THE CONCEPT OF HARMONY IN CONTEMPORARY P.R. CHINA AND IN MODERN CONFUCIANISM

The present article deals with the idea of the “harmonious society”, which is at the core of contemporary social ideologies in the P. R. China. This concept is examined from three perspectives: the official state interpretations of the concept of harmony (he or hexie), and the classical and Modern Confucian elucidations. The writer concludes that official interpretations from the P.R. China mainly follow Xunzi’s classical elaboration of this concept, which is in the legalist tradition and implies autocratic elements, whereas Taiwanese Modern Confucian interpretations generally elaborate the Mencian, i.e. the more egalitarian and democratic stream of classical Confucian thought.

Confucius and his thought were seen as a prototype of reactionary ideology and traditionalism, although it was mainly directed against Lin Biao and the moderate politician, Zhou Enlai (Motoh 2009, 91).
Less than two decades later, however, and to the complete surprise of many experts in Chinese studies, such criticism was completely reversed.As Helena Motoh (ibid) points out, one of the first indications of this turnabout was Gu Mu's official address on the occasion of the 2540 th anniversary of Confucius' birth.
In his speech, Gu Mu, who was one of the chief ideologues of Chinese modernization, indicated the importance of a "correct" (or rectified) relation to traditional national culture and urged a revival of the positive elements of Confucian thought within the framework of a synthesis with Western ideas.At the same time, he stressed that in this synthesis the Chinese tradition should predominate over the Western one.
This "official" turning towards Confucianism manifested itself in changes in official Party language, the founding of numerous departments and chairs of "national studies 4 " and the establishment of a network of "Confucian institutes" throughout the world (ibid).However, Confucianism was also re-discovered by many intellectuals who hoped to find in it a useful tool for re-evaluating (traditional) social practices, thereby contributing to the solution of the many socio-political problems facing contemporary China.
In recent years, Confucian teachings have been valued primarily in terms of their possible contribution to the idea of a "harmonious society".
The need for a policy rethink spurred Hu's 'harmonious society/world' idea.China now needs to adjust its attitude: a more proactive role is now necessary if the country is to shape its own destiny, both internally and externally.'Scientific development' (kexue fazhanguan) and 'harmonious society' serve to provide Hu's domestic audience with new developmental objectives; 'harmonious world' sends the signal that China is now moving into a new stage of development.This new mentality and approach-China finally 'going out'-is applicable to both China's domestic and foreign policies, three decades into its 'open door' policy (Zhen and Tok 2007, 2).

Harmony and legislation
Although in the reports of the 17 th Communist Party Congress, the concept of the harmonious society would be overshadowed somewhat by the slogan of "scientific development," the "construction of a harmonious society" (hexie shehui jianshe) still represents one of the main principles of the continental 4Guo xue 國學.In contemporary China, we can also cite the so-called "National studies fever" (Guo xue re 國學熱).
government, and was even applied in the new reform of Chinese legislation.This link between harmony and law was often the focus of Chinese academic articles dealing with the legal implications of the (planned) harmonious society: In establishing its legal and judicial system, the ancient Chinese society in which Confucian culture predominated laid stress upon the concepts of "applying rituality, respect for harmony and consideration of the methods of ancient rulers".In its method of following "the middle way", Confucianism strove for the consolidation for these concepts.The "respect for harmony" represents the core of ancient Chinese culture and, at the same time, the basic value tendency on which rests the classical Chinese idea of a legal system.Nowadays, we have re-established this idea of "constructing harmonious society" and emphasized the content of the notion "harmony"… Thus, the foundation of modern societies is law, which is based upon regulations, the wisdom of the people, equality and justice.A harmonious society lays stress upon peace and order, sincerity, friendship, love and also upon a coherent development.It strives for the unification of man and nature and for a healthy sustainable development.Thus, if we want to establish a harmonious society, we must first establish the rule of law5 (Zhou Jiayi 2010, 285).
As Leila Choukrone and Antoine Garapon point out, in this context the concept of harmony is seen primarily as an instrument of social discipline, a view which comes to the forefront in discussions on the linkage between harmony and law: This theoretical framework turns law into a disciplinary principle dedicated to society's moral construction.If law is seen as an instrument for legitimizing power, it remains implicitly but primarily subordinate to the regime's durability… Thus, at the current juncture, "harmony" is also essential for a Party concerned over retaining its grip on the country (Choukrone and Garapon 2007, 3).This position was already made explicit in an article by Xiao Zhuoji, a professor of the School of Economics of Peking University and vice-chairman of the Social and Legal Affairs Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, whose comments on the new political direction appeared in the English edition of the official China Daily soon after Hu Jintao's announcement of the new "harmonious path": »In addition, we will crack down on various social ills, which are a poisonous tumour in a harmonious society and must be eliminated« (Xiao Zhuoji 2007: 2).
serves as an ideological support for a legal model which is used as a disciplinary and moral tool for preserving the present regime, then harmony (as an ostensibly essential aspect of Confucian teachings) also serves as a symbol for Confucius, seen as a thinker who propounded a "proper" morality that manifested itself in the subordination of individuals to "higher" social goals and in the unconditional obedience to superiors.

The concept of harmony in original Confucianism, later developments by Mengzi and Xunzi
Although official publications dedicated to promoting the idea of a harmonious society often indicate Confucius and/or Confucianism as the source of this concept, at first glance the connotations indicated above do not seem to derive from the original Confucian canon, but from the discourses of the post-Confucian Legalist school of thought.However, we should recall that for Dong Zhongshu, the Han scholar and reformer who elaborated the later traditional Confucian state doctrine, the normative function of "propriety" (zheng 正), which manifests itself through the implementation of rituals (li 禮), provided a basic means (together with the hierarchical social structure) for integrating legalist elements into the ideal framework of original Confucianism.In order to understand the implications of this position, let us briefly examine the semantic connotations of the concept of harmony (or harmonization) in the context of the most relevant classical texts6 .
In the Analects (Lun yu 論語), Confucius makes a radical distinction between sameness (in the sense of uniformity, tong 同), and harmony or harmonization (he 和), and criticizes the former in the following terms: The nobleman creates harmony, not sameness.Ordinary men, on the contrary, are all the same and cannot create harmony7 .(Kong Fuzi 2012, Zi lu 23) The idea that diversity is a condition of harmony (Motoh 2009, 99) can also be found in the Confucian classics The Annales of Spring and Autumn (Chun qiu lu 春秋錄): If the ruler approves something, everyone approves it.And if he is against something, everyone is against it.This is like adding water to water.Who would like to eat (such a watery soup)?This is like all instruments (in an orchestra) playing the same musical tune.Who would like to listen to such music? 8(Kong Fuzi 2012b, Shao gong ershi nian 1) Underlying this view is the assumption that social harmony is merely a projection or metaphor for the mutual coherence of tones that forms the basis of any good music.Rituals, of which it is part, also have a regulatory function.Thus, any kind of harmony that was not in accordance with rituals was deemed inappropriate by the Confucians and could not represent a positive value: To know the harmonious coherence and still create harmony without regulating it by the rules of propriety, this likewise should not be done. 9(Kongzi 2012a: Xue er 12) Here, we find the regulatory or normative function of the central Confucian concept li.Although music is an important part of Confucian ritual, not every kind of music is appropriate for cultivated people.The function of the ritual fusion of nature and culture, men and nature, individuals and society can only be fulfilled by "proper", or "sublime" music (ya yue 10 ).Given the similarity with the Confucian understanding of harmony11 , it cannot be claimed that the disciplinary function of harmony -in a broader sensederives exclusively from legalist discourses.
As is well known, the interpretations of the original teachings of Confucius by his most important followers, Mengzi and Xunzi, differed in their specific approach towards innate human qualities.This naturally influenced their divergent views on the relation between individuals and society, as well as their interpretation of social harmony.We should bear in mind that Xunzi also provided the interpretative foundation of Dong Zhongshu's reformist thought, which implied various legalistic elements.On the other hand, Neo-Confucian philosophy mainly followed the Mencian interpretations of the original Confucian teachings, and provided a basis for the later Modern Confucian theorists.In the framework of the present study, it is worth noting that while the concept of harmony often appears in the works of the "legalist" Xunzi, it is scarcely mentioned by the "humanistic"12 Mengzi, who always understood the concept he in the sense of mutual human harmony and coherence: Opportunities of time provided by Heaven are not equal to advantages of situation provided by the Earth, and advantages of situation arising from the Earth are not equal to the union arising from the harmony between people13 .(Mengzi 2012, Gongsun Chou III/10).
8君所謂可，據亦曰可，君所謂否，據亦曰否，若以水濟水，誰能食之，若琴瑟之專壹，誰能聽之. 9知和而和，不以禮節之，亦不可行也.10 雅樂 Mengzi explains this view with the following example, in which he analyses the reasons for a city's decline: The city walls were distinguished for their height, and its moats were deep enough.Its arms were distinguished for their strength and sharpness, and the stores of rice and grain were large enough.Yet it was given up and abandoned.This is because advantages of situation provided by the Earth are not equal to the union arising from the harmony between people 14 .(ibid) Such a harmonious coherence is conditioned by adaptation, for he also applied the term he with this connotation: Hui of Liu Xia could adapt harmoniously to the sages 15 .(ibid.Wang zhang II/10).
In his understanding of the concept he, Xunzi adhered to its original meaning, which is linked to musical harmony: Rituality is grounded in the respect of culture, and music in harmony 16 .(Xunzi 2011, Quan xue 12) Further, he often explicitly connects the harmonious compliance among people with the concept of regularity (jie) 17 .
If we want our government to function well, our efforts, will and thoughts have to follow rituality.If not, then chaos will prevail and people will suffer.Our food, clothes, homes and actions must all follow rituality, because only in this way can harmony be achieved.Otherwise, we will experience unhappiness and illness 18. (ibid, Xiu shen 2) According to Xunzi, this regularity which was meant to order human relations in a harmonious society, was based upon the regular order of Nature.In fact, it manifested itself in the orderly sequence of the four seasons: To act in accordance with Heaven/Nature means that there is no drought on the heights and no floods in the lowlands.Winter and summer follow each other with an orderly, harmonious constancy and the crops mature in their proper time 19 .(Xunzi 2011, Xiu shen 3) This orderly harmony must be strengthened by culture (ibid, Ru xiao 1)20.Xunzi thus distinguishes between "good" and "bad" harmony: 14城非不高也，池非不深也，兵革非不堅利也，米粟非不多也；委而去之，是地利不如人和也.15柳下惠，聖之和者也.16禮之敬文也，樂之中和也.17 The contemporary meaning of the term jie 節 refers to festivals or celebrations.Originally, it meant respect for proper social rituals.Even the modern compound that denotes a feast, implies the word for ritual (lijie 禮節).The regulative function of the word jie is also evident in its classical connotation of 'saving'.
When harmony among people is established by the means of goodness, everything will flow smoothly.If somebody wants to establish harmony by means of evil, he is nothing but an opportunist21.(ibid, Rongru 11) Hence, "good" harmony is based on a regulative order of nature, which also manifests itself in a proper hierarchic structure of society.Such connotations, which are already rather legalistic, are expressed explicitly in the following passage, in which this Confucian philosopher links an orderly social hierarchy to the concept of unification.This concept is, of course, fundamental to the functioning of a centralist state, while also clearly contradicting Confucius who, as we noted above, advocated diversity: It is therefore reasonable to create harmony by the means of divisions.(Such) harmony allows unification and unification allows superiority.In this way, the farthest borders (of the state) can be reached and our enemies can be defeated 22 .(ibid, Wang zhi 19) But Xunzi goes even further, and links the creation of harmony to the idea of punishment: With the establishment of forms of punishment, the governing [of society] will become balanced and people will live in harmony 23 .(ibid, Wang zhi 26) The disciplinary connotation that prevailed in the understanding and propagation of a "harmonious society" in China under Hu Jintao, thus derives directly from Xunzi's interpretations of this notion.They can thus can be regarded as Confucian, but in terms of their fundamental aims they derive from elaborations of the original Confucian teachings which were functional to the integration of despotic elements into the new state doctrine formulated in the Han period.

Modern Confucian interpretations
In the context of the present study, it is of particular interest to determine whether (and to what degree) the modern concept of a "harmonious society", which represents an important element of current ideologies and is often denoted as a Confucian heritage, may also be linked to the theoretical conclusions of Modern Confucianism.
As noted, Modern Confucians have generally followed a Neo-Confucian philosophy based upon Mengzi's, rather than Xunzi's development of the original teachings.Xunzi was thus often viewed as something of a heretic who did not profess or elaborate a "proper" Confucianism in his own discourses.
Xiong Shili, who taught many of the representatives of the second generation of Modern Confucianism, identifies what he considers the fundamental failing in Xunzi : Confucianism upholds original human goodness, that is, the shining aspect of human nature.Orthodox Confucianism, from Mencius to Wang Yangming, insists that there is original benevolence in human nature (with the exception of Xunzi).Xiong concludes that Xunzi fails to reach the essence of Confucianism (Yu Jiuyuan 2002, 131).
In order to better understand this basic division, we will briefly examine the meaning and interpretations of the concept of harmony in the context of the second generation of Modern Confucianism.The main representatives of this generation are Mou Zongsan, Xu Fuguan, Tang Junyi and Fang Dongmei.Although the present study is devoted to the specific theoretical concepts relating to modernization (and it is in this context that these philosophers will be discussed below), given their relevance to our chosen topic, we will provide a brief survey of their views on the legitimization of Confucianism and harmony.
One of Xiong Shili's most gifted students was Mou Zongsan, who is generally regarded, especially in philosophical terms, as the leading representative of the second generation of Modern Confucians.With respect to the legitimacy of Confucian teachings and the definition of a "proper" Confucianism, Mou agrees with his teacher Xiong Shili, in terms of the criteria of autonomous ethics and the unity of reason and emotions.Consequently, only Confucius, Mengzi and the authors or commentators of the classical works, The Doctrine of the Mean (Zhong yong) and The Book of Changes (Yi jing) can be considered as "legitimate" heirs to pre-Qin Confucianism.Xunzi instead belongs to a lateral (i.e.not completely legitimate) current, due to his advocacy of the so-called "ethics of heteronomy" (Lee 2001, 73).
While Mou does not give much attention to the question of harmony, at least explicitly, some clues to harmonious living in society can be found in his work, On Summum Bonum (Yuan shan lun), in which he attempts to explain the method of the harmonization (or unification) of happiness and goodness.In this study, he also briefly considers the interpretation of the original Confucian phrase "the harmony of balance" (Zhong he); a phrase which, however, has nothing to do with the social connotations of harmony that are at the heart of presentday continental ideologies.On the contrary, this phrase refers to the ideal foundations of harmony, which are grounded in the completeness of the individual (and integral) moral Self.
The existence of my individual life is a completed fact, but it still implies possibilities of improvement.Therefore, it is not a kind of fixed or determined existence.This existence is, according to the Buddhists, a non-defined existence of everything that exists.Everything that exists is in this completed fact of existence, but, at the same time, this existence is un-defined (i.e. it is not of a fixed, determined nature).All existence is permeated by reason and grows out from it.The Doctrine of the Mean24 refers to this, for it says: "When the harmony of balance is achieved, Heaven and Earth are in their proper places and everything that exists develops25.(Mou Zongsan 1985, 306).
In his discussion of the Doctrine of the Mean (Zhong yong), Xu Fuguan likewise deals with this concept (i.e. the harmony of balance, zhong he), which he views as a notion that: "refers to the 'nature' that unifies the internal and the beyond and to the harmonizing function of the nature that consummates both the self and the things around (it).The internal aspect is what consummates the self, and the beyond is what consummates the things around."(Ni 2002, 287) Xu explains this notion as follows: Here, the notion "balance (zhong)" 26 does not only refer to a foundation of some external balance, but rather to a common basis for both "balance" (zhong) and "one's own way".In the third commentary of Guang Ya we can read: "One's own way is harmony".This means that harmony can be equated to one's own way.The expression "harmony" which forms a part of the compound "harmony of balance" (zhong he), is not only an effect of the "own way", but a joint effect of balance and the own way.The balance that appears in the expression "harmony of balance", acts outwards as the way of the mean (or the middle way), but on a higher level it connects the innate qualities of each individual with their life.Therefore, it can be denoted as the "great foundation".The notion "harmony", which appears in the phrase "harmony of balance", is an effect of the middle way (or the own way of balance).The middle way (or the own way of balance) therefore implies the actual effect (or substantial impact) of "harmony" and thus is capable of reaching everything under heaven… Hence, we can say, that the concept of harmony refers to something which describes "the effect of that which is called dao".At the same time, this concept expresses the very entity which makes the inherent connection with the middle way (or the own way of balance) possible 27.(Xu Fuguan 2005, 127)  The harmony of balance is thus the most basic foundation of each individual, which enables them to achieve/maintain a harmonious co-existence with other individuals and society as a whole.As we shall see, in Modern Confucian philosophy the moral Self represents both the foundation of each individual and the core of the universal reason.This is naturally preconditioned by the complementarity of the relation between the individual and their natural/social environment.This means that social harmony is necessarily linked to the harmonious inwardness of the individual.
Given that, in the Modern Confucian view, the universe (or all that exists) is permeated with the virtue of goodness, both the phenomenal forms of reality, as well as its substantial nucleus that manifests itself in the idea of the "things as such" (noumenon) are axiological notions.The harmony of human existence is thus strictly bound with moral premises.For Xu Fuguan, these values are closely linked to the aesthetics of perceiving beauty, which is one of the fundamental functions or effects of harmony.Xu argues that this is why music was considered of paramount importance in the ideal framework of original Confucianism.
A profound musical sensation enables us to simultaneously project its harmony into the sphere of social reality: In Confucianism, balance (zhong) and harmony were the central aesthetic criteria of music.Behind balance and harmony there is the meaning of goodness; thus, they can move human hearts and awaken goodness in them.28(Xu Fuguan 2001, 14).
In the field of concrete social politics, Xu Fuguan envisioned a system that would enable society to achieve "rational harmony" on the basis of a reasonable competition.A co-existence that was not merely a question of the individual should be premised on the independence of each individual, with the collective rights of the community grounded in individual rights (Ni 2002, 296 -297).
However, when the maturity of the people and the other conditions are sufficiently present so that people who enjoy political rights can live together harmoniously, the system of rights may become less important or even unnecessary.As Chenyang Li suggests, between well-related family members, "it is meaningless or even destructive to talk about their rights against one another".Yet between the stage that relies on sage rulers and the stage at which harmony prevails, Confucianism must provide room for something less ideal.As Shu-hsien Liu says, in the current historical situation "we have to negate the tradition in order to reconfirm the ideal of the tradition« (ibid, 298).
Xu Fuguan was thus advocating a harmony of human communities based upon the uniqueness and irreproducibility of each individual.
In the chapter "Twenty years of Duke Zhao", in Zuo's Commentary on the Spring and Autumn Annals, Yanzi says: "Harmony is like a stew".A stew contains various kinds of tastes that blend together into a delicious unity.Therefore, "harmony" is composed of many different combinations of particular qualities.In harmony, none of these particular qualities will lose its uniqueness: instead, they blend harmoniously with one another.29(Xu Fuguan 2005, 127) The morality offered to the individual by Tang Junyi, is not based on either the uniqueness of their individual existence (as in Xu Fuguan's political philosophy), nor on the autonomous freedom of the moral Self and its infinite mind (as in Mou Zongsan).Tang's idea of morality is much more directly rooted in the individual sense of the innate responsibility whichsimilarly to the neo-Confucian concept of "innate knowledge" /liang zhi/ -can guide human beings through the opaque thickets of all the ethical dilemmas and doubts they will encounter during their actual lives.But the individual can contribute to the higher goal of social harmony only if they obey this inner gnomen of responsibility: You need not ask what you should do, because you alone know what is to be done.However, sometimes you might sense the possibility of acting in more than one way.You might even feel that these different possibilities are in contradiction with one another.You might not know immediately which one to choose, or how to unify them in order to achieve a higher level of harmony… And yet all these questions must be resolved exclusively by you, for you alone can recognize the reason for acting in one specific way30.(Tang Junyi 1985, 53-54) However, this form of responsibility does not condition individual interests based on those of society (or groups).A morally conscious person will always act in accordance with their responsibility, regardless of their own interests, or the interests of the broader social community.
A human being is not a thing; a human being is a goal in and of itself.This means that individuals are not tools of society, nor tools of the state.And the people of today are not tools for the people of tomorrow… But if we say that people are not tools of society, this does not mean that we are outside of it, and individuals should not look upon society and the state as the means for achieving their own interests… I believe that the conflict between individuals and society can only be solved by educating people to develop to the utmost their innate moral nature 31 .(Tang Junyi 2000, 61-62) This is clearly not about obedience to external authorities.As his choice of language indicates, Tang remains loyal to the fundamental principles of Chinese ethics, which consciously strives to transcend the