Learning the process of the cell cycle in 13- and 14 year-olds
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14720/abs.56.2.16126Keywords:
mitosis, cell cycle, understanding, biology, 13-year-olds, 14-year-oldsAbstract
The new biology curriculum introduced the teaching of mitosis to 13- and 14-year-olds students in Slovenia. Mitosis is a challenging topic for this age. In our study, we enrolled a sample group of 95 students to check if the method of teaching mitosis first described by Danieley (1990) could be effective for students of this age. Prior to the survey, the students had not yet dealt with the division of cells; most of them did not even know that all living organisms are made of cells. The results show that this method is effective; enrolled students used logical reasoning and were thus able to understand how the events in the cell cycle and the process of mitosis follow one another. The majority of students correctly arranged 15 drawings presenting the stages of the cell cycle after the lesson, and their knowledge retention was satisfactory. Incorrect placements of drawings did not show any typical mistakes in students thinking about the cell cycle that should create specific concerns for the biology teachers.
References
Banet, E., Ayuso, E., 2000. Teaching Genetics at Secondary School: A Strategy for Teaching about the Location of Inheritance Information. Journal of Science Education, 84 (3) 313–351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<313::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-N
Castro, J., 2009. Misconceptions in Genetics: Genes and Inheritance. Accessed 6/12/2012. Available online at: http://www.csun.edu/~jcc62330/coursework/690/Assignments/castro_misconception. pdf.
Cavallo, A. M. L., 1992. Student’s Meaningful Learning Orientation and Their Meaningful Understanding of Meisosis and Genetics. (Conference Paper). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED356140).
Cavallo, A. M. L., 1996. Meaningful Learning, Reasoning Ability, and Students’ Understanding and Problem Solving of Topics in Genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(6), 625–656. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199608)33:6<625::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-Q
Danieley, H., 1990. Exploring Mitosis through the Learning Cycle. The American Biology Teacher, 52(5), 295–296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4449113
Dikmenli, M., 2010. Misconceptions of Cell Division Held by Student Teachers in Biology: a Drawing Analysis. Scientific Research and Essay, 5(2), 235–247.
Fakin, T., 2012. Znanje in odnos učencev do metuljev in komarjev [Elementary school students’ knowledge and attitudes toward butterflies and mosquitoes]. Unpublished graduation thesis, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Fisher, K. M., 1985. A Misconception in Biology: Amino Acids and Translation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(1), 53–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660220105
Lawson, A. E., 1991. Exploring Growth (and Mitosis) Through a Learning Cycle. The American biology teacher, 53(2), 107–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4449232
Lawson, A. E., Thompson, L.D., 1988. Formal reasoning Ability and Misconceptions Concerning Genetics and Natural Selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(9), 733–746. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660250904
Lewis, J., Kattmann, U., 2004. Traits, Genes, Particles and Information: Re-visting Students Understandings of Genetic. Journal of Science Education, 26, 195–206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000072782
Locke, J., McDermid, H. E., 2005. Using Pool Noodles to Teach Mitosis and Meiosis. Genetics, 170(1), 5–6. Accessed 6/12/2012. Available online at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1449698/. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.104.032060
Mbaijorgu, N. M., Ezechi, N. G., Idoko, E. C., 2007. Addressing Nonscientific Presuppositions in Genetics Using a Conceptual Change Strategy. Accessed 6/12/2012. Available online at: www.interscience.wiley.com.
Mintzes, J. J., Wandersee, J. H., Novak, J. D., 2001. Assessing Understanding in Biology. Journal of Biological Education, 35(3), 118–124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2001.9655759
Newton, D., 2004. Teaching Tricky Science Concepts. Warwickshire, UK: Scholastic Ltd. Novak, J. D., 1988. Learning Science and the Science of Learning. Studies in Science Education, 15, 77–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057268808559949
Shields, M., 2006. Biology Inquiries. San Francisco, CA:Yossey-Bass. Smith, M. U., Sims, S. O. (1992). Cognitive Development, Genetics Problem Solving, and Genetics Instruction: A Critical Review. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 701–713. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290707
Stavroulakis, A. M., 2005. Meio-socks and other Genetic Yarns. The American Biology Teacher, 67(4), 233–238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4451827
Strgar, J., 2010. Biological Knowledge of Slovenian Students in the Living Systems Content Area in PISA 2006. Acta Biologica Slovenica, 53(2), 99–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14720/abs.53.2.15509
Štraus, M., Repež, M., Štigl., S. (eds.), 2006. Nacionalno poročilo PISA 2006: naravoslovi in matematični dosežki slovenskih učencev (National report PISA 2006: achievements of Slovenian students in the field of science and mathematics). Ljubljana: National centre PISA, Pedagoški
inštitut. Venville, G., Gribble, S., Donovan, J., 2005. An Exploration of Young Children’s Understandings of Genetics Concepts from Ontological and Epistemological Perspectives. Science Education, 89, 614–633. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20061
Venville, G. J., Treagust, D. F., 1998. Exploring conceptual Change in Genetics Using a Multidimensional Interpretive Framework. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(9), 1031–1055. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199811)35:9<1031::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-E
Watts, M. and Jofili, Z., 1998. Toward Critical Constructivistic Teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 159–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200204
Williams, M., Montgomery, B. L., Manokore, V., 2012. From Phenotype to Genotype: Exploring Middle School Students’ Understanding of Genetic Inheritance in a Web-Based Environment. The American Biology Teacher, 74(1), 35–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2012.74.1.8
Wyn, M., Stegink, S., 2000. Role-playing Mitosis. The American Biology Teacher, 62(5), 378–381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4450924
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
