Critique of “Judgment” in Gongsun Long’s “Zhiwu lun”

A Comparative Reading in the Light of Hölderlin’s “Judgment and Being”

Authors

  • SHE Shiqin Xiamen University, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2022.10.2.269-298

Keywords:

Gongsun Long, the Heidelberg School, Hölderlin, critique of judgment, pre-reflectivity

Abstract

This paper has attempted to characterize “Zhiwu lun” as the presentation of the incapacity of object-oriented knowledge to represent the realm of “things”, highlighting Gongsun Long’s epistemological and ontological value beyond a logical one. This paper proposes that only based upon this assumption does “Zhiwu lun” allow a thorough interpretation of “Mingshi lun”, whereby the intuitive function of “names” provides a better solution to the cognitive limits imposed by object-oriented (self-)consciousness. Methodologically, this paper mainly considers the Heidelberg School’s interpretation of Hölderlin’s critique of judgment in “Judgment and Being” to be both a complementary justification and reconstruction of the implicit structures of Gongsun Long’s view. This paper has presupposed the interpretation of Gongsun Long’s key concept of 指 as “judgment” in Hölderlin’s sense, in contrast to “things” (物) and “name” (名), then verified this hypothesis, as well as the relationships amongst these translations, by a close textual analysis and new translation of “Zhiwu lun”.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cheng, Chung-ying, and Richard H. Swain. 1970. “Logic and Ontology in the Chih Wu Lun of Kung-sun Lung Tzu.” Philosophy East and West 20 (2): 137–54.

Cheng, Chung-ying. 1983. “Kung-sun Lung: White Horse and Other Issues.” Philosophy East and West 33 (4): 341–54.

Csikszentmihalyi, Mark, and Michael Nylan. 2003. “Constructing Lineages and Inventing Traditions through Exemplary Figures in Early China.” T’oung Pao 89 (1/3): 59–99.

Frank, Manfred. 1989. Einführung in die frühromantische Ästhetik. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

———. 1997. “Unendliche Annäherung”. Die Anfänge der philosophischen Frühromantik. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

———. 2004. The Philosophical Foundations of Early German Romanticism. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.

Fraser, Chris. 2007. “Language and Ontology in Early Chinese Thought.” Philosophy East and West 57 (4): 420–56.

Fung, Yiu-ming, ed. 2020. Dao Companion to Chinese Philosophy of Logic. Springer.

Graham, A. C. 1986. “The Disputation of Kung-sun Lung as Argument about Whole and Part.” Philosophy East and West 36 (2): 89–106.

Hansen, Chad D. 1976. “Mass Nouns and ‘A White Horse Is Not a Horse’.” Philosophy East and West 26 (2): 189–209.

Henrich, Dieter. 1997. The Course of Remembrance. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.

———. 2004. Der Grund im Bewusstsein. Untersuchungen zu Hölderlin Denken (1794–1795). Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

———. 2008. Between Kant and Hegel: Lectures on German Idealism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

———. 2019. Dies ich, das viel besagt. Frankfurt a. M.: Vittorio Klostermann.

Hölderlin, Friedrich. 1988. Essays and Letters on Theory. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.

Indraccolo, Lisa. 2017. “The ‘White Horse is not Horse’ Debate.” Philosophy Compass 12 (10): e12434.

Johnston, Ian, and Wang Ping, trans. 2019. The Mingjia and Related Texts. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong Press.

Liu, Tisheng. 2020. “A New Interpretation of the Gōngsūn Lóngzǐ’s ‘Zhǐwù lùn’ (Discourse on Pointings and Things) and ‘Míngshí lùn’ (Discourse on Names and Actualities)”. In The Gongsun Longzi and Other Neglected Texts, edited by Rafael Suter, Lisa Indraccolo, and Wolfgang Behr, 241–88. Berlin. De Gruyter.

Mei, Y. P. 1953. “The Kung-sun Lung Tzu with a Translation into English.”. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 16 (3/4): 404–37.

Mou, Bo. 2007. “A double-Reference Account: Gongsun Long’s ‘White-Horse-not-Horse’ Thesis.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 34 (4): 493–513.

———. 2020. “Naming, Reference and Truth.” In Dao Companion to Chinese Philosophy of Logic, edited by Yiu-ming Fung, 33–70. Springer.

Pang, Pu 龐樸. 1974. Gong Sun Long Zi Yi Zhu 《公孫龍子譯註》 (A Commented Translation of the Gongsun Longzi). Shanghei: People’s Publisher of Shanghai.

Perleberg, Max, ed. 1952. The Works of Kung-Sun Lung-Tzu. Translated by Max Perleberg. Westpoint: Hyperion Press.

Reding, Jean-Paul. 2002. “Gongsun Long on What is Not: Steps toward the Deciphering of the Zhiwulun.” Philosophy East and West 52 (2): 190–206.

Rieman, Fred. 1977. “On Linguistic Skepticism in Wittgenstein and Kung-sun Lung.” Philosophy East and West 27 (2): 183–93.

———. 1980. “Kung-sun Lung, Designated Things, and Logic.” Philosophy East and West 30 (3): 305–19.

———. 1981. “Kung-sun, White Horses, and Logic.” Philosophy East and West 31 (4): 417–47.

She, Shiqin. 2016. “Du ‘tournant’ dans la compréhension du tragique chez Hölderlin.” Laval théologique et philosophique (LTP) 71/2: 267–84.

Suter, Rafael, Lisa Indraccolo, and Wolfgang Behr, eds. 2020. The Gongsun Longzi and Other Neglected Texts. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Thompson, Kirill Ole. 1995. “When a ‘White Horse’ Is Not a ‘Horse’.” Philosophy East and West 45 (4): 481–99.

Wang, Guan. 王琯. 1992. Gong Sun Long Zi Xuan Jie 《公孙龙子悬解》). (A Clarification of the Gongsun Longzi). Beijing: China Publishing House.

Zhang, Yijing. 2019. “Les catégories d’Aristote à l’épreuve du « sophiste » chinois Gongsun Long.” Revue Philosophique de Louvain 117 (1): 3–30.

Downloads

Published

09.05.2022

How to Cite

She, S. (2022). Critique of “Judgment” in Gongsun Long’s “Zhiwu lun”: A Comparative Reading in the Light of Hölderlin’s “Judgment and Being” . Asian Studies, 10(2), 269–298. https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2022.10.2.269-298