Light-modulation of bark photosynthesis in birch (Betula pendula Roth.)

Christiane Wittman; Hardy Pfanz

doi:10.14720/abs.46.2.16671

Authors

Christiane Wittman Institute of Applied Botany, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
Hardy Pfanz Institute of Applied Botany, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14720/abs.46.2.16671

Keywords:

Betula, bark, photosynthesis, light intensity, carbon fluxes, CO2 fixation

Abstract

Bark photosynthesis has been shown to be an effective mechanism for stem-internal refixation of respiratory CO . In young birch trees (Betula pendula Roth.) this function is clearly modulated by the prevailing light intensity regime. Although positive net photosynthesis was not found in intact birch twigs, apparent twig respiration was reduced upon illumination by 65 % in high-light grown birches and even more in shade grown trees (81 %). Compared on a unit area basis the bark chlorenchyma contained up to 55% of the chlorophyll of the concomitant leaves when grown under 100 % sunlight and even 66 % when trees were grown under low-light (20 % of full sunlight). Light penetration through the periderm of birch twigs and branches is age-dependent and ranges in control trees from roughly 24 % of the incident sunlight in recent-year twigs to 1-3 % in 5-year-old main stems. Peridermal light transmittance was also changed by the light intensity regime. An additional light-reducing peridermal layer present in control trees was not found in shade-grown birches. It was shown that CO -refixation is not limited to the light exposed outer parts of tree crowns. Our results show that also inner branches of trees are well adapted to function as a rather efficient system to prevent respiratory carbon loss.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ANDERSON J.M., OSMOND C.B. 1987: Shade-sun responses: compromises between acclimation and photoinhibition. In: Kyle D.J., Osmond C.B., Arntzen C.J. (eds.) Photoinhibition. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1-38.

ASCHAN G., WITTMANN C., PFANZ H. 2001: Age-dependent bark photosynthesis of aspen twigs. Trees 15: 431-437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004680100120

CERNUSAK L.A., MARSHALL J.D. 2000: Photosynthetic refixation in branches of western white pine. Funct. Ecol. 14: 300-311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.2000.00436.x

KAUPPI A. 1991: Seasonal fluctuations in chlorophyll content in birch stems with special reference to bark thickness and light transmission, a comparison between sprouts and seedlings. Flora 185: 107-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0367-2530(17)30456-5

KHAROUK V.I., MIDDLETON E.M., SPENCER S.L., RocK B.N., WILLIAMS D.L. 1995: Aspen bark photosynthesis and ist significance to remote sensing and carbon budget estimate in the boreal ecosystem. Water Air Soil Pollut. 82: 483-497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0942-2_46

LARCHER W. 1994: Okophysiologie der Pflanzen: Leben, Leistung und Stressbewaltigung der Pflanzen in ihrer Umwelt. 5th edn. Ulmer, Stuttgart, Germany.

LARCHER W., LOTZ C., NAGELE M., BODNER M. 1988: Photosynthetic functioning and ultrastructure od chloroplasts in stem tissue of Fagus sylvatica. J. Plant. Physiol. 132: 731-737. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(88)80237-2

LICHTENTHALER H.K., BuscHMANN C., D6LL M., FIETZ H.-J., BAcH T., KozEL U., MEIER D., RAHMSDORF U. 1981: Photosynthetic activity, chloroplast ultrastructure, and leaf characteristics of high light and low-light plants and of sun and shade leaves. Photosynthesis Res. 2: 115-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00028752

NILSEN E.T. 1995: Stem photosynthesis - extent, patterns and role in plant carbon economy. In: Gartner B. (ed.) Plant stems: physiology and functional morphology. Academic Press, San Diego,pp. 223-240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012276460-8/50012-6

PFANZ H. 1999: Photosynthetic performance of twigs and stems of trees with and without stress. Phyton 39: 29-33.

PFANZ H., AscHAN G. 2000: The existence of bark and stem photosynthesis and its significance for the overall carbon gain: an eco-physiological and ecological approach. Progress in Botany 62: 477-510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56849-7_19

PFANZ H., AscHAN G., LANGENFELD-HEYSER R., WITTMANN C., LoosE M. 2002: Ecology and ecophysiology of tree stems - corticular and wood photosynthesis. Naturwissenschaften 89, 147-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-002-0309-z

PILARSKI J. 1995: Participation of stems and leaves in photosynthetic assimilation of CO2 in lilac (Syringa vulgaris L.). Photosynthetica 31: 585-592.

PILARSKJJ. 1999: Gradient of photosynthetic pigments in the bark and leaves oflilac (Syringa vulgaris L.). Acta Physiologicae Plantarum 21: 365-373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-999-0008-x

SPRUGEL D.G., BENECKE U. 1991: Measuring woody-tissue respiration and photosynthesis. In: LASSOIE J.P., HINCKLEY T.M. (eds.) Techniques and approaches in forest tree ecophysiology. CRC, Boca Raton, pp. 329-355.

TERASHIMA I., HIKOSAKA K. 1995: Comparative ecophysiology of leaf and canopy photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ 18: 1111-1128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00623.x

VoGELMANN 1993: Plant tissue optics. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Mo!. Biol. 44: 231-251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.44.060193.001311

WARING R.H. & RUNNING S.W. 1998: Forest Ecosystems: Analysis at multiple scales. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.

WELLBURN A.R. 1994: The spectral determination of chlorophylls a and b, as well as total carotenoids, using various solvents with pectrophotometers of different resolution. J. Plant. Physiol. 144: 307-313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(11)81192-2

WITTMANN C., AscHAN G., PFANZ H. 2001: Leaf and twig photosynthesis of young beech (Fagus sylvatica) and aspen (Populus tremula) trees grown under different light intensity regimes. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2: 145-154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1078/1439-1791-00047

VoN WILLERT D.J., MATYSSEK R., HERPPICH W. 1995: Experimentelle Pflanzenokologie. - Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, New York.