Acquisition Of Hindi Contrasts By English Speakers: An Optimality Theoretic Account


  • Ashima AGGARWAL University of Florida



voicing, aspiration, acquisition, optimality theory, voice onset time


This paper provides an optimality theoretic account of perception of Hindi voicing and aspiration contrasts by English monolinguals. The participants were presented with minimal pairs of stop consonants belonging to three places of articulation, namely, bilabial, alveolar and velar. The minimal pairs varied in (a) voice; (b) aspiration; (c) voice and aspiration. The methodology involved taking a discrimination test wherein the English speakers reported whether the minimal pairs they heard were same or different. The findings were then subjected to quantitative analysis. The results show that aspiration distinction is clearly perceived by English monolinguals but voicing contrast is neutralized in the same position. The study adds to our knowledge of existing phonological theories such as Best’s perceptual Assimilation Model (2001) and p-maps (Steriade, 2001). Based on the phonetic results, an optimality theoretic framework is applied to describe the results. The framework involves the ranking of faithfulness and markedness constraints and presenting an initial stage grammar for the L2 English learner of Hindi. In the end, some predictions are made about the further acquisition of these non-native contrasts by L2 English learners. The study has useful implications for adult second language learners.


Download data is not yet available.


Best, C., McRoberts,G., & Goodell, E. (2001). Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener’s native phonological system. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109 (2), 775-794.

Brown, C. (1998). The role of the L1 grammar in the L2 acquisition of segmental structure. Second Language Research 14, 136-193.

Flege, J. (1991). Age of learning affects the authenticity of voice onset time (VOT) in stop consonants produced in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 395-411.

Flege, J. (1992a) Speech learning in a second language. In C. Ferguson, L. Menn, & C. Stoel-Gammon (Eds.), Phonological Development: Models, Research, and Application (pp. 565-604). Timonium, MD: York Press.

Flege, J. (1992b). The Intelligibility of English vowel spoken by British and Dutch talkers. In R.Kent (Ed.), Intelligibility in Speech Disorders: Theory Measurement and Management (pp. 157-232). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Hancin-Bhatt, B. & R. Bhatt. (1997). Optimal L2 syllables. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19: 331-378.

Hancin-Bhatt, B. (2000). Optimality in second language phonology: Codas in Thai ESL. Second Language Research, pp. 201-232.

Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. S. (1964). Across-Language Study of Voicing in Initial Stops: Acous- tical Measurements. Word. Vol. 20 , pp. 384-422.

Steriade, D. (2001). The phonology of perceptibility effect: The p-map and its consequences for constraint organization. In K. Hanson & S. Inkelas (Eds.), The nature of the word (p. 151-179). Cambridge: MIT Press.

Tesar, B. & Smolensky, P. (1998). Learnability in Optimality Theory. Linguistic Inquiry 29:229–268.



23. 01. 2012



Research articles

How to Cite

AGGARWAL, A. (2012). Acquisition Of Hindi Contrasts By English Speakers: An Optimality Theoretic Account. Acta Linguistica Asiatica, 1(3), 9-24.