CAP post 2022 scenarios and income impacts – a case analysis for selected typical farms in Slovenia

Authors

  • Jaka ŽGAJNAR University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Department for Animal Science, Slovenia
  • Luka JUVANČIČ University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Department for Animal Science, Slovenia
  • Stane KAVČIČ University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Department for Animal Science, Slovenia
  • Emil ERJAVEC University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Department for Animal Science, Slovenia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14720/aas.2021.117.2.2116

Keywords:

direct payments, CAP strategic plan, farm model, impact assessment

Abstract

Assessment based on representative farms is an established approach in the modern assessment of the effects of changes in agricultural policy. In line with previous CAP reforms, we can expect income redistribution impacts also with the implementation of the legislative and financial framework of the CAP for the next period. This paper discusses a scenario analysis using the farm model. The model is based on linear programming, which enables to address various technological challenges at farm level. We formed the scenarios for the analysis following the example of the scenarios contained in the impact assessment that the European Commission prepared for the CAP after 2020. The analysis involves selected farm types from selected sectors. The results suggest that the expected reduction in the envelope will generally lead to lower farm-level revenues from CAP direct payments. Consequently, economic performance will deteriorate, what is likely to be amplified in some sectors by the abolition of historical payments. The range of consequences at farm level will likely be considerable, especially for sectors and production types with a high share of CAP payments in the structure of total farm income. In certain sectors, however, there is even an improvement regarding the current situation.

References

AIS (2019). Model calculations. Internal electronic source. Agricultural Institute of Slovenia, Ljubljana. (Unpublished raw data).

Alons, G. (2019). The advantage of paradigmatic contestation in shaping and selling public policies. Journal of Public Policy, X, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X19000060

Coleman, W.D. (1998). From protected development to market liberalism. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(4), 632–651. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501769880000061

Daugbjerg, C., Swinbank, A. (2016). Three decades of policy layering and politically sustain-able reform in the European Union’s agricultural policy. Governance, 29(2), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12171

Erjavec, K., Erjavec, E. (2020). The noble or sour wine : European Commissionʼs competing discourses on the main CAP reforms. Sociologia ruralis: journal of the European society for rural sociology, 60(3), 661-679. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12300

European Commission. (2018a). Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing rules on support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States under the Common agricultural policy (CAP Strategic Plans) and financed by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Brussels. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52018PC0392&from=EN

European Commission. (2018b). Commission staff working document – Impact Assessment. Accompanying the legislative proposals on support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States under the Common agricultural policy (CAP Strategic Plans), on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products. Brussels. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/10102/2018/EN/SWD-2018-301-F1-EN-MAIN-PART-3.PDF

European Commission. (2020). Common agricultural policy indicators. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/info/food-farming-fisheries/farming/facts-and-figures/performance-agricultural-policy/cap-indicators_en

Hill, B. (2018). Farm Income. Wealth and Agricultural policy. 3rd ed. Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315201696

Kavčič, S., Erjavec, E. (2003) Ocena dohodkovnega položaja slovenskega kmetijstva po pristopu k Evropski uniji. In: Kavčič, Stane (ur.), Erjavec, Emil (ur.), Kuhar, Aleš (ur.). Slovensko kmetijstvo in Evropska unija. 1. izd. Ljubljana: Društvo agrarnih ekonomistov Slovenije – DAES. 37-52.

Langrell, S., Ciaian, P., Espinosa, M., Gomez Paloma, S., Heckelei, T., Louhichi, K., Sckokai, P., Thomas, A., Vard, T. (2013). Farm level modelling of CAP: a methodological overview. Joint Research Centre Scientific and Policy Reports. Luxenbourg: European Union.

Lee, N., Kirkpatrick, C. (2006). Evidence-based policy-making in Europe: an evaluation of European Commission integrated impact assessments. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 24(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154606781765327

Lovec, M., Šumrada, T., Erjavec, E. (2020). New CAP delivery model, old issues. Intereconomics, 55(2), 112-119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-020-0880-6

Matthews, A. (2020). When the CAP budget pendulum finally stopped swinging. CAP Reform blog. Available at http://capreform.eu/when-the-cap-budget-pendulum-finally-stopped-swinging/

Rednak, M., Erjavec, E., Volk, T., Kavčič, S. (2005). Distributivni učinki spremenjene politike neposrednih plačil na slovensko kmetijstvo. In: KAVČIČ, Stane (ur). Slovenija v EU – izzivi za kmetijstvo, živilstvo in podeželje. 3. konferenca DAES, Moravske Toplice, 10.-11. november 2005. 1. izd. Ljubljana: Društvo agrarnih ekonomistov Slovenije – DAES. 13-27.

Rednak, M., Erjavec, E., Volk, T., Zagorc, B., Moljk, B., Kavčič, S., Kožar, M., Turk, J., Rozman, Č., Vučko, I. (2009). Analysis of the effects of agricultural policy with the model of typical agricultural holding. Final report of the project V4-0361. Ljubljana: Agricultural Institute of Slovenia.

Reidsma, P., Janssen, S., Jansen, J., van Ittersum, M. K. (2018). On the development and use of farm models for policy impact assessment in the European Union – A review. Agricultural Systems, 159, 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.10.012

Salamon P., Banse M., Barreiro-hurlé J., Chaloupka O., Donnellan T., Erjavec E., Fellmann F., Hanrahan K., Hass M., Jongeneel R., Laquai V., vanLeeuwen M., Molnár A., Pechrová M., Salputra G., Baltussen W., Efken J., Hélaine S., Jungehülsing J., von Ledebur O., Rac I., Santini F. (2017). Unveiling diversity in agricultural markets projections: from EU to Member States. A medium-term outlook with the AGMEMOD model. JRC Technical Report, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.

Severini S., Tantari A. (2015). The distributional impact of agricultural policy tools on Italian farm household incomes. Journal of Policy Modeling, 37(1), 124–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2015.01.004

Sinabell, F., Schmid, E., Hofreither, M. F. (2013). Exploring the distribution of direct payments of the common agricultural policy. Empirica, 40(2), 325–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-012-9194-7

Šumrada, T., Lovec, M., Juvančič, L., Rac, I., Erjavec, E. (2020). Fit for the task? Integration of biodiversity policy into the post-2020 Common Agricultural Policy : illustration on the case of Slovenia. Journal for nature conservation, 54, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2020.125804

Van Tongeren, F., Van Meijl, H., Surry, Y. (2001). Global models applied to agricultural and trade policies: a review and assessment. Agricultural Economics, 26(2), 149–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2001.tb00060.x

Volk, T., Brečko, J., Erjavec, E., Jerič, D., Kavčič, S., Kožar, M., Moljk, B., Rednak, M., Zagorc, B., Žgajnar, J. (2017). Development of a comprehensive farm model and related databases to support decision-making in Slovenian agriculture (V4-1423). Final report V4-1423. Ljubljana: Agricultural Institute of Slovenia.

Žgajnar, J., Kavčič, S. (2016). Optimal allocation of production resources under uncertainty: application of the multicriteria approach. Zemědělská ekonomika, 62(12), 556–565. https://doi.org/10.17221/238/2015-AGRICECON

Downloads

Published

14. 07. 2021

Issue

Section

Original Scientific Article

How to Cite

ŽGAJNAR, J., JUVANČIČ, L., KAVČIČ, S., & ERJAVEC, E. (2021). CAP post 2022 scenarios and income impacts – a case analysis for selected typical farms in Slovenia. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica, 117(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.14720/aas.2021.117.2.2116

Similar Articles

1-10 of 528

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>