Mitigation Strategies in Semi-structured Oral Chinese Interviews
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4312/ala.13.1.73-90Keywords:
Chinese language, linguistic mitigation, linguistic resources, discursive strategies, pragmatics choiceAbstract
This paper identifies and accounts for mitigation strategies in a corpus of language that attempts to reflect the communicative style of Chinese speakers in semi-structured oral interviews. Thus, the analysis was carried out on the informal conversations of the C-ORAL-CHINA corpus. Mitigating resources were classified and grouped into seven general procedures that constitute different strategic mechanisms with which mitigation is carried out. Regarding the strategic mechanisms through which mitigation was carried out in these semi-structured oral Chinese interviews, the most common strategies were the following: the use of resources that downgrade what has been said or done, the use of resources that involve the addressee in what has been said or done, and the use of resources that limit or restrict what has been said or done. Conversely, the strategies of correcting or repairing what has been said, justifying, and defocalizing had the lowest frequency of use.
Downloads
References
Albelda Marco, M., Briz Gómez, A., Cestero Mancera, A., Kotwica, D., & Villalba Ibánez, C. (2014). Ficha metodológica para el análisis pragmático de la atenuación en corpus discursivos del español. (ES.POR.ATENUACIÓN) (Methodological datasheet for the pragmatic analysis of mitigation in Spanish discourse corpora. (ES.POR.MITIGATION)). Oralia, 17, 7–62. https://DOI: 10.25115/oralia.v17i.7999 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25115/oralia.v17i.7999
Albelda Marco, M., & Briz Gómez, A. (2020). Atenuación e intensificación (Mitigation and intensification). In Mª V. Escandell-Vidal, J. Amenós-Pons, & A. Kathleen Ahern (coord.), Pragmática (Pragmatics) (pp. 567–590). Madrid: Akal. AKAL, Madrid.
Alleton, V. (1988). The so-called “rhetorical interrogation” Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 16 (2), 278-297. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23757861
Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (eds.) (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Norwood (NJ): Ablex Publishing.
Caffi, C. (2007). Mitigation. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00392-8
Cestero Mancera, A. M. (1999). La risa en conversación (Laughter in conversation). In J. A. Samper, & M. Troya (coords.), Actas del XI Congreso Internacional de la Asociación de Lingüística y Filología de la América Latina (Proceedings of the XI International Congress of the Association of Latin American Linguistics and Philology), I (pp. 599-608). Las Palmas de Gran Canaria: Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria.
Cestero Mancera, A. M. (2020). Uses and resources of mitigation, in contrast. Spanish in Context, 17 (2), 362-383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.00063.ces
Cestero Mancera, A. M., & Albelda Marco, M. (2020). Estudio de variación en el uso de atenuación I: Hacia una descripción de patrones dialectales y sociolectales de la atenuación en español (Study of variation in the use of mitigation I: Towards a description of dialectal and sociolectal patterns of mitigation in Spanish). Revista signos (Signs journal), 53, 935-961. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-09342020000300935 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-09342020000300935
Cestero Mancera, A. M., & Albelda Marco, M. (forthcoming). La atenuación en español: patrones sociolingüísticos y geolectales. Hacia un mapa de la atenuación en español (Mitigation in Spanish: sociolinguistic and geolectal patterns. Towards a map of mitigation in Spanish). Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación.
Chen Guo-Ming (2011). An introduction to key concepts in understanding the Chinese: Harmony as the foundation of Chinese communication. China Media Research 7(4), 1-12.
Chen Guo-Ming, & Ma Ringo (2002). Chinese conflict management and resolution. EEUU: Greenwood.
Dong Yang (2011). Compilación de un corpus de habla espontánea de chino "putonghua" para su aplicación en la enseñanza como lengua segunda a hispanohablantes (Compilation of a "putonghua" Chinese spontaneous speech corpus for use in teaching Spanish as a second language to Spanish speakers). Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. PhD thesis. Retrieved from https://repositorio.uam.es/handle/10486/13064
Du Jinwen S. (1995). Performance of face-threatening acts in Chinese: Complaining, giving bad news, and disagreeing. In G. Kasper (Ed.), Pragmatics of Chinese as a native and target language (165–206). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
Fang Hongmei, & Hengeveld, Kees (2020). A mitigator in Mandarin: The sentence-final particle ba (吧). Open Linguistics, 6, 284-306. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2020-0018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2020-0018
Figueras Bates, C. (2020). Mitigation in discourse: Social, cognitive and affective. motivations when exchanging advice. Journal of Pragmatics, 173, 119-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.12.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.12.008
Fraser, B. (1980). Conversational mitigation. Journal of pragmatics, 4(4), 341-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(80)90029-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(80)90029-6
Gao, G., & Ting-Toomey, S. (1998). Communicating effectively with the Chinese. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452220659
Han Yang (1988). A pragmatic study of some sentence-final and post-verbal particles in Mandarin Chinese. York: University of York. PhD thesis. Retrieved from https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/4278/
Holmes, J. (1984). Modifying illocutionary force. Journal of pragmatics, 8 (3), 345-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(84)90028-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(84)90028-6
Hsin Ai-li C. (2016). An analysis of Chinese tag questions with a cross-linguistic comparison to English tags. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 14, 69-119. https://doi.org/10.6519/TJL.2016.14(1).3
Jiang Xiangping (2012). A pragmatic analysis of V+ yixia in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(13), 1888–1901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.08.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.08.004
Kendrick, K. (2018). Adjusting epistemic gradients: The final particle ba in Mandarin Chinese conversation. East Asian Pragmatics, 3 (1), 5-26. https://doi.org/10.1558/10.1558/eap.36120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/10.1558/eap.36120
Kotwica, D. (2020). Mitigation and reinforcement in general knowledge expressions. Journal of Pragmatics, 169, 219-230 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.016
Lakoff, G. (1972). Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. In P. Peranteau, J. N. Levi, & G. Phares (Eds.), Papers from the 8th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 183-228). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Li, Ch., & Thompson, S. (1989). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. California: University of California Press.
Li Xinghua (2016). Aspectos contrastivos de los actos de habla de petición en chino y en español (Contrastive aspects of Chinese and Spanish request speech acts). Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid. PhD thesis. Retrieved from http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/18815
Lim Ni-Eng (2011). From subjectivity to intersubjectivity: Epistemic marker wo juede in Chinese. In Yun Xiao, Tao Liang, & Hooi Ling Soh (Eds.), Current issues in Chinese linguistics (pp. 265-300), Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.
Lin Chih Ying, Woodfield, H., & Ren Wei (2012). Compliments in Taiwan and Mainland Chinese: The influence of region and compliment topic. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(11), 1486-1502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.06.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.06.012
Ma Ringo (1996). Saying “yes” for “no” and “no” for “yes”: Chinese rule. Journal of Pragmatics, 25, 257‐266. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00098-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00098-0
Overstreet, M. (2011). Vagueness and hedging. In Gisle Andersen & Karin Aijmer (ed.), Pragmatics of Society (pp. 293-318). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214420.293 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214420.293
Pan Yuling (2000). Politeness in Chinese Face to Face Interaction. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Pan Yulin, & Kádar, D. Z. (2012). Politeness in historical and contemporary Chinese. London: Continuum.
PRESEEA (2014-): Corpus del Proyecto para el estudio sociolingüístico del español de España y de América (Corpus of the Project for the sociolinguistic study of Spanish in Spain and America). Alcalá de Henares: Universidad de Alcalá, Retrieved from http://preseea.linguas.net.
Querol-Bataller, M. (2022). Research on mitigation in the Chinese language. East Asian Pragmatics, 7(1), 97-121. https://doi.org/10.1558/eap.18721 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/eap.18721
Ren Wei, Lin Chih-Ying, & Woodfield, H. (2013). Variational pragmatics in Chinese: Some insights from an empirical study. In I. Kecskes, & J. Romero Trillo (Ed.), Research trends in intercultural pragmatics (pp. 283-314). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614513735.283
Ren Wei (2015). Sociopragmatic variation in Mainland and Taiwan Chinese refusals. In Researching sociopragmatic variability (72–93). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137373953_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137373953_4
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Maria Querol-Bataller
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitting article, which will be published online in journal Acta Linguistica Asiatica by Ljubljana University Press, Faculty of Arts (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, Aškerčeva 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). Author’s name will be evident in the article in journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in hands of the publisher.
- Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
