A biology teacher – a second career choice


  • Iztok Tomažič
  • Tatjana Vidic




student science teacher, teacher’s qualities, good biology teacher


For several years now, Slovenia has been facing a shortfall of interest in science studies. Some argue that the principal reason for this lies with inadequately trained science teachers in primary and secondary schools. We set out to find the reasons why double degree students of biology (Chemistry-Biology or Biology-Home Economics) at the Faculty of Education chose to become biology teachers, and outline certain guidelines for pedagogical work with students. The results of our survey show that the number of secondary school graduates whose first choice is either of the two biology teacher study programmes at the Faculty of Education is declining. Students who selected the programme as their second choice are mainly those who did not have enough credit points for their first options, i.e. medicine, dentistry, biochemistry, veterinary sciences or biology at the Biotechnical Faculty. Most of the students who decide to become biology teachers are female. The main motives are the students’ fondness for biology and the desire
to work with children. Students (regardless of which study programme they select) have fairly similar views on teaching biology. They believe that teachers should introduce practical work in the classroom, have good relationships with students, and are experts in their field (biology). Students in general did not provide innovative ideas about teaching methods which would not
be boring or uninteresting. Their ideas reflect their own experience of teachers, which is why it is important that they are included in work with pupils as early as possible. In this way they can gain their own direct experience of teaching, which helps them to build their own unique idea of what a biology teacher should be. Also highly qualified inservice teachers (mentors) should take part in education of future biology teachers. Inservice teachers could according to functioning of future teachers’ in the classroom propose to university teacher trainers what knowledge do those future teachers lack and should gain in a faculty setting. On the basis of this information introductory science courses could be better accommodated to the needs of future teachers.


Ausubel d. p., j. d. Novak & h. Hanesian 1978: Educational Psychology a cognitive view, 2nd ed. Holt, Reinehart and Winston Inc. USA, p. 498–515.

Ben-Peretz m. 2001: The Impossible Role of Teacher Educators in a Changing World. Journal of Teacher Education 52 (1): 48–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487101052001005

Cenčič m. 2000: Razlogi študentov za izbiro učiteljskega poklica. Vzgoja in izobraževanje 31 (5): 53–58.

Crawford b. a. 2000: Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37 (9): 916–937. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200011)37:9<916::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-2

Crawford b. a. 2007: Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 44 (4): 613–642. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20157

Dana t. m., l. m. Campbell & v. n. Lunetta 1997: Theoretical Bases for Reform of Science Teacher Education. Elementary School Journal 97 (4): 419–432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/461874

Demirbolat a. o. 2006: Education faculty students’ tendencies and beliefs about the teacher’s role in education: A case study in a Turkish University. Teaching and Teacher Education 22: 1068–1083. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.020

Draper j. 2001: Career Decision-making in Teaching: Does Classroom Work Satisfy Teachers? In: Ivanuš Grmek M. & M. Javornik Krečič 2005: Mnenja študentov o ustrezni izbiri študija. Didactica Slovenica 20 (2): 51–60.

Driessen g. 2007: The Feminization of Primary Education: Effects of Teachers’ Sex on Pupil Achievement, Attitudes and Behaviour. International Review of Education 53 (2): 183–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-007-9039-y

Haritos c. 2004: Understanding Teaching through the Minds of Teacher Candidates: A Curious Blend of Realism and Idealism. Teaching & Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies 20 (6): 637–654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.06.005

Ivanuš Grmek m. & m. Javornik Krečič 2005: Mnenja študentov o ustrezni izbiri študija. Didactica Slovenica 20 (2): 51–60.

Japelj b., n. Brečko, t. Kavčič, a. Kreuh, & a. Petrinjak 2005: Odnos srednješolcev do naravoslovja. CPZ International, Center za promocijo znanja d.o.o., Pedagoški inštitut, Ljubljana. Lederman l. m. 2008: Scientists and 21st century science education. Technology in Society 30: 397–400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2008.04.014

Morais a. m., i. p. Neves & m. Afonso 2005: Teacher Training Processes and Teachers' CompetenceA Sociological Study in the Primary School. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies 21 (4): 415–437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.01.010

National Research Council 2001: Educating teachers of science, mathematics, and technology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Parker-Katz m. & m. Bay 2008: Conceptualizing mentor knowledge: Learning from the insiders. Teaching and Teacher Education 24: 1259–1269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.05.006

Pollen 2008: http://www.pollen-europa.net/, 24-Nov-08.

Richardson p. w. & h. m. g Watt 2005: 'I've decided to become a teacher': Influences on career change. Teaching and Teacher Education 21 (5): 475–489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.007

Robinson m. & w. Mcmillan 2006: Who Teaches the Teachers? Identity, Discourse and Policy in Teacher Education. Teaching & Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies 22 (3): 327–336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.11.003

Rots i., e. Sabbe & a. Aelterman 2002: The Feminization and the Social Status of the Teaching Profession. Paper presented at the European Conference on Educational Research, Lisbon, September 11–14.

Smith e. 2008: Raising standards in American schools? Problems with improving teacher quality. Teaching and Teacher Education 24. 610–622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.09.013

Tsai c.-c. 2002: Nested epistemologies: science teachers’ beliefs of teaching, learning and science. International Journal of Science Education 24 (8): 771–783. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110049132

Van Driel j. h., d. Beijaard & n. Verloop 2001: Professional Development and Reform in Science Education: The Role of Teachers' Practical Knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38 (2): 137–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200102)38:2<137::AID-TEA1001>3.0.CO;2-U

Vilhar b. 2005: Somrak zdrave pameti v šolskih klopeh. Sobotna priloga, Delo, pp.12–13.

Vpis (Registration Office of the University of Ljubljana) 2008: http://www.vpis.uni-lj.si/, 24-Nov08.

Weld j. & l. Funk 2005: »I'm Not the Science Type«: Effect of an Inquiry Biology Content Course on Preservice Elementary Teachers' Intentions about Teaching Science. Journal of Science Teacher Education 16 (3): 189–204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-005-4860-2

White p., s. Gorard & b. h. See 2006: What are the problems with teacher supply? Teaching and Teacher Education 22 (3): 315–326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.11.002

Wylie c. 2000: Trends in feminization of the teaching profession in OECD countries 1980-95. New Zealand Council for Educational Research, Geneva; (http://www.ilo.org/public/english/dialogue/sector/papers/feminize/wp-151.htm).

Zupanc d., m. Vrtačnik & r. Zorec 2006: Zanimanje za naravoslovje na splošni maturi upada že deset let. Delo, p. 25.






Original Research Paper

How to Cite

Tomažič, I., & Vidic, T. (2009). A biology teacher – a second career choice. Acta Biologica Slovenica, 52(1), 49-59. https://doi.org/10.14720/abs.52.1.15180

Similar Articles

11-20 of 62

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.