The structure of fish community in the river Mirna

Authors

  • Jasmina Jakopin
  • Mihael Jožef Toman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14720/abs.55.2.15534

Keywords:

running waters, loading, anthropogenic pressure, fish community, fish biodiversity

Abstract

Natural perturbations and human pressure increasingly affect the river ecosystems and their biological communities. Fish species are a good indicator of the river status and one of the factors for the assessment of ecological condition by the Water Framework Directive (Directive 2000/60/EC). River Mirna, one of the larger right tributaries of the river Sava, is a good example of anthropogenic pressure on the running water ecosystem. Fish community species structure was analyzed at selected eight sampling sites located over the 28 km length of the river. Abiotic conditions were determined by measuring the physical, chemical and hydro-morphological parameters and the influence of measured parameters on present fish community was analyzed. It has been determined, that the river Mirna is loaded with organic matter and physically changed by regulations, river beds canalizing and bank stabilization. Fish were sampled with standard electro-fishing method to determine species diversity, biomass of the specimens and their size. 29 fish species from seven families (26 native and 3 allochthonous species) were recorded along with one type of the Danubian brook lam- prey (Eudontomyzon vladykovi). Only two species, Telestes souffia and Cottus gobio, were present at all eight sampling sites. The largest number of specimens (890) and the largest biomass (5697 g) per 100 m2 was recorded at the sampling site located after the town as a result of the flow of purified water from the water treatment plant and a large number of invertebrates,which are an important food source. The minimum number of specimens per 100 m2 (86) and the minimum biomass of fish per 100 m2 (457 g) was measured at the relatively natural part of the channel. The most common causes for this are low temperatures, less food and a fast, turbulent flow. The study confirms that the changes in abiotic factors induced by anthropogenic activities significantly influence the structure of fish species community.

References

Cattanéo, F., Lamouroux, N., Breil, P., Capra, H., 2002. The influence of hydrological and biotic processes on brown trout (Salmo trutta) population dynamics. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 59, 1, 12–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/f01-186

CEN, 2003. Water quality – Sampling of fish with electricity, EN 14011.

Councile of the European Communities, 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities L327, 1–73.

Dauwalter, D. C., Splinter, D. K., Fusher, W. L., Marston, R. A., 2007. Geomorphology and stream habitat relationships with smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu) abundance at multiple spatial scales in eastern Oklahoma. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 64, 8, 1116–1129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/f07-085

Dekar, M. P., Magoulick, D. D., 2007. Factors affecting fish assemblage structure during seasonal stream drying. Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 16, 3, 335–342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0633.2006.00226.x

Feyrer, F., Healey, M. P., 2003. Fish community structure and environmental correlates in the highly altered southern Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 66, 123–132. Giller, P. S., Malmqvist, B., 1998. The biology of streams and rivers. Oxford, Oxford University DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023670404997

Press: 296 pp.

Grossman, G. D., Ratajezak, R. E., Crawford, Jr. M., Freeman, M. C., 1998. Assemblage Organiza- tion in Stream Fishes: Effects of enviromental Variation and Interspecific Interactions, Ecological Monographs, 68, 3, 395–420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9615(1998)068[0395:AOISFE]2.0.CO;2

Interaktivni Atlas okolja, 2006. Agencija Republike Slovenije za okolje http://gis.arso.gov.si/atlasokolja/profile.aspx?id=Atlas_Okolja_AXL@Arso

Jackson, D. A., Peres – Neto, P. R., Olden, J. D., 2001. What controls who is where in freshwater fish communities the roles of biotic, abiotic, and spatial factors. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 58, 1, 157–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/f00-239

Krebs C.J., 1999. Ecological methodology. 2nd ed., A. Wesley Longman, NY, USA. PAST (http://folk.uio.no/ohammer/past)

Pollux, B. J. A., Korosi, A., Verberk, W., Pollux, P., Velde, G., 2006. Reproduction, Growth and Mi- gration of Fishes in a regulated Lowland Tributary: Potencial Recruitment to the River Meuse. Hydrobiologia, 565, 1, 105–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-005-1908-4

Povž, M., Sket, B., 1990. Naše sladkovodne ribe. Ljubljana, Mladinska knjiga: 370 pp.

Tarman, K., 1992. Osnove ekologije in ekologija živali. Ljubljana, Državna založba Slovenije, 547 pp.

Trontelj, P., 2005. Vretenčarji Slovenije: gradivo za vaje iz zoologije strunarjev. Ljubljana, Študentska založba, 95 pp.

Uradni list RS, 2002. Pravilnik o uvrstitvi ogroženih rastlinskih in živalskih vrst v rdeči seznam.

Uradni list RS, 82–24. 9. 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.COT.0000285569.69128.1

Urbanič, G., Toman, M. J., 2003. Varstvo celinskih voda. Ljubljana, Študentska založba, 94 pp.

Downloads

Published

01.12.2012

Issue

Section

Original Research Paper

How to Cite

Jakopin, J., & Toman, M. J. (2012). The structure of fish community in the river Mirna. Acta Biologica Slovenica, 55(2), 39-48. https://doi.org/10.14720/abs.55.2.15534