Understanding Reference: Morphological Marking in Japanese

Authors

  • Shinichi SHOJI Mie University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4312/ala.7.1.9-21

Keywords:

reference, subject, object, topic, scrambling

Abstract

This study investigates reference resolution with repeated-name anaphors in Japanese, particularly focusing on (i) subject anaphor with the nominative postposition ga, (ii) topic-subject anaphor with the topic postposition wa, (iii) scrambled object anaphor with the accusative postposition o, and (iv) topic-object anaphor with the topic postposition wa. A self-paced sentence-by-sentence reading experiment was conducted using two-sentence discourse items followed by comprehension questions, aiming to examine which type of anaphor would trigger a faster realization of the anaphor-antecedent relationship. The discourse items included antecedents in the first sentence and anaphors in the second sentences, and the comprehension questions asked about the antecedents in the first sentences. Results showed that the comprehension questions for the discourses that included topic anaphors (topic-subject-wa and topic-object-wa) were responded to faster than those for the discourses that included non-topic anaphors (subject-ga and scrambled object-o). The results indicate that anaphors’ topic-hood given by wa facilitates the realization of antecedents.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Shinichi SHOJI, Mie University

Assistant professor

Organization for the development of higher educaiton and regional human resources

Mie University

References

Ariel, M. (1990). Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. New York: Routledge.

Chafe, W. (1987). Cognitive constraints on information flow. In R. Tomlin (Ed.), Coherence and grounding (pp. 21-52) Amserdam: John Benjamins.

Gernsbacher, M. A. (1989). Mechanisms that improve referential access. Cognition, 32(2), 99-156. Retrieved from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4467536/

Gordon, P. C., Grosz, B. J. & Gilliom, L. A. (1993). Pronouns, names, and the centering of attention in discourse. Cognitive Science, 17, 311-347.

Gordon, P. C., & Hendrick, R. (1998). The representation and processing of coreference in discourse. Cognitive Science, 22, 389-424.

Gundel, J. K. (1988). The role of topic and comment in linguistic theory. New York: Garland Publishing.

Gundel, J. K., Hedberg, N., & Zacharski, R. (1993). Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69, 274-307.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1967). Notes on transitivity and theme in English. Journal of Linguistics, 19, 377-417.

Haviland, S. E., & Clark, H. H. (1974). What’s new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 512-521.

Kuno, S. (1973). The structure of Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Martin, S. (1975). A reference grammar of Japanese. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Nakayama, M. (1990). Accessibility to the antecedents in Japanese sentence comprehension. Unpublished manuscript.

Nishimura, M. (1989). The topic-comment construction in Japanese-English code-switching. World Englishes, 8, 365–377.

Prince, E. F. (1978). On the function of existential presupposition in discourse. Papers from the Fourteenth Regional Meeting, Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistics Society.

Downloads

Published

28.06.2017

How to Cite

SHOJI, S. (2017). Understanding Reference: Morphological Marking in Japanese. Acta Linguistica Asiatica, 7(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.4312/ala.7.1.9-21

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 1 (2017)

Section

Research articles

License

Copyright (c) 2017 Shinichi Shoji

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitting article, which will be published online in journal Acta Linguistica Asiatica by Ljubljana University Press, Faculty of Arts (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, Aškerčeva 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). Author’s name will be evident in the article in journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in hands of the publisher.
  2. Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
  3. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.