Comparative Analysis of Coronavirus Metaphoric Representation in Chinese and Russian Online Media

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4312/ala.11.2.51-63

Keywords:

coronavirus, WAR metaphor, media discourse, metaphorical model, discourse metaphor, Chinese media

Abstract

This article aims at comparing the coronavirus metaphorical image in the online media of China and the Russia. Metaphor is viewed as a cognitive frame within the discourse. The study was conducted on 750 and 1000 headlines and leads of news reports about the coronavirus for the Chinese and Russian language. The results show that the virus image is based on similar metaphorical models, but the quantitative analysis of metaphors and metaphorical entailments indicate significant differences in the virus image that media creates. The coronavirus image in the PRC media mainly represents as an enemy which should be fought, and can be defeated, what helps to cool down public opinion. The Russian media discourse treats the coronavirus as a surprise enemy that is dangerous, and it is not clear “how it can be won”.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anthony, L. (2013). A critical look at software tools in corpus linguistics. Linguistic Research, 30(2), 141–161. DOI:10.17250/khisli.30.2.201308.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17250/khisli.30.2.201308.001

Camus, J. (2009). Metaphors of cancer in scientific popularization articles in the British press. Discourse Studies, 11(4), 465–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445609105220 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445609105220

Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan Book Company. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000612 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000612

Deignan, A. (2015). MIP, the corpus and dictionaries: What makes for the best metaphor analysis? Metaphor and the Social World, 5(1), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.5.1.09dei DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.5.1.09dei

Hart, C. (2011). Force-Interactive Patterns in Immigration Discourse: A Cognitive Linguistic Approach to CDA. Discourse and Society, 22(3), 269–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926510395440 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926510395440

Hart, C., & Lukes, D. (2007). Cognitive Linguistics in Critical Discourse Analysis: Application and Theory. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Hülsse, R. (2003). Sprache ist mehr als Argumentation. Zur wirklichkeitskonstituierenden Rolle von Metaphern. Zeitschrift für Int. Beziehungen, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.2307/40843931 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2003-2-211

Kalinin, O. I. (2020). Discoursive metaphor of coronavirus in PRC media. MSLU Vestnik. Humanitarian Studies, 8(837), 26-37. (In Russ.)

Kalinin, O. I. (2018). Metaphorical image of Chinese People's Liberation Army in Chinese Mass Media. Political Linguistics Journal, 6(72), 55-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26170/pl18-06-07

https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/metaforicheskiy-obraz-noak-v-smi-knr (In Russ)

Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.43-1393 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614408

Kövecses, Z. (2016). Conceptual metaphor theor. Routledge Handook of Metaphor Language, 13–27. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315672953 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315672953

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Larson, B., Nerlich, B., & Wallis, P. (2005). Metaphors and biorisks: The war on infectious diseases and invasive species. Science Communication, 26(3), 243–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547004273019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547004273019

Li, W. (2016). Rethinking Critical Metaphor Analysis. International Journal of English Linguistics, 6(2), 92. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v6n2p92 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v6n2p92

Popova, Z. D., & Sternin, I. A. (2007). Language and National World . Voronezh: Istoki (In Russ)

Sandahl, C. (2001). Performing metaphors: AIDS, disability, and technology. Contemporary Theatre Review: The Performance of Disability Special Issue, 11, 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/10486800108568638 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10486800108568638

Simpson, P., Mayr, A., & Statham, S. (2018). Critical Metaphor Analysis. Language and Power. Second edition, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon; New York, Routledge, 229–236. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429468896-47 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429468896-47

Trčková, D. (2015). Representations of Ebola and its victims in liberal American newspapers. Topics in Linguistics, 16(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.2478/topling-2015-0009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/topling-2015-0009

Walter, J., & Helmig, J. (2005). Metaphors as Agents of Signification. Towards a Discursive Analyses of metaphors. ECPR Granada Workshop Metaphors in Political Science. https://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/dfffad52-3887-48f3-acf3-d6c82c38c7b4.pdf

Washer, P. (2004). Representations of SARS in the British newspapers. Social Science & Medicine, 59(12), 2561–2571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.03.038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.03.038

Weiss, G., & Wodak, R. (2003). Critical discourse analysis: Theory and interdisciplinarity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230514560

Wodak, R., Meyer, M. (2009). Methods of critical discourse analysis. 2nd ed. London: Sage.

Wodak, R. (2006). Mediation between discourse and society: assessing cognitive approaches in CDA. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 179-190, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059566 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059566

Zinken, J., Hellsten, I., & Nerlich, B. (2008). Discourse metaphors. Discourse. 243-256. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288909625_Discourse_metaphors

Downloads

Published

30. 07. 2021

Issue

Section

Research articles

How to Cite

Kalinin, O. (2021). Comparative Analysis of Coronavirus Metaphoric Representation in Chinese and Russian Online Media. Acta Linguistica Asiatica, 11(2), 51-63. https://doi.org/10.4312/ala.11.2.51-63