PF Merger would Do, too: A Reply to Zhang (1997)
Keywords:Mandarin, third tone sandhi, PF merger
The analysis for the phenomenon that prepositions may or may not undergo the third tone sandhi in Mandarin in Zhang (1997) is reviewed. She considers that this phenomenon is short of sound coverage and couches her analysis in the framework of Optimality Theory (OT). However, upon scrutiny, Zhang’s analysis invites unnecessary questions. The postulation of two “constituent strength” constraints is with no foundation. It is difficult to grab the idea behind the constituent-strength concept even till now. Related to the concept, the non-specification of a prepositional phrase is not clear. Instead, the syntactic feature manifestation could mark a preposition’s uniqueness. In addition, the misuse of the Generalized Alignment and stipulations toward the evaluations in OT are spotted, too. My synthetic approach, based on the extant and developing knowledge about constituency, PF merger, and Shih’s (1997) foot formation, shows that for this phenomenon, no new device is needed.
Baker, M., & Hale, K. (1990). Relativized Minimality and pronoun incorporation. Linguistic Inquiry, 21(2), 289-297.
Bošković, Ž. (2001). On the nature of the syntax-phonology interface: Cliticization and related phenomena. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
Chen, M. Y. [陳淵泉] (2000). Tone sandhi: Patterns across Chinese dialects. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Cinque, G. (1993). A null theory of phrase and compound stress. Linguistic Inquiry, 24(2), 239-297.
Grimshaw, J. (2005). Extended Projection. In J. Grimshaw, Words and structure (pp. 1-73). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Halle, M., & Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger (pp. 111-176). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Kager, R. (1999). Optimality Theory. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Lasnik, H., & Lohndal, T. (2010). Government-binding/principles and parameters theory. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1(1), 40-50.
McCarthy, J. J., & Prince, A. (1993). Generalized Alignment. In G. Gooij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1993 (pp. 79-153). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Scheer, T. (2008). Spell out your sister!. In N. Abner & J. Bishop (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th west coast conference on formal linguistics (pp. 379-387). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Shih, C. [石基琳] (1997). Mandarin third tone sandhi and prosodic structure. In J. Wang [王嘉齡] & N. Smith (Eds.), Studies in Chinese phonology (pp. 81-123). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
Van der Hulst, H. (2004). Phonological dialectics: A short history of generative phonology. In P. van Sterkenburg (Ed.), Linguistics today: Facing a greater challenge (pp. 217-242). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Vaux, B. (2008). Why the phonological component must be serial and rule-based. In B. Vaux and A. Nevins (Eds.), Rules, constraints, and phonological phenomena (pp. 20-60). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Wee, L.-H. [黃良喜] (2008). Opacity from constituency. Language and Linguistics, 9(1), 127-160.
Xu, D. [許德寶] (1992). Mandarin tone sandhi and the interface study between phonology and syntax. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Xu, D. B. [許德寶] (1999). A syntactic account for the inseparability of the verb and the classifier in the structure V+C+N in tone sandhi. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 34(3), 77-90.
Zhang, N. [張寧] (1997). The avoidance of the third tone sandhi in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 6(4), 293-338.
Zwicky, A. M., & Pullum, G. K. (1983). Cliticization vs. inflection: English n’t. Language, 59(3), 502-513.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2011 David Ta-Chun SHEN
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitting article, which will be published online in journal Acta Linguistica Asiatica by Ljubljana University Press, Faculty of Arts (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, Aškerčeva 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). Author’s name will be evident in the article in journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in hands of the publisher.
- Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.