Language, Power and Gender: A Case Study of Code Switching by Less Educated People In Pakistan

Asim KARIM; Safina KANWAL

doi:10.4312/ala.3.3.21-36

Authors

Asim KARIM Associate Professor, University of Management and Technology lahore, Pakistan
Safina KANWAL PhD Scholar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4312/ala.3.3.21-36

Keywords:

Power, discourse, multiculturalism, code switching

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the relation between language, power and gender among less educated people. Less educated people here mean those who passed only middle class examination. Foucault’s theory of power and discourse gave new dimensions to languages. Language is used to exert power (Foucault, 1998). Due to this relationship of language and power, the speakers try to use that language as is enjoying power and high status in their speech community. Those of high status enjoying language is very much seen in the process of code switching where the speakers do code switching from low status enjoying language to high status enjoying language.

The major aims of this research were to find out the relation between language and power and how speakers’ use of powerful language varied across gender. This study was quantitative. Data collection was done through questionnaire comprising of two sections. The first section was consisted of 10 close ended questions to know the relation between language and power. The second section of the questionnaire comprising of 10 close ended questions measured the status of Punjabi and Urdu. After careful inquires 30 less educated L1 Punjabi speakers were randomly selected from the city Sheikhupura. Among these 30 participants 15 were male and 15 were female. Audio recording was taken from 14 participants, 7 males and 7 females who had also took part in survey questionnaire to get the data about Urdu code switching. The results collected through the gathered data revealed the L1 Punjabi speakers regarded Urdu as powerful language and they asserted that language and power are closely related with each other. Further women used more powerful language and for this purpose they did more Urdu code switching as compared to men.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Asim KARIM, Associate Professor, University of Management and Technology lahore, Pakistan

English Dept. University of management and Technology, Lahore Pakistan
Safina KANWAL, PhD Scholar

PhD scholar University of management and Technolgy Lahore pakistn

References

Al-Tamimi, A. & Shuib, M. (2009). Motivation and attitudes towards learning English: A study of Petroleum Engineering undergraduates at Hadhramout University of Science and Technology. GEMA Online Journal ofLanguage Studies, 9 (2), 29-55.

Bhatt, R. M. (2008). In other words: Language mixing, identity representation and third space. Sociolinguistics, 177-200.

Carrera-Sabaté, J. (2006). Some connections between linguistic change and the written language: The behavior of speakers aged 3 to 20. Language Variation and Change 18:15-34.

Eckert, P. & McConnell-Ginet, S. (2003).Language and Gender. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. London: Longman.

Foucault, M. (1991). Discipline and Punish: the birth of a prison. London, Penguin.

Foucault, M. (1998). The History of Sexuality: The Will to Knowledge. London, Penguin.

Foucault, M. 1980. “truth and Power”. Trans. Colin Gordon. In Power/Knowledge. New York : Pantheon Books

Gaventa, J. (2003). Power after Lukes: a review of the literature. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.

Khalique, H. (2006). The Urdu English relationship and its impact on Pakistan's social development. International Wissenschaftsforum Heidelberg International Workshop. Heidelberg.

Kim, L.S.; Siong, L.K.; Fei, W. F. & Ya'acob, A. (2010). The English language and its impact on identities of multilingual Malaysian undergraduates. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 10 (1), 87-101.

Migge, B. (2007). Code-switching and Social Identities in the Eastern Maroon Community of Suriname and French Guiana. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11/1, 2007: 53-73.

Norton, B. (2010). Language and identity. In N. H. Hornberger & S. L. McKay (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language education (pp. 349–369). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Nunan, D., & Choi, J. (2010). Language, culture and identity: Framing the issues. In D. Nunan &A. Choi (Eds.), Language and culture: Reflective narrative and the emergence of identity (pp. 1–13). New York: Routledge.

O’Farrel, C. (2005). Michel Foucault. Sage.

Phelan, S. Foucault and Feminism in American Journal of Poltical Science. Vol 34. No 2. Pp 421-440. Stable URL: http://www.Jstor.org/stable2111456. . Accessed12/04/2013.

Rajchman, J.1983. “Foucault and the Ends of Modernism”in October. Vol 24, pp37-62. Stable URL: http://www.Jstor.org/stable 778592. Accessed 28/3/2013.

Riaz, S. (2009). Exploration of the Socio-cultural, Linguistic and Psychological Factors involved in Intrasentential Code-switching from Urdu to English. Unpublished M.Phil thesis. Department of AIS, National University of Modern Languages, Islamabad.

Romaine, S. (2007): Preserving Endangered Languages. In: Language and Linguistics Compass 1 (1-2), 115-132.

Sunderland, J. (2004). Gendered Discourse. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Yun, S. (2008). Role-play and language socialization among bilingual Korean children in the United States. Simulation and Gaming, 39(2), 240-252.