A Comparison of Event Framing in Old Japanese and Old Chinese


  • Wenchao LI Tohoku University Japan




Old Chinese, Old Japanese, event framing, path, manner


This paper brings data on Old Chinese and Old Japanese together in order to conduct an investigation into event-framing strategies. Old Chinese consists of a monosyllabic root with five constituents that express the path: (a) particle, (b) incorporated noun, (c) preverb, (d) verb root, and (e) complement.Verb framing,satellite framing, andequipollent framingare all found in the data. Crucially, before the birth of disyllabic word roots and verb compounding in the Late Han Dynasty,verb framingseems to have been the main pattern. Throughout the transformation of the Chinese language, the use of incorporated nouns and preverbs denoting the path has declined, with the remaining particles serving motion events. This contributes to the contention that contemporary Chinese is asatellite-framed language. Meanwhile, verb complements emerged and played the main role in non-motion events. In terms of Old Japanese, all three event-framing patterns have been observed. Moreover, the path is denoted via three means: prefix, auxiliary, and verb compounding. Among them, verb compounding appears to play the most significant role. These distinct event-framing patterns both intralinguistic and crosslinguistic are based on the diversity of lexical resources of motion/non-motion event framing and preferences for event-encoding options by selecting different lexical resources.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Wenchao LI, Tohoku University Japan
    Graduate school of International culture


Beavers, J. (2008). On the nature of goal marking and delimitation: evidence from Japanese. Journal of Linguistics, 44, 183-316.

Chen, L., & Guo, J. (2009). Motion events in Chinese novels: Evidence for an equipollently-framed language. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1749-1766.

Chou, F. (1962). A Historical Grammar of Ancient Chinese, Part II: Morphology. The Institute of History and Philology, Academia SinicPastecial Publications No. 39, Taipei.

Croft, W., Barðdal, J., Hollmann, W. B., Sotirova, V., & Taoka, C. (2010). Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions.. In Boas, H. C. (Ed.), Contrastive Studies in Construction Grammar (pp. 201-235). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Folli, R. & Ramchand, G. (2005). Prepositions and results in Italian and English: An analysis from event decomposition. In H. Verkuyl, A. van Hout & H. de Swart (Eds.), Perspectives on Aspect (pp. 1-20). Dordrecht: Springer.

Frellesvig, B. (2010). A History of the Japanese Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Frellesvig, B., Horn, S. W., Russell, K. L., & Sells, P. (2010). Verb semantics and argument realization in pre-modern Japanese: A preliminary study of compound verbs in Old Japanese. Gengo kenkyū, 138, 25-65.

Graham, A. C. (1973). China, Europe, and the Origins of Modern Science: Needham’s The Grand Titration. In S. Nakayama & N. Sivin (Eds.), Chinese Science. Explorations of an Ancient Tradition (pp. 45-69). Cambridge: MIT Press.

Hickmann, M. & Robert, S. (2006). Space in Languages: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Kageyama, T. (1999). Word formation. In N. Tsujimura (Ed.) The handbook of Japanese linguistics (pp. 297-325). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Karlgren, B. (1933). Word families in Chinese. Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities, 12, 1-471.

Kennedy, G. A. (1956). Zai lun wu wo (The Classical Pronoun Forms ngo and nga). Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia.

Li, C. N. & Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. University of California Press.

Lu, J. H.-T. (1973). The verb-verb construction with a directional complement in Mandarin. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 1, 239-255.

Matsumoto, Y. (1996). Complex predicates in Japanese: a syntactic and semantic study of the notion “word”. Stanford Center for the Study of Language and Information.

Matsumoto, Y. (1996). Kuukan no Gengo Hyugen to Sono Kakuchoo (Linguistic expressions of spatial motion and their extensitions). Kuukan to Idou no Hyogen. Kenkyuusha shuppan, 126-229.

Nikitina, T. (2008). Pragmatic Factors and Variation in the Expression of Spatial Goals: The Case of into vs. in. In A. Asbury, J. Dotlačil, B. Gehrke, & R. N (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics of Spatial P (pp. 175-209). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Peyraube, A. (2006). Motion events in Chinese: A diachronic study of directional complements. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in Languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (pp. 121–135). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Slobin, D. I. (1996). Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In M. S. Shibatani & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning (pp. 195–219). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Slobin, D. I. (2000). Verbalized events: a dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. In S. Niemeier & R. Dirven (Eds.), Evidence for linguistic relativity (pp. 107-138). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Slobin, D. I. (2004a). How people move: Discourse effects of linguistic typology. In C. L. Moder & A. Martinovic-Zic (Eds.), Discourse across languages and cultures (pp. 195–210). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Slobin, D. I. (2004b). The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating Events in Narrative (Vol. 2, pp. 219-257). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.

Slobin, D. I. (2006). What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (pp. 59–81). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Talmy, L. (1975). Semantics and syntax of motion. In J. Kimball (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics (Vol. IV, pp. 181–238). New York: Academic Press.

Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp. 36–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Talmy, L. (1991). Path to realization: A typology of event integration. Buffalo Working Papers in Linguistics, 91-01, SUNY, Buffalo, 147-187.

Talmy, L. (2000a). Toward a cognitive semantics, Vol. I: Concept-structuring systems. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Talmy, L. (2000b). Toward a cognitive semantics, Vol. II: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Wang, L. (1957-58). Hanyu shi gao. Beijing: Kexue yuan.

Zlatev, J. & P. Yangklang. (2004). A third way to travel. The place of Thai in motion-event typology. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating Events in Narrative: Typological and Contextual Perspectives (pp. 159–190), Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.



23. 01. 2012



Research articles

How to Cite

LI, W. (2012). A Comparison of Event Framing in Old Japanese and Old Chinese. Acta Linguistica Asiatica, 1(3), 57-72. https://doi.org/10.4312/ala.1.3.57-72