Effect of different litter materials on foot pad dermatitis, hock burn and feather coverage in broiler chickens

Authors

  • Dušan TERČIČ Univ. of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Fac., Dept. of Animal Science, Groblje 3, SI-1230 Domžale, Slovenia
  • Mirjana ŽOLGER Šmartno pri Slovenj Gradcu 154, SI-2383 Šmartno, Slovenia
  • Mojca PESTOTNIK Univ. of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Fac., Dept. of Animal Science, Groblje 3, SI-1230 Domžale, Slovenia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14720/aas.2015.106.2.5

Keywords:

poultry, broiler chickens, litter, foot pad dermatitis, hock burn, feather coverage

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to evaluate the feather coverage on breast and thighs in meat type chickens, reared on three different types of litter materials, including wood shavings, shredded paper and chopped wheat straw. The experiment lasted for 72 days. A total of 447 one-day-old meat type chickens were randomly allotted to the three litter materials, giving 149 birds per litter. On days 24, 47 and 72 of the experimental period, feathering on the breast and thighs was scored according to a 1–4 scale. In addition, the severity of foot pad dermatitis (FPD) and hock burn (HB) was evaluated at the same days by attributing scores from 1−3. Litter characteristics (moisture content, water absorbing capacity, bulk density, pH) were determined at the end of the experiment. Severity of FPD varied significantly (P < 0.016) among the litter materials with chopped straw showing the highest severity scores and wood shavings showing the lowest. Litter material had no effect (P > 0.016) on the severity of HB and on thigh feathering. Birds reared on chopped wheat straw presented the lowest breast feather coverage. Straw litter had the highest moisture content and pH value. In conclusion, wood shavings proved to be best litter material for meat type chickens rearing among the three tested litter materials.

References

Cengiz Ö., Hess J.B., Bilgili S.F. 2011. Effect of bedding type and transient wetness on footpad dermatitis in broiler chickens. J. Appl. Poult. Res., 20: 554–560. doi:10.3382/japr.2011-00368

Garcia R.G., Almeida Paz I.C.L., Caldara F.R., Nääs I.A., Bueno L.G.F., Freitas L.W., Graciano J.D., Sim S. 2012. Litter materials and the incidence of carcass lesions in broilers chickens. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Avic., 14: 27–32

Greene J.A., McCracken R.M., Evans R.T. 1985. A contact dermatitis of broilers - clinical and pathological findings. Avian Pathol., 14: 23–38. doi:10.1080/03079458508436205

Haslam S.M., Knowles T.G., Brown S.N., Wilkins L.J., Kestin S.C., Warriss P.D., Nicol C.J. 2007. Factors affecting the prevalence of foot pad dermatitis, hock burn and breast burn in broiler chicken. Br. Poult. Sci., 48: 264–275. doi:10.1080/00071660701371341

Meluzzi A., Sirri F. 2009. Welfare of broiler chickens. Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 8, Suppl. 1: 161–173. doi:10.4081/ijas.2009.s1.161

SAS INSTITUTE INC. 2008. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 9.02. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA

Su G., Sorensen P., Kestin S.C. 2000. A note on the effects of perches and litter substrate on leg weakness in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci., 79: 1259–1263. doi:10.1093/ps/79.9.1259

Oliveira M.C., Ferreira H.A., Cancherini L.C. 2004. Efeito de condicionadores químicos sobre a qualidade da cama de frango. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zoo., 56: 536–541. doi:10.1590/S0102-09352004000400016

Tucker S.A., Walker A.W. 1992. Hock burn in broilers. In: Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition. Garnsworthy P.C., Haresign W., Cole J.D.A. (eds.). Oxford, Butterworth Heinemann: 33−49. doi:10.1016/B978-0-7506-0714-8.50006-0

Downloads

Published

28. 12. 2015

Issue

Section

Animal Science section

How to Cite

TERČIČ, D., ŽOLGER, M., & PESTOTNIK, M. (2015). Effect of different litter materials on foot pad dermatitis, hock burn and feather coverage in broiler chickens. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica, 106(2), 97–101. https://doi.org/10.14720/aas.2015.106.2.5

Similar Articles

11-20 of 69

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.