Improvement of yield and yield stability in safflower using multivariate, parametric and non-parametric methods under different irrigation treatments and planting date

Pooran GOLKAR; Nasrin RAHMATABADI; Seyyed Ali Mohammad MIRMOHAMMADY MAIBODY

doi:10.14720/aas.2020.115.2.1257

Authors

Pooran GOLKAR Department of Natural Resources, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 8415683111, Iran
Nasrin RAHMATABADI Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156-83111, Iran.
Seyyed Ali Mohammad MIRMOHAMMADY MAIBODY Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156-83111, Iran.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14720/aas.2020.115.2.1257

Keywords:

safflower, parametric and non-parametric measures, yield, rank correlation

Abstract

Development of superior genotypes with high adaptability to different environments is considered as one of the most important goals in safflower breeding programs. In this study, ten parametric and six non-parametric measures along with the additive main effects and the relevant multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model were used to evaluate genotype by environment interaction (GE) in 15 safflower genotypes across 12 test environments ) combination of year, planting date and moisture conditions) during growing seasons in 2016 and 2017. AMMI analysis revealed significant differences among the genotypes and their GE interactions. The different stability statistics were substantiated by rank correlation coefficient. Rank-correlation coefficients revealed positive and significant correlations between mean seed yield and superiority index (r = 0.99**), and significant and negative correlation with bi, R2, Dij and non- parametric measures (NPi(2), NPi(3) and NPi(4)). Based on most stability parameters, the Mex.295 genotype (G10) was found to be the most stable for seed yield. IL.111 genotype (G9) recorded the highest mean yielding genotype regarded as the most favorable safflower genotype. In conclusion, both stability and seed yield should be simultaneously considered to exploit useful effects of G × E interactions in safflower breeding programs.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdulahi, A., Pourdad, S.S. & Mohammadi, R. (2009). Stability analysis of seed yield in safflower genotypes in Iran. Acta Agronomica Hungarica, 57(2), 185-195. https://doi.org/10.1556/AAgr.57.2009.2.10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/AAgr.57.2009.2.10

Annicchiarico, P. (2002). Defining adaptation strategies and yield-stability targets in breeding programmes. In: Kang MS (ed) Quantitative genetics, genomics, and plant breeding. CABI, Wallingford, pp. 365-383. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851996011.0365 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851996011.0365

Becker, H.C. & Leon, J. (1988). Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breeding, 101, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.1988.tb00261.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.1988.tb00261.x

Caliskan, S. & Caliskan, M.E. (2018). Row and plant spacing effects on the yield and yield components of safflower in a mediterranean-type environment. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 23(2), 85-92. https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.467442 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.467442

Clarke, T.C., Parkin, G.W. & Ferre, T.P.A. (2008). Soil water content. In: Carter MR, Gregorich EG (eds) Soil sampling and methods of analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL: Canadian Society of Soil Science, pp. 939-961.

Dajue, L.& Mundel, H.H. (1996). Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Promoting the Conservation and Use of Underutilized and Neglected Crops 7. Gatersleben; Rome: Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research; International Plant Genetic Resources Institute.

Dehghani, M.R., Majidi, M.M., Mirlohi, A. & Saeidi, G.H. (2016). Integrating parametric and non-parametric measures to investigate genotype× environment interactions in tall fescue. Euphytica, 208(3), 583-596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-015-1611-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-015-1611-0

Ebdon, J.S. & Gauch, H.G.Jr. (2002). Additive main effect and multiplicative interaction analysis of national turfgrass performance trials: I. Interpretation of genotype × environment interaction. Crop Science, 42, 489- 496. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.4890 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.4890

Eberhart, S.A.T. & Russell, W.A. (1966). Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Science, 6, 36-40. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183X000600010011x DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183X000600010011x

Ebrahimi, F., Majidi, M.M., Arzani, A. & Mohammadi-Nejad, G. (2016). Oil and seed yield stability in a worldwide collection of safflower under arid environments of Iran. Euphytica, 212(1), 131-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-016-1779-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-016-1779-y

Farshadfar, E., Sabaghpour, S.H. & Zali, H, (2012). Comparison of parametric and non-parametric stability statistics for selecting stable chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes under diverse environments. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 6(3), 514.

Farooq, M., Hussain, M., Wahid, A. & Siddique, K.H.M. (2012). Drought stress in plants: an overview. In: Plant responses to drought stress (pp. 1-33). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32653-0_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32653-0_1

Francis, T.R. & Kannenberg, L.W. (1978). Yield stability studied in short-season maize. I. A descriptive method for grouping genotypes. Canadian Journal of Plant Sciences, 58, 1029-1034. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps78-157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps78-157

Gauch, H.G. & Zobel, R.W. (1996). AMMI analyses of yield trials. In: Genotype by Environment Interaction. Kang M. S. and Gauch H. G. (eds.). CRC. Boca Raton, Florida, pp. 85-122. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420049374.ch4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420049374.ch4

Gauch, H.G (2006). Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE. Crop Science, 46, 1488-1500. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.07-0193 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.07-0193

Golkar, P. (2014). Breeding improvements in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.): A review. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 8(7), 1079-1085.

Huehn, M. (1996). Nonparametric analysis of genotype x environment interactions by ranks. Genotype by Environ Interact CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420049374.ch9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420049374.ch9

Hussain, M.I., Lyra, D.A., Farooq, M., Nikoloudakis & N., Khalid, N. (2016). Salt and drought stresses in safflower: a review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 36(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0344-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0344-8

Moghaddam, M.J. & Pourdad, S.S. (2009). Comparison of parametric and non-parametric methods for analysing genotype× environment interactions in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 147(5), 601-612. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859609990050 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859609990050

Kar, G., Kumar, A., Martha, M. (2007). Water use efficiency and crop coefficients of dry season oilseed crops. Agricultural Water Management, 87(1), 73-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2006.06.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2006.06.002

Khalili, M. & Pour-Aboughadareh, A. (2016). Parametric and nonparametric measures for evaluating yield stability and adaptability in barley doubled haploid lines. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 18, 789-803.

Knowles, P.F. (1969). Centers of plant diversity and conservation of crop germplasm: safflower. Economic Botany, 23, 324-329. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860678 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860678

Kruskal, W.H. & Wallis, W.A. (1952). Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of American Statistical Association, 47(260), 583-621. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441

Kumar, S., Ambreen, H., Variath, M.T., Rao, A.R., Agarwal, M., Kumar, …, Jagannath, A. (2016). Utilization of molecular, phenotypic, and geographical diversity to develop compact composite core collection in the oilseed crop, safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) through maximization strategy. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 1554. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01554 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01554

Lin, C.S. & Binns, M.R. (1988). A method of analyzing cultivar × location × year experiments: A new stability parameter. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 76, 425-430. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00265344 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00265344

Mohammadi, R., Abdulahi, A., Haghparast, R., Armion, M. (2007). Interpreting genotype× environment interactions for durum wheat grain yields using nonparametric methods. Euphytica, 157(1-2), 239-251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9417-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9417-3

Mohebodini, M., Dehghani & H. Sabaghpour, S.H. (2006). Stability of performance in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik) genotypes in Iran. Euphytica, 149(3), 343-352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-006-9086-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-006-9086-7

Nassar, R. & Huehn, M. (1987). Studies on estimation of phenotypic stability: Tests of significance for nonparametric measures of phenotypic stability. Biometrics, 43, 45-53. https://doi.org/10.2307/2531947 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2531947

Omidi Tabrizi, A.H. (2006). Stability and adaptability estimates of some safflower cultivars and lines in different environmental conditions. Agriculture and Science Technology, 8,141-151.

Pacheco, A., Vargas, M., Alvarado, G., Rodriguez, F., Crossa, J. & Burgueno, J. (2015). “GEA-R (Genotype x Environment Analysis with R for Windows) Version 4.1”, hdl: 11529/10203, CIMMYT Research Data & Software Repository Network, V16.

Perkins, J.M. & Jinks, J.L. (1968). Environmental and genotype environmental components of variability. Heredity, 23, 523- 535. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1968.71 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1968.71

Pinthus, J.M. (1973). Estimate of genotype value: A proposed method. Euphytica, 22, 21-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00021563 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00021563

Pourdad S.S. & Mohammadi, R. (2008). Use of stability parameters for comparing safflower genotypes in multi environment trials. Asian Journal of Plant Science, 7(1), 100-104. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2008.100.104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2008.100.104

Purchase, J.L., Hatting, H. & Van Deventer, C.S. (2000). Genotype × environment interaction of winter wheat in South Africa: II. stability analysis of yield performance. South African Journal of Plant and Soil, 17(3), 101-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/02571862.2000.10634878 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02571862.2000.10634878

Sabaghnia, N., Dehghani, H. & Sabaghpour, S.H. (2006). Nonparametric methods for interpreting genotype 9 environment interaction of lentil genotypes. Crop Science, 46, 1100-1106. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.06-0122 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.06-0122

Sayyah, S.S., Ghobadi, M., Mansoorifar, S. & Zebarjadi, A.R. (2015). The yield of wheat genotypes associated with yield components under irrigated and drought stress after anthesis. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 61(12), 1743-1755. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2014.1001751 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2014.1001751

Shukla, G.K. (1972). Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype-environmental components of variability. Heredity, 29, 237-245. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1972.87 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1972.87

Steel, R.G.D. & Torrie, J.H. (1980). Principles and procedures of statistics, a Biometrical Approach. 2nd edition. McGraw-Hill, New York, 633 pp.

Thennarasu, K. (1995). On certain non-parametric procedures for studying genotype-environment interactions and yield stability. Ph.D. Thesis. P. J. School, IARI, New Delhi.

Wricke, G. (1962). Uber eine Methode zur Erfassung der okologischen Streubreite in Feldversuchen. Zeitschrift Fur Pflanzenzuchtung-J. Plant Breeding, 47, 92-96.