POSSIBILITIES OF ENVIRONMENTALLY ACCEPTABLE CONTROL METHODS AGAINST ECONOMICALLY IMPORTANT SLUGS WITH EMPHASIS ON THE RESULTS OF DOMESTIC RESEARCHES OF CONTROLLING ARIONIDAE SLUGS

Authors

  • Žiga Laznik University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Slovenia
  • Stanislav Trdan University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Slovenia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14720/aas.2016.107.2.23

Keywords:

slugs, control, environmentally acceptable methods

Abstract

Slugs from the Arionidae and Limacidae families are classified as an important economic agricultural pests. They are omnivorous animals. Slugs are sensitive to drying out, so they are active at night and in cloudy, rainy weather. They cause economic damage to the vegetables, crops, fruit trees, shrubs, grasses, herbs and ornamental plants. First reports of slugs control are dating from the early 20th century. This was followed by an important discovery in the year 1934 when in South Africa metaldehyde was discovered. This discovery has brought significant progress in the protection of plants against slugs. The next major step in the development of molluscicides was achieved with the discovery of carbamates. Due to the proven non-target effect of metaldehyde and other substances with molluscicidal activity researchers are looking for alternative solutions in the protection of plants against slugs. In this paper we present a variety of environmentally acceptable methods of slugs control, such as proper soil cultivation, beer trapping, barriers and the use of so-called electrical fences against slugs.

References

Ahmadi E. 2004. A faunal study on snails and slugs on canola as a second cropping in pady fields in Guilan and Mazandaran provinces. J Agric Sci, 1: 69-82 [In Persian].

Burnie D. 2001. Ilustrirana enciklopedija živali. Učila, založba, d.o.o., Tržič: 20 str.

Dmitrieva E.F. 1978. The influence of temperature and moisture of the upper soil layer on the hatching intensity of the slug Deroceras reticulatum Müller. Malacolog Rev, 11: 81-82.

Esenko I. 2008. Sto vrtnih živali na Slovenskem, 1. Izdaja. Prešernova družba d.d., Ljubljana: 244 str.

Frank T. 1998. Slug damage and numbers of the slug pests, Arion lusitanicus and Deroceras reticulatum, in oilseed rape grown beside sown wildflower strips. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 67: 67-78. Doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(97)00108-4

Godin D. 1983. Pest slugs and snails. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 172 str. Doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-68797-6

Hammond R.B., Beck T., Smith J.A., Amos R., Barker J., Moore R., Siegrist H., Slates D., Ward B. 1999. Slugs in conservation tillage corn and soybeans in the Eastern corn belt. J Entomol Sci, 4: 467-478.

Hata T.Y., Hara A.H., Hu B.K.S. 1997. Molluscicides and mechanical barriers against slugs Vaginula plebeia Fischer and Veronicella cubensis (Pfeiffer) (Stylommatophora:Veronicellidae). Crop Prot, 16: 501-506. Doi: 10.1016/S0261-2194(97)00034-3

Henderson I., Triebskorn R. 2002. Chemical control of terrestrial gastropods. V: Molluscs as crop pests (Ur. G.M. Barker). CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK: 1-31. Doi: 10.1079/9780851993201.0001

Kozłowski J. 2000. Reproduction of Arion lusitanicus Mabille, 1868 (Gastropoda: Pulmonata: Arionidae) introduced in Poland. J Plant Prot Res, 8: 87–94.

Kozłowski J., Kozłowska M. 1998. Food preferences of the slug Arion lusitanicus Mabille (Gastropoda: Stylommatophora) in south-east part in Poland. J Plant Prot Res, 38: 81–83.

Kozłowski J., Sionek R. 2000. The rate of egg laying and hatching of the slug Arion lusitanicus Mabille, a pest of arable crops. J Plant Prot Res, 40: 162-167.

Laznik Ž., Trdan S. 2009. Parazitske ogorčice polžev. Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 93: 87-92.

Laznik Ž., Križaj D., Trdan S. 2011. The effectiveness of electrified fencing using copper electrodes for slug (Arion spp.) control with direct electric current and voltage. Span J Agric Res, 9: 894-900. Doi: 10.5424/sjar/20110903-412-10

Martin T.J. 1993. The ecobiological effects of arable cropping including the non-target effects of pesticides with special reference to methiocarb pellets (Draza, Mesurol) used for slug control. Pflanzenschutz-Nachr Bayer, 46: 49-102.

Mihičinac, M. 2010. Laboratorijsko preučevanje učinkovitosti različnih snovi za zatiranje lazarjev (Arion spp., Gastropoda, Arionidae). Dipl. delo, Biotehniška fakulteta, Ljubljana: 36 str.

Milevoj L. 2007. Kmetijska entomologija (splošni del). Ljubljana, Biotehniška fakulteta Univerze v Ljubljani: 182 str.

Ortan M. 2014. Zatiranje polžev. Kmetovalec, 6-7: 34.

Prior D.J. 1985. Water regulatory behaviour in terrestrial gastropods. Biol Rev, 60: 403-425. Doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1985.tb00423.x

Purvis G. 1996. The hazard posed by methiocarb slug pellets to carabid beetles: understanding population effects in the field. V: Slug and snail pests in agriculture (Henderson I.F., ur). BCPC Monograph No. 66, British Crop Production Council: 189-196.

Resnik, S. 2015. Preučevanje kontaktnega delovanja izbranih okoljsko sprejemljivih snovi na lazarje (Arion spp., Gastropoda, Arionidae) v laboratorijskem poskusu. Dipl. delo., Biotehniška fakulteta, Ljubljana: 40 str.

Ryder T.A., Bowen I.D. 1977. The slug foot as a site of uptake of copper molluscicide. J Invertebr Pathol, 30: 381-386. Doi: 10.1016/0022-2011(77)90149-5

Schüder I., Port G., Bennison J. 2003. Barriers, repellents and antifeedants for slug and snail control. Crop Prot, 22: 1033-1038. Doi: 10.1016/S0261-2194(03)00120-0

Šušek A. 2015. Zelena pomlad. Moj mali svet, 3-4: 25.

Vakselj N. 1992. Škodljive vrste polžev (Gastropoda) in njihovo zatiranje. Diplomska naloga. Ljubljana, BF, Oddelek za agronomijo: 35 str.

Verlič, D. 2012. Laboratorijsko preučevanje limacidnega delovanja izbranih snovi na lazarje (Arion spp., Gastropoda, Arionidae). Dipl. delo, Biotehniška fakulteta, Ljubljana: 28 str.

Wilson M.J., Glen D.M., George S.K., Butler R.C. 1993. The rhabditid nematode Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita, as a potential biocontrol agent for slugs. Biocontrol Sci Technol, 3: 503-511. Doi: 10.1080/09583159309355306

Young A.G., Port G.R. 1989. The effect of microclimate on slug activity in the field. I. Henderson (Ed.) British Crop Protection Council Monograph No. 41, Slugs and snails in world agriculture: 263-269.

Published

26. 10. 2016

Issue

Section

Agronomy section

How to Cite

Laznik, Žiga, & Trdan, S. (2016). POSSIBILITIES OF ENVIRONMENTALLY ACCEPTABLE CONTROL METHODS AGAINST ECONOMICALLY IMPORTANT SLUGS WITH EMPHASIS ON THE RESULTS OF DOMESTIC RESEARCHES OF CONTROLLING ARIONIDAE SLUGS. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica, 107(2), 531-536. https://doi.org/10.14720/aas.2016.107.2.23

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >>