and growth of lentil. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 181, 237–242. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439- 037X.1998.tb00423.x

ASPB, 2003. Regulations on the sale of planting seed in Arkansas. Arkansas State Plant Board, Little Rock, Arkansas.

Bailly C., Benamar A., Corbineau F., Come D. 1998. Free radical scavenging as affected by accelerated ageing and subsequent priming in sunflower seeds. Plant Physiology, 104, 646–652. DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-3054.1998.1040418.x

Chartzoulakis K., Noitsakis B., Therios I. 1993. Photosynthesis, plant growth and dry matter distribution in kiwifruit as influenced by water deficits. Irrigation Science, 14, 1–5. DOI: 10.1007/BF00194999

Eriksson O. 1999. Seed size variation and its effect on germination and seedling performance in the clonal herb Convallaria majalis. Acta Oecologiaca, 20, 61–66. DOI: 10.1016/S1146-609X(99)80016-2

Fujikura Y., Karssen C.M. 1995. Molecular studies on osmoprimed seeds of cauliflower: a partial amino acid sequence of a vigour -related protein and osmopriming-enhanced expression of putative aspartic protease. Seed Science and Research, 5, 177–181. DOI: 10.1017/S0960258500002804

Fulai L., Christian R., Jensena M., Andersenb N. 2004. Drought stress effect on carbohydrate concentration in soybean leaves and pods during early reproductive stages: its implication in altering pod set. Field Crops and Research, 86, 1–13. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4290(03)00165-5

Ghassemi-Golezani K., Dalil B., Moghaddam M., Raey Y. 2011. Field performance of differentially deteriorated seed lots of maize (Zea mays ) under different irrigation treat ments. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 39, 160–163.

Ghassemi-Golezani K., Hosseinzadeh-Mahootchy A., Zehtab-Salmasi S., Tourchi M. 2012. Improving field performance of aged chickpea seeds by hydro- priming under water stress. International Journal of Plant Animal Environmental Sciences, 2, 168–176.

Ghassemi-Golezani K., Khomari S., Dalil B., Hosseinzadeh-Mahootchy A., Chadordooz-Jeddi A. 2010. Effects of seed aging on field performance of winter oil-seed rape. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment, 8, 175–178.

Ghassemi-Golezani K., Gh anehpoor S., Dabbagh Mohammadi-Nasab A. 2009. Effects of water limitation on growth and grain filling of faba bean cultivars. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment, 7, 442–447.

Hsu J.L., Sung J.M. 1997. Antioxidant role of glutathione associated w ith accelerated aging and hydration of triploid watermelon seeds. Plant Physiology, 100, 967–974. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399- 3054.1997.tb00024.x

Hu Y., Schmidhalter U. 1998. Spatial distributions of inorganic ions and carbohy drates contributing to osmotic adjustment in the elongating wheat leaf under saline conditions. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 25, 591–597. DOI: 10.1071/PP97162

International Seed Testing Association (ISTA). 2010. International rules for seed testing, Seed vigor testing. Chapter 15: 1–57.

Kamel A., Loser D.M. 1995. Contribution of carbohydrates and other solutes to osmotic adjustment in wheat leaves under water stress. Journal of Plant Physiology, 145, 363–366. DOI: 10.1016/S0176-1617(11)81903-6

Kim S.H., Bin Y.H., Choe Z.R. 1989. The use of multiple seed vigor indices to predict field emergence and grain yield of naked and malting barley. Journal of Crop Science, 34, 134–141.

Kim J.Y., Mahe A., Brangeon J., Prioul J.L. 2000. A maize vacuolar invertase, IVR2, is induced by water stress. Organ/tissue specificity and diurnal modulation of expression. Plant Physiology, 124, 71–84. DOI: 10.1104/pp.124.1.71

Krannitz P.G., Aarssen L.W., Dow J.M. 1999. The effect of genetically base d differences in seed size on seedling survival in Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae). American Journal of Botany, 78, 446–450. DOI: 10.2307/2444967

Kriedemann P.E., Barrs H.D. 1981. Citrus orchards . In: Water Deficit and Plant Growth. Kozlowski T.T, (ed.). New York, Academic Press: 325–417.

Leishman M.R., Westoby M. 1994. The role of large seed size in shaded conditions: experimental evidence. Functional Ecology, 8, 205–214. DOI: 10.2307/2389903

Lloret F.C., Casanovas C., Pen ̃ uelas J. 1999. Seedling survival of Mediterranean shrubland species in relation to root: shoot ration, seed size and water and nitrogen use. Functional Ecology, 13, 210–216. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00309.x

Manga V.K., Yadav O.P. 1995. Effect of seed size on developmental traits adaptability to tolerate drought in pearl millet. Journal of Arid Environments, 29, 169–172. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-1963(05)80087-4

McDonald M.B. 1999. Seed deterioration: physiology, repair and assessment. Seed Science and Technology, 27, 177–237.

Moles A.T., Westoby M. 2004. What do seedlings die from and what are the implications for evolution of seed size? Oikos, 106, 193–199. DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.13101.x

Osborne D.J. 1983. Biochemical control systems operating in the early hours of germination. Canadian Journal of Botany, 61, 3568–3577. DOI: 10.1139/b83-406

Osunkoja O.O., Ash J.E., Hopkins M.S., Graham A.W. 1994. Influence of seed size and seedling ecological attributes on shade-tolerance of rain-forest tree species in northern Qu eensland. Journal of Ecology, 82, 149–163. DOI: 10.2307/2261394

Pereira J.S., Chaves M.M. 1995. Plant responses to drought under climate change in mediterranean- type ecosystems. In: Global Change and Mediterranean-type Ecosytems. Moreno J.M., Oechel W.C. (eds.). Ecological studies, New York, Springer-Verlag: 140–160.

Rao S.K. 1981. Influence of seed size on field germination, seedling vigor, yield and quality of self-pollinated crops: a review. Agricultural Review, 2, 95–101.

Royo C., Ramdani A., Moragues M., Villegas D. 2006. Durum wheat bunder Mediterranean conditions as affected by seed size. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 192, 257–266. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439- 037X.2006.00215.x

Saha R.R., Sultana W. 2008. Influence of seed ageing on growth and yield of soybean. Bangladesh Journal of Botany, 37, 21–26. DOI: 10.3329/bjb.v37i1.1559

Schimpf D.J. 1977. Seed weight of Amaranthus retroflexus in relation to moisture and lengthof growing season. Ecology, 58, 450–453. DOI: 10.2307/1935621

Seiwa K. 2000. Effects of seed size and emergence time on tree seedling establishment importance of developmental constraints. Oecologia, 123, 208– 215. DOI: 10.1007/s004420051007

Szilagyi L. 2003. Influence of drought on seed yield components in common bean, Blug. Journal of Plant Physiology Speci al, Issue, 320–330.

D.M., Egli D.B. 1991. Relationship of seed vigor to crop yield: A Review. Crop Science, 31, 816–822.

Trawatha S.E., Tekrony D.M., Hidebrand D.F. 1995. Relationship of soybean seed quality to fatty acid and C6–Aldehyde levels during storage. Crop Science, 35, 1415–22. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1995.0011183X003500050026x

Vaughton G., Ramsey M. 1998. Sources and consequences of seed mass variation in Banksia marginata (Proteaceae). Journal of Ecology, 86, 563–573. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.1998.00279.x

Vieira R.D., Paiva-Aguero J.A., Perecin D., Bittencourt S. 1999. Correlation of electrical conductivity and other vigor tests with field emergence of soybean seedlings. Seed Science and Technology, 27, 67– 75.

Wulff R.D., Causin H.F., Benitez O., Bacalini P.A. 1999. Intraespecific variability and maternal effects in the response to nutrient addition in Chenopodium album. Canadian Journal of Botany, 77, 1150– 1158. DOI: 10.1139/b99-124

Downloads

Published

4. 12. 2015

Issue

Section

Agronomy section

How to Cite

GHASSEMI-GOLEZANI, K., CHADORDOOZ-JEDDI, A., & ZEHTAB-SALMASI, S. (2015). Effects of seed size and aging on field performance of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) under different irrigation treatments. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica, 103(2), 158–166. https://doi.org/10.14720/aas.2014.103.2.1

Similar Articles

1-10 of 714

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.