Nevroznanost v raziskovalni umetnosti
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4312/ars.19.1.87-105Ključne besede:
raziskovalna umetnost, instrumentalna umetnost, nevroznanost, kognitivna znanost, umetna inteligencaPovzetek
Raziskovalne umetniške prakse konceptualno in tehnološko posegajo na različna področja znanosti in humanistike, pri čemer proces raziskovanja utemeljujejo v interdisciplinarnih metodologijah, katerih namen je ustvarjanje umetniškega dela, in ne oblikovanje znanstvene teorije. Besedilo uvodoma oriše razmerje med teorijo in prakso ter metodološke posebnosti umetniškega raziskovanja glede na raziskave v znanosti. V nadaljevanju osvetli metode ter konceptualne in kontekstualne problematike instrumentalne raziskovalne umetnosti ter poda sistematizacijo umetniških praks, ki v določenih fazah ustvarjanja vključujejo nevroznanost in nevrotehnologije. Analiza primerov izbranih umetniških del temelji na delitvi umetniških pristopov, ki uporabljajo različne nevroraziskovalne tehnologije – funkcijsko magnetno resonanco, merjenje možganskih valov, mobilno sledenje očesnim gibom – v interaktivnih delih (afektivni vidik) ter radiološke vizualizacije možganov za ustvarjanje asociacij in poetičnih metafor (retorični in metaforični vidik) ali raziskujejo potenciale nevromorfnih in senzornih tehnologij na področju uporabe generativne umetne inteligence in robotske umetnosti (performativni vidik).
Metrike
Prenosi
Literatura
Balinisteanu, T., in Priest, K., (ur.), Neuroaesthetics – A Methods-Based Introduction. Cham 2024.
Barrett, E., in Bolt, B. (ur.), Practice as Research – Context, Method, Knowledge, London, New York 2007.
Berlot Pompe, U., Nevroumetnost, nevroestetika in vprašanje zavesti, v: Časopis za kritiko znanosti, domišljijo in novo antropologijo, let. XLIV/265, Ljubljana 2016, str. 39–52.
Berlot Pompe, U., Mimesis in umetnost v času nevromorfnih tehnologij, v: Vizualnost v času posthumanizma – Okoljska etika, ekofeminizem, kibernetika in digitalna humanistika v umetnosti in oblikovanju (ur. Berlot Pompe, U.), Ljubljana 2024, str. 60–72.
Berlot Pompe, U., Izkustvo digitalnih podob in nevromedialnost, v: Vizualna pismenost, Ljubljana 2024, str. 152–166.
Berlot Pompe, U., Interakcija z digitalnimi mediji, v: ČKZ, let. L, 2022/285, Ljubljana 2022, str. 13–32.
Berlot Pompe, U., Umetnost in intuitivno spoznanje: nevroestetska perspektiva, v: Kako in zakaj? Znanost in umetnost: različni plati iste radovednosti (ur. Anderluh, G., in drugi), Ljubljana 2023, str. 201–221.
Besser, S., in Lysen, F. (ur), Worlding the Brain: Neurocentrism, Cognition and the Challenge of the Arts and Humanities, Leiden, Boston 2023.
Bianchini, S., Towards Organogenesis – For an Instrumental Approach in Research in Art, v: Media-N Review, November 2015, dostopno na: http://median.newmediacaucus.org/research-creation-explorations/towards-organogenesis-for-an-instrumental-approach-in-research-in-art/ (10. 3. 2025).
Bianchini, S., in Verhagen, E., Practicable: From Participation to Interaction in Contemporary Art, Cambridge, 2016.
Biggs, M., in Karlsson, H., The Routledge Companion to Research in the Arts, New York, London 2010.
Borgdorff, H., The Debate on Research in the Arts, v: Dutch Journal of Music Theory, Volume 12, No. 1., 2007, str. 1–17.
Borgdorff, H., The Production of Knowledge in Artistic Research, v: The Routledge Companion to Research in the Arts (ur. Biggs, M., Karlsson, H.), London, New York 2010, str. 44–63.
Borgdorff, H., Peters, P., in Pinch, T. (ur.), Dialogues Between Artistic Research and Science and Technology Studies, New York, London 2020.
Born, G., in Barry, A., Art-Science: From Public Understanding to Public Experiment. Journal of Cultural Economy, 3(1), 2010, str. 103–119. Dostopno na: https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:5e1b9d01-62ef-432e-8f78-7aac5225a6a8/download_file?safe_filename=Born%2Band%2BBarry%2BArt-Science%2BJCE%2B2010.pdf&file_format=application%2Fpdf&type_of_work=Journal+article (1. 3. 2025).
Busch, K., Artistic Research and the Poetics of Knowledge, Art & Research: A Journal of Ideas, Contexts and Methods, Volume 2. No. 2. Spring, 2009.
Chatterjee, A., in Cardilo, E. (ur.), Brain, Beauty, and Art – Essays Bringing Neuroaesthetics into Focus, Oxford 2021.
Choudhury, S., in Slaby, J. (ur.), Critical Neuroscience – A Handbook of the Social and Cultural Contexts of Neuroscience, Chichester, Oxford 2012.
Di Dio, C., in Gallese, V., Moving Toward Emotions in the Eesthetic experience, v: Brain, Beauty, and Art – Essays Bringing Neuroaesthetics into Focus (ur. Chatterjee, A., Cardilo, E.), Oxford 2021, str. 22–26.
Di Dio, C., Gallese, V., in dr. (2023): Art Made by Artificial Intelligence: The Effect of Authorship on Aesthetic Judgments. August 17, 2023. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/aca0000602 (15. 9. 2023).
Fingerhut, J., Enacting Media – An Embodied Account of Enculturation Between Neuromediality and New Cognitive Media Theory, Berlin. 2021. Dostopno na: https://www.academia.edu/44608505/Enacting_Media_An_Embodied_Account_of_Enculturation_Between_Neuromediality_and_New_Cognitive_Media_Theory (10. 3. 2025).
Fingerhut, J., The Mediated Brain – A Case Study on Experience, v: Worlding the Brain: Neurocentrism, Cognition and the Challenge of the Arts and Humanities (ur. Besser, S., Lysen, F.), Leiden, Boston 2023.
Gallagher, S., Embodied and Enactive Approaches to Cognition, Cambridge 2023.
Gallese, V., The Aesthetic World In The Digital Era. A Call To Arms For Experimental Aesthetics. Reti, saperi, linguaggi 1/2020 a. 9 (17), 2020, str. 55–84. Dostopno na: https://www.academia.edu/43708296/THE_AESTHETIC_WORLD_IN_THE_DIGITAL_ERA_A_CALL_TO_ARMS_FOR_EXPERIMENTAL_AESTHETICS (10. 3. 2025).
Hannula, M., Suoranta, J., in Vadén, T. Artistic Research Methodology – Narrative, Power and the Public, Bern 2014.
Jones, C. A., in Galison, P., Picturing Science, Producing Art, London, New York 2014.
Jones, C. A., Experience, v: Autorität des Wissens Kunst- und Wissenschaftsgeschichte im Dialog (ur. Heiden, A., Zschocke, N.), Zürich 2012, str. 167–191.
Klein, J., What is Artistic Research, Berlin 2010.
Lysen, F., Brainmedia – One Hundred Years of Performing Live Brains, 1920–2020, New York, London 2022.
Lysen, F., Kissing and Staring, v: Dialogues Between Artistic Research and Science and Technology Studies (ur. Borgdorff, H., Peters, P., Pinch, T.), New York, London 2020.
Macleod, K., in Holdridge, L. (ur.), Thinking Through Art – Reflections on Art as Research, London, New York 2005.
Malabou, C., Plasticity – The Promise of Explosion, Edinburgh 2022.
Mateus-Berr, R., in Jochum, R., Teaching Artistic Research – Conversations Across Cultures Dunaj 2020.
Matusall, S., Kaufmann, I. M., in Christen, M., The Emergence of Social Neuroscience, v: J. The Oxford Handbook of Social Neuroscience (ur. Decety, J., Cacioppo, J. T.), Oxford 2011, str. 9–27.
Newen, A., De Bruin, L., in Gallagher, S., The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition, Oxford 2018.
Northoff, G., The Spontaneous Brain from the Mind-Body to the World-Brain Problem, Cambridge, London 2018.
Skov, M., Nadal, M. (ur.), The Routledge International Handbook of Neuroaesthetics, London, New York 2022.
Slaby, J., in Gallagher, S., Critical Neuroscience and Socially Extended Minds, v: Theory, Culture and Society, 32(1), 2014, str. 33–59.
Starr, G. G., Feeling Beauty – The Neuroscience of Aesthetic Experience, Cambridge, London 2013.
Sullivan, G., Art Practice as Research – Inquiry in the Visual Arts, London 2005.
Thornton, D. J., Brain Culture – Neuroscience and Popular Media, New Brunswick, New Jersey, London 2011.
Wilson, S., Information Arts – Intersections of Art, Science, and Technology, Cambridge, London 2001.
Wilson, S., Art + Science Now, London 2010.
Young, A., Empathic Cruelty and the Origin of the Social Brain, v: Critical Neuroscience – A Handbook of the Social and Cultural Contexts of Neuroscience (ur. Choudhury, S., Slaby, S.) Chichester, Oxford 2012, str. 158–176.
Prenosi
Objavljeno
Številka
Rubrika
Licenca
Avtorske pravice (c) 2025 Uršula Berlot Pompe
To delo je licencirano pod Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva-Deljenje pod enakimi pogoji 4.0 mednarodno licenco.
Kako citirati
