Biology Teachers’ Conceptions about Nature and Environment - Two Fundamental Concepts of Education for Sustainable Development

Authors

  • Gregor Torkar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14720/abs.52.1.15181

Keywords:

environment, nature, biology teacher, concepts, Education for Sustainable Development

Abstract

Education for Sustainable development (ESD) is an important strategy in achieving environmental improvement. Educators, such us biology teachers, have an important role to play. This article explores biology teachers’ conceptions and ideas about nature and environment, two basic conceptions in ESD. The study involved 105 biology teachers working in primary schools in Slovenia. The participating biology teachers completed a word association questionnaire. The analyses of the data show that the dominant conception of biology teachers concerning nature is biophysical. Nature is seen as non-human environment used by humans only as place of sport, recreation, beauty, quietness and rest. Dominant dimensions of environment are biophysical dimension, dimension of destruction and technostructure dimension. Environment is seen as place more dominated by human activities, infrastructure and consequences of pollution and degradation. Some similarities in teachers’ conception of nature and environment indicate conceptual confusion. Some teachers obviously think that the concept of environment is identical with that of nature.

References

Ali I. 2002. Kenyan children’s ideas about parks and wildlife. Environmental Education Research 8, 4: 439–462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1350462022000026827

Agelidou E., G. Balafoutas & E. Flogaitis 2000: Schematisation of concepts: a teaching strategy for environmental education, implementation in a water module third grade students in junior high school. Environmental Education Research 6, 3: 223–243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/713664682

Bela knjiga o vzgoji in izobraževanju v Republiki Sloveniji. 1995. Krek J.(ur.). Ljubljana, Ministrstvo za šolstvo in šport.

Braund M. 1991: Children’s ideas in classifaying animals. Journal of biological education 25, 2: 103–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1991.9655186

Flogaitis E. & E. Agelidou 2003: Kindergarten teacher’s conceptions about nature and the environment. Environmental Education Research 9, 4: 462–478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1350462032000126113

Kahn P. H. 2001: The Human relationship with nature: development and culture. Massachusetts, Institute of Technology. Kaplan S. 1995: Review of S.R. Kellert and E. O. Wilson, The biophilia hypothesis. Environment and Behaviour 27: 801–804.

Khalid T. 2003: Pre-service high school teachers’ perceptions of three environmental phenomena. Environmental Education Research 9, 1: 35–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620303466

Krnel D. 2005: Razumevanje besed, pojmov, procesov in problemov pri okoljski vzgoji. Okoljska vzgoja v šoli 7, 1: 41–42.

Krömker D. 2004: Naturbilder, klimaschutz und Kultur. Weinheim, Basel, Berlin, Beltz, Verlag. Loughland T., A. Reid & P. Petocz 2000: Young people’s conceptions of environment: a phenomenographic analysis. Environmental Education Research 8, 2: 187–197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220128248

Mausner C. 1996: A kaleidoscope model: Defining natural environments. Journal of environmental psychology 16: 335–348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1996.0028

MacDonald G.J. 2003: Environment: Evolution of a Concept. Journal of Environment & Development 12, 2: 151–176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496503012002002

Munson H.B. 1994: Ecological misconceptions. Journal of Environmental Education 25, 4: 30–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1994.9941962

Palmer J. 1994: Acquisition of environmental knowledge in pre-school children: an international study. Children’s Environments 11, 3: 204–211.

Palmer J. & P.Neal 1994. The handbook of environmental education. London, New York, Routledge. Prokop M., M. Kubiatko & J. Fančovičova 2007: Why do cocks crow? Children’s concepts about birds. Research in Science Education 37, 393–405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9031-8

Sato M. & P. James 1999: »Nature« and »environment« as perceived by university students and their supervisors, International Journal of Environmental Education and Information 18, 2: 165–172.

Sagadin J. 1993. Kvalitativna analiza podatkov pri študiji primera. Sodobna pedagogika, 44, 3/4: 115–123.

Shepardson D.P. 1997: Bugs, butterflys and spiders: children’s understanding about insects. International Journal of Science Education 24, 6: 627–643. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110074765

Summers M., C. Kruger, A. Childs & J. Mant 2000: Primary school teachers’ understanding of environmental issues: an interview study. Environmental Education Research 6,4: 293–312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/713664700

Tekkaya C. 2003: Remediating high school students’ misconceptions concerning difusion and osmosis through concept mapping and conceptual change text. Reseach in Science and Technologiacl Education 21, 1: 5–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140308340

Torkar G. & B. Bajd 2006: Trainee teacher’s ideas about endengered birds. Journal of Biological Education 41, 1: 1–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2006.9656049

UN Dacade of Education for Sustainable Development (2005–2014). http://www.unesco.org/education/desd (3.4.2006). World Conference on Education for All, 1992. WCEFA, Jomtien, Thailand, 5–9 March 1990: catalogue of documents. Paris, Unesco.

Downloads

Published

01.07.2009

Issue

Section

Original Research Paper

How to Cite

Torkar, G. (2009). Biology Teachers’ Conceptions about Nature and Environment - Two Fundamental Concepts of Education for Sustainable Development. Acta Biologica Slovenica, 52(1), 61-68. https://doi.org/10.14720/abs.52.1.15181

Similar Articles

1-10 of 100

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.