Mitochondrial DNA analysis of the the Yugoslavian Shepherd Dog – Sharplanina and its phylogenetic relationship within and between breeds

Rifat MORINA; Avni ROBAJ; Mentor SOPJANI

doi:10.14720/aas.2024.120.2.19117

Authors

Rifat MORINA University of Prizren “Ukshin Hoti”, Faculty of Education, Prizren, Republic of Kosovo
Avni ROBAJ University of Prishtina, Faculty of Agriculture and Veterinary, Pristina, Republic of Kosovo
Mentor SOPJANI University of Prishtina, Faculty of Medicine, Pristina, Republic of Kosovo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14720/aas.2024.120.2.19117

Keywords:

livestock guardian dogs, breeds, Sharplanina shepherd dog, genetics, phylogenetics, haplotype, mitochondrial DNA

Abstract

The Yugoslavian Shepherd Dog – Sharplanina belongs to the group of Molosser type dog breeds and is an autochthonous dog breed in southwestern Kosovo and northwestern North Macedonia. This breed is characterised by its genetic diversity in the mitochondrial DNA. In our research we found nine haplotypes grouped into three main clades A, B and C, with distribution rates of 43 %, 43 % and 14 %, respectively. Our analyses show that the “Sharplanina dog” exhibits a remarkable genetic heterogeneity, which makes it very difficult to determine its origin and to correlate the haplotypes with the geographical location of the collected samples. The geographical proximity of the breed’s origin to the habitat of the extinct ancient Molossian hound and the similarities of its haplotypes with certain dog breeds in Europe and East Asia make it a very interesting breed for further research.

References

Altunok, V., Koban, E., Chikhi, L., Schaffer, A., Pedersen, N. C., Nizamlioğlu, M. & Togan, İ. (2005). Genetic evidence for the distinctness of Kangal dogs. Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Pulawy, 49(2), 249–254.

Angleby, H., & Savolainen, P. (2005). Forensic informativity of domestic dog mtDNA control region sequences. Forensic science international, 154(2–3), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.09.132

Bandelt, H. J., Forster, P., & Rohl, A. (1999). Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Molecular biology and evolution, 16(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026036

Ceh, E., & Dovc, P. (2014). Population structure and genetic differentiation of livestock guard dog breeds from the Western Balkans. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics. 131(4), 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12077

Clement, M., Posada, D., & Crandall, K. A. (2000). TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Molecular ecology, 9(10), 1657–1659. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.01020.x

Gundry, R. L., Allard, M. W., Moretti, T. R., Honeycutt, R. L., Wilson, M. R., Monson, K. L. & Foran, D. R. (2007). Mitochondrial DNA analysis of the domestic dog: control region variation within and among breeds. Journal of forensic sciences, 52(3), 562–572. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00425.x

Leonard, J. A., Wayne, R. K., Wheeler, J., Valadez, R., Guillen, S., & Vila, C. (2002). Ancient DNA evidence for Old World origin of New World dogs. Science, 298(5598), 1613–1616. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1076980

Li, Y. X, Gao, Y. L, He, X. L, Cao, S. X. (2017). Exploration of mtDNA control region sequences in Chiniese Tibetan Mastiffs. Mitochondrial DNA PART A, 29(5), 800–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/24701394.2017.1357714

Okumura, N., Ishiguro, N., Nakano, M., Matsui, A., & Sahara, M. (1996). Intra- and interbreed genetic variations of mitochondrial DNA major non-coding regions in Japanese native dog breeds (Canis familiaris). Animal genetics, 27(6), 397–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.1996.tb00506.x

Pereira, L., Van Asch, B., & Amorim, A. (2004). Standardisation of nomenclature for dog mtDNA D-loop: a prerequisite for launching a Canis familiaris database. Forensic science international, 141(2–3), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2003.12.014

Savolainen, P., & Lundeberg, J. (1999). Forensic evidence based on mtDNA from dog and wolf hairs. Journal of forensic sciences, 44(1), 77–81. https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS14414J

Savolainen, P., Zhang, Y. P., Luo, J., Lundeberg, J., & Leitner, T. (2002). Genetic evidence for an east Asian origin of domestic dogs. Science, 298(5598), 1610–1613. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1073906

Schneider, S., Roessli, D. & Excoffier, L. 2000. Arlequin ver (2000): A software for population genetics data analysis. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva, Switzerland.

Sundqvist, A. K., Bjornerfeldt, S., Leonard, J. A., Hailer, F., Hedhammar, A., Ellegren, H., & Vila, C. (2006). Unequal contribution of sexes in the origin of dog breeds. Genetics, 172(2), 1121–1128. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.105.042358

Tamura, K., & Nei, M. (1993). Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Molecular biology and evolution, 10(3), 512–526.

Tsuda, K., Kikkawa, Y., Yonekawa, H., & Tanabe, Y. (1997). Extensive interbreeding occurred among multiple matriarchal ancestors during the domestication of dogs: evidence from inter- and intraspecies polymorphisms in the D-loop region of mitochondrial DNA between dogs and wolves. Genes and genetic systems, 72(4), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1266/ggs.72.229

Van Asch, B., Pereira, L., Pereira, F., Santa-Rita, P., Lima, M., & Amorim, A. (2005). MtDNA diversity among four Portuguese autochthonous dog breeds: a fine-scale characterisation. BioMed Central genetics, 6(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-6-37

Vila, C., Maldonado, J. E., & Wayne, R. K. (1999). Phylogenetic relationships, evolution, and genetic diversity of the domestic dog. The Journal of heredity, 90(1), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/90.1.71

Vila, C., Savolainen, P., Maldonado, J. E., Amorim, I. R., Rice, J. E., Honeycutt, R. L., ... Wayne R.K. (1997). Multiple and ancient origins of the domestic dog. Science, 276(5319), 1687–1689. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.276.5319.1687

Wayne, R. K., Ostrander E. A. (1999). Origin, genetic diversity, and genome structure of the domestic dog. Bioessays, 21(3), 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(199903)21:3%3C247::AID-BIES9%3E3.0.CO;2-Z

Webb, K, Allard, M. (2010). Assessment of minimum sample sizes required to adequately represent diversity reveals inadequacies in datasets of domestic dog mitochondrial DNA. Mitochondrial DNA, 21(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.3109/19401730903532044