Lower secondary school students’ interest and emotions regarding dissection in schools - a pilot study

Authors

  • Iztok Tomažič

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14720/abs.60.1.15671

Keywords:

animals, dissection, interest, emotions, secondary school students

Abstract

In the present study, we investigated lower secondary school student’s interest and emotions regarding dissection in schools. Self-reported interest and emotions of fear and disgust toward dissection were assessed. In addition to well-known gender differences from prior studies, the author also assessed if age, participation in home cooking of meat and fish or participation in the home slaughtering and butchering of livestock has an effect on these mentioned dependent variables. The results show, that situational interest was predominantly influenced by the students’ age. Older students displayed higher interest in school dissections. Individual interest was influenced by grade, gender and by participation in home slaughtering. Emotions concerning dissection were significantly influenced by gender. Situational interest was predicted both by personal interest and negative emotions. From the results, it can be concluded that participation in home cooking and home slaughtering of livestock has no effect on students’ interest and emotions regarding dissection, which is somehow contradictory to the statements of other authors who argue that repeated exposure to dissections raises student’s interest and lowers negative emotions regarding dissections. Perhaps spatial and temporal dimensions ought to be considered in addition to the level of students’ involvement in such activities.

References

Abrahams, I., 2009. Does Practical Work Really Motivate? A Study of the Affective Value of Practical Work in Secondary School Science. International Journal of Science Education, 31(17), 2335-2353.

Allchin, D., 2005. “Hands-off” Dissection? What Do We Seek in Alternatives to Examining Real Organisms? The American Biology Teacher, 67(6), 369-372+374.

Barr, G., Herzog, H., 2000. Fetal Pig: The High School Dissection Experience. Society & Animals, 8(1), 53-69.

Cho, M. J., Hwang, Y., 2013. Students’ perception of anatomy education at a Korean medical college with respect to time and contents. Anatomy & Cell Biology, 46(2), 157-162.

De Villiers, R., Monk, M., 2005. The first cut is the deepest: reflections on the state of animal dissection in biology education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(5), 583-600.

Ekman P., 1999. Basic Emotions. Handbook of Cognition and Emotion. Dalgleish T. (ur.), Power M. J. (ur.). Sussex: UK, John Wiley & Sons: 45-60.

Hug, B., 2008. Re-examining the practice of dissection: What does it teach? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(1), 91-105.

Fančovičová, J., Prokop, M., Lešková, A., 2013. Perceived Disgust and Personal Experiences are Associated with Acceptance of Dissections in Schools. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 9(3), 311-318.

Hidi, S., Renninger, K. A., 2006. The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41, 111-127.

Holstermann, N., Grube, D., Bögeholz, S., 2009. The influence of emotion on students› performance in dissection exercises. Journal of Biological Education, 43(4), 164-168.

Holstermann, N., Ainley, M., Grube, D., Roick, T., Bögeholz, S., 2012. The specific relationship between disgust and interest: Relevance during biology class dissections and gender differences. Learning and Instruction, 22(3), 185-192.

Houwink, A. P., Kurup, A. N., Kollars, J. P., Kollars, C. A. K., Carmichael, S. W., Pawlina, W., 2004.

Help of Third-Year Medical Students Decreases First-Year Medical Students› Negative Psychological Reactions on the First Day of Gross Anatomy Dissection. Clinical Anatomy, 17(4), 328-333.

Kinzie, M. B., Strauss, R., Foss, J., 1993. The effects of an interactive dissection simulation on the performance and achievement of high school biology students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(8), 989-1000.

Leech, N. L., Barrett, K. C., Morgan, G. A., 2005. SPSS for Intermediate Statistics: Use and Interpretation. 2. ed. Mahwah: NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Lock, R., 1995. GCSE students’ attitudes to dissection and using animals in research and product testing. School Science Review, 77(279), 15-21.

Lock R., Alderman P., 1996. Using animals in secondary school science lessons: Teacher experience and attitude. Journal of Biological Education, 30(2), 112-118.

Maloney, R., 2005. Exploring virtual fetal pig dissection as a learning tool for female high school biology students. Educational Research and Evaluation, 11(6), 591-603.

Mintzes, J. J., Wandersee J. H., Novak J. D., 1998. Teaching Science for Understanding: A Human Constructivist View. San Diego, Academic Press: 360pp. National Association of Biology Teachers [NABT], 2008. The use of animals in biology education. NABT Position Statements. Retrieved 06.02.17, from. http:// http://www.nabt.org/websites/institution/index.php?p=97.

Nedižavec, K., 2009. Žive živali, živali iz trajnih zbirk in ostali materiali živalskega izvora pri pouku bioloških vsebin v osnovnih in srednjih šolah: Diplomsko delo. Ljubljana: 98 pp.. Offner, S., 1993. The importance of dissection in biology teaching. The American Biology Teacher,

(3), 147-149.

Oakley J., 2012. Science teachers and the dissection debate: Perspectives on animal dissection and alternatives. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 7(2), 253-267.

Osenkowski, P., Green, C., Tjaden, A., Cunniff, P., 2015. Evaluation of educator & student use of & attitudes toward dissection & dissection alternatives. The American Biology Teacher, 77(5), 340-346.

Palmer, D. H., Dixon, J., Archer, J., 2016. Identifying underlying causes of situational interest in a science course for preservice elementary teachers. Science Education, 100(6), 1039-1061.

Predavec, M., 2001. Evaluation of E-Rat, a computer-based rat dissection, in terms of student learning outcomes. Journal of Biological Education, 35(2), 75-80.

Prokop, P., Tunnicliffe, S.D., 2010. Effects of keeping pets at home on children’s attitudes toward popular and unpopular animals. Anthrozoös, 23(1), 21-35.

Randler, C., Wüst-Ackermann, P., Vollmer, C., Hummel, E., 2012. The relationship between disgust, state-anxiety and motivation during a dissection task. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(3), 419-424.

Renninger, K. A., Hidi, S., 2011. Revisiting the conceptualization, measurement, and generation of interest. Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 168-184.

Rizzolo, L. J., Stewart, W. B., 2006. Should we continue teaching anatomy by dissection when…? The Anatomical Record (Part B: The New Anatomist), 289B(6), 215-218.

Rozin, P., Haidt, J., McCauley, C. R. (2008). Disgust. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions, 3rd ed. (pp. 757-776). New York: Guilford Press. Špernjak, A., Šorgo, A., 2017. State of Dissection of Mammalian Organs and Opinions about Dissection

among Lower and Upper Secondary School Students. C E P S Journal, 7(1), 111-130.

Tolin, D. F., Woods, C. M., Abramowitz, J. S., 2006. Disgust sensitivity and obsessive–compulsive symptoms in a non-clinical sample. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 37(1), 30-40.

Downloads

Published

01.07.2017

Issue

Section

Original Research Paper

How to Cite

Tomažič, I. (2017). Lower secondary school students’ interest and emotions regarding dissection in schools - a pilot study. Acta Biologica Slovenica, 60(1), 89-99. https://doi.org/10.14720/abs.60.1.15671