Questions as a basis for comparison of biology textbooks and workbooks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14720/abs.48.2.13567Keywords:
textbooks, evaluation, Bloom’s taxonomy of the cognitive domainAbstract
This study focused on the analysis of three biology teaching sets and one textbook for 8 and 9 grade of elementary school. As a criterion we used thenumber and structure of questions assessable by Bloom’s taxonomy of the cognitive domain. It is obvious from the differences in the number and type of questions that the authors of the teaching materials differed in their understanding of the role of textbooks and workbooks in the teaching process. The analysed teaching sets included between 1.1 and 1.4 questions per page; most of them found in workbooks. The exception was one textbook with no questions for the students.The analysis of the questions using Bloom’s scale of cognitive levels showed statistically significant differences between teaching sets. The average cognitive level of the questions in a teaching set was between 1.7 and 2.1. The questions represent only one of indicators that show to what extent the didactic aspect was considered in the teaching sets, but the results suggest biology teaching material for elementary school is overly focused on lower cognitive levels, mostly recognition, not providing enough knowledge of higher cognitive levels.
References
ANDERSON O. R. & S. Botticelli 1990: Quantitative Analysis of Content Organization in Some Biology Texts Varying in Textual Composition. Science Education 74: 167-182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730740204
BYBEE R. W. 2001: Unintentional Consequences of an Unacceptable Evaluation. The American Biology Teacher 63: 2-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4451021
CHIAPPETTA E. L., G. H. SETHNA & D. A. FILLMAN 1993: Do Middle School Life Science Textbooks Provide a Balance of Scientific Literacy Themes? Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30: 787-797. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660300714
CONRAD S. M. 1996: Investigating Academic Texts with Corpus-based Techniques: An Example from Biology. Linguistic and Education 8: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898(96)90025-X
- 326.
DIMOPOULOS K., V. KOULAIDIS & S. SKLAVENITI 2003: Towards an Analysis of Visual Images in School Science Textbooks and Press Articles about Science and Technology. Research in Science Education 33: 189-216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025006310503
ELLIOT D. L. & K. NAGEL CARTER 1987: School Science and the Pursuit of Knowledge – Deadends and All. Science and Children 24: 9-12.
ELTINGE E. M. &. C.W. ROBERTS 1993: Linguistic Content Analysis: A Method to Measure Science as Inquiry in Textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30: 65-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660300106
GARINGER D. 2001: Textbook Evaluation. Retrieved July 14, 2005, from http://www.teflwebj.org/v1n1/garinger.html
HARRISON A. G. 2001. How do Teachers and Textbook Writers Model Scientific Ideas for Students? Research in Science Education 31: 401-435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013120312331
HOFF D. J. 2000. Science Group Bemoans Quality of Biology Textbooks. Education Week 19: 13.
KESIDOU S. & J. E. ROSEMAN 2002: How Well do Middle School Science Programs Measure up? Findings from Project 2061’s Curriculum Review. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39: 522-549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10035
KIRK M., C. E. MATTHEWS & S. KURTTS 2001: The Trouble with Textbooks. The Science Teacher 68: 42-45.
LLOYD C. V. 1990: The Elaboration of Concepts in Three Biology Textbooks: Facilitating Student Learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 27: 1019-1032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660271009
LOWERY L. F. & W. H. LEONARD 1978: A Comparison of Questioning Styles Among Four Widely Used High School Biology Textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 15: 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660150102
MARENTIČ PO`ŽARNIK B. 1992. Učbeniki so namenjeni učencem. In: @eljko A. (ed.): Učbeniki danes in jutri:
prispevki s srečanja avtorjev učbenikov DZS, DZS, Ljubljana, pp. 19-26.
NINNES P. 2000: Representation of Indigenous Knowledges in Secondary School Science Textbooks in Australia and Canada. International Journal of Science Education 22: 603-617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900289697
VERČKOVNIK T. & J. STRGAR 2003: Učbenik kot sredstvo za doseganje vzgojno-izobra`ževalnih ciljev programa. Evalvacijska študija. Ministrstvo za šolstvo, znanost in šport, Ljubljana, 81 pp.
TAMIR P. 1985: Content Analysis Focusing on Inquiry. Journal of Curriculum Studies 17: 87-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027850170107
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
