A Cross-Cultural Study on Hedging Devices in Kurdish Conversation

Biook BEHNAM; Salam KHALILIAQDAM

doi:10.4312/ala.2.1.73-88

Authors

Biook BEHNAM Department of English Language, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
Salam KHALILIAQDAM Department of English Language, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4312/ala.2.1.73-88

Keywords:

Hedging Devices, Kurdish Language, Spoken Discourse

Abstract

Hedges are words whose job is to make things fuzzier or less fuzzy. Truth and falsity are a matter of degree, and hedges make natural language sentences more/less true or more/less false. The purpose of the study is to investigate hedging devices in Kurdish spoken language. The aim is to know how hedging devices are used in Kurdish spoken discourse. Also the researchers are willing to know whether Kurdish speakers use hedging devices to indicate a lack of complete commitment to the truth of the proposition, and a desire not to express the commitment categorically, or to lessen the impact of an utterance. The data needed for the study was collected through observation, tape recording, and interviews. The dialogues of 35 people were recorded by the researchers as well as the researchers have interviewed with 21 people from different social classes.15 classes and meetings which Kurdish language was the means of communication were observed. The research showed that hedging as a mitigating device is extensively employed in different conversations. The study shows that hedging devices have the same roles in Kurdish as they have in English. They are used to reduce the certainty and sureness of the utterances. It indicates that some pragmatic devices modify the epistemic strength of the statement in Kurdish language just as they do in English and Arabic.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Biook BEHNAM, Department of English Language, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran

Professor in Islamic Azad University of Tabriz
Salam KHALILIAQDAM, Department of English Language, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran

Islamic Azad University of Boukan
Head of language Department

References

Aijmer, K. (1984) "Sort of and kind of in English conversation" Studia Linguistica, 38 (2): 18–128.

Ayodapo, Joel O. (2007) "Hedging: The pragmatics of politeness in English" Lagos Papers in English Studies, 1, 257-270.

Brown, P. and Levinson, S. (1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

Bruce, F. (2010) "Hedging in political discourse: The Bush 2007 press conferences" in Okulska, Urszula & Cap, Piotr (Eds.). Perspectives on Politics and Discourse,36, 201-214. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: JohnBenjamins Publishing Company

Btoosh, M. (1999) "Hedging in journalistic Arabic" MA Dissertation. Yarmouk University, Jordan.

Btoosh, M. (2004) "Interlanguage lexicology of Arab students of English: A computer-learner corpus-based approach" Doctoral dissertation. University of Texas at Arlington, USA.

Channell J. (1994) Vague Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chavez, D. (2004) "The language of uncertainty in a new illness: Hedging and modality in the biomedical discourse of Sever Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)" Doctoral dissertation. University of Mahidol.

Donesch-Jezo, E. (2010) "Teaching academic discourse writing in ESP courses for medical students and professionals" US-China Foreign Language, 8,(1), 32-39.

Dubois, B.L. (1987) "Something in the order of around forty to forty four" Imprecise numerical expressions in biomedical slide talks. Language and Society, 16, 527-541.

Fishman, P. M. (I978) "Interaction: the Work Women Do" in Thorne, Kramarae and Henley, eds., 89-101.

Fraser, B. (1975) "Hedged performatives" in P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3.New York: Academic Press, 187–210.

Fraser, B. (1996) "Pragmatic markers" Pragmatics, 6,2 (1996): 167–190.

Halliday, M.A.K. (1985) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold

Holmes, J. (1999) Women, Men and Politeness. Longman Group, UK Limited

Hubler, A. (1983) Understatements and hedges in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Hyland K. (1998) Hedging in scientific research articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins,.

Hyland, K. (1996) "Writing without Conviction? Hedging in Science Research Articles" Applied Linguistics, 17,4.

Kay, P. (1984) "The kind of/sort of construction" Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society.

Lakoff G. (1972) "Hedges: a study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts" Chicago Linguistic Society, 8,183–228

Lakoff, R. (1975) Language and Women’s Place, New York: Harper & Row.

Markkanen, R. & Schröder, H. (2006) "Hedging: a Challenge for Pragmatics and Discourse Analysis" http://www. sw2.euv-frankfurt-o.de/Publikationen/hedging/ markkane/markkane.html.

Perkins, M. (1983) Modal express low in English. London: Frances Pinter.

Pindi, M. & Bloor, T. (1987) "Playing safe with predictions: Hedging, attribution and conditions in economic forecasting" in T. Bloor, and J. Norrish (Eds.) Written Language. CILT, 55-69.Politics and Discourse,36, 201-214. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Prince, E., J. Frader and C. Bosk (1982) "On hedging in physician-physician discourse" in R. J. Di Pietro (ed.), Linguistics and the professions. Proceedings of the second annual delaware symposium on language studies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 83–97.

Pyle, C. (1975) "The functions of indirectness" Paper Read at N-WAVE IV Georgetown University. Quirk, R. (1978). Language and Tabu. New Society.

Rakow, L. F. (1986) "Rethinking gender research in communication" Journal of Communication,36, 11-26.

Safi, M. (1988). "Conditional sentences in English and Arabic: A contrast- error analysis for translation purposes" (Unpublished M.A. Thesis).

Schröder, H. and D. Zimmer (1997) "Hedging research in pragmatics; A bibliographical research guide to hedging" in R. Markkanen and H. Schröder (Eds.), Hedging and discourse. Approaches to the analysis of a pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 249–271.

Thome, B., & Henley, N. (1975) "Difference and dominance: An overview of language, gender and society" in B. Thorne & N. Henley (Eds.), Language and gender: Difference and dominance. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Thome, B., Kramarae, C., & Henley, N. (Eds.) (1983) "Language, gender and society" Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Uchida, A. (1992) "When 'difference' is 'dominance': A critique of the 'anti powerbased' cultural approach to sex differences" Language in Society, 21, 547-568.

Varttala, T. (2001) "Hedging in scientifically oriented Discourse: Exploring variation according to discipline and intended audience" Doctoral dissertation. University of Tampere.

Vass, H. (2004) "Socio-cognitive aspects of hedging in two legal discourse genres" IBÉRICA, 7, 125-141.

Vazquez, I. & Giner, D. (2008) "Beyond mood and modality: Epistemic modality markers as hedges in research articles" Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 21, 171-190.

Vold E.T., (2006) "Epistemic modality markers in research articles: a cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary study" International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16, No. 1.

Zuck, J. & Zuck, L. (1986) "Hedging in news writing" In A. M. Cornu, J. Vanparijs, & M. Delahaye (Eds.) Beads or Bracelects: How Do We approach LSP?, 172-181. Leuven, Belgium: Oxford University Press.