Martin Heidegger and Kitayama Junyū
Nothingness, Emptiness, and the Thing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2023.11.1.27-50Keywords:
emptiness, Heidegger, modern Japanese philosophy, nothingness, thingsAbstract
Heidegger’s early philosophical project was identified with a nihilistic philosophy of nothingness after the 1927 publication of Being and Time—with its depiction of the radical existential anxiety of being-towards-death—and his 1929 lecture “What is Metaphysics?”—with its analysis of the loss of all orientation and comportment in the face of an impersonal self-nihilating nothingness. Heidegger’s philosophy of nothingness would be contrasted in both Germany and Japan in the 1930s and 1940s with “Oriental nothingness” by authors such as Kitayama Junyū, a neglected Japanese philosopher active in Germany and an early interpreter of Heidegger and Nishida. In this contribution, I trace how Heidegger’s reflections on nothingness and emptiness (which are distinct yet intertwined expressions) become interculturally entangled with East Asian discourses in the early reception of his thought, particularly in Kitayama and the introduction of Nishida’s philosophy into Germany, and their significance in Heidegger’s “A Dialogue on Language”.
Downloads
References
Anders, Günther. 2001. Über Heidegger. München: Beck.
Anesaki, Masaharu. 1915. Buddhist Art in its Relation to Buddhist Ideals. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Ayer, A. J. 1934. “The Genesis of Metaphysics.” Analysis 1 (4): 55–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/1.4.55
Brightwell, Erin L. 2015. “Refracted Axis: Kitayama Jun’yū and Writing a German Japan.” Japan Forum 27 (4): 431–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09555803.2015.1073167
Buchner, Hartmut, ed. 1989. Japan und Heidegger. Sigmaringen: Thorbecke.
Carnap, Rudolf. 1931. “Überwindung der Metaphysik durch logische Analyse der Sprache.” Erkenntnis 2 (1): 219–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02028153
Davis, Bret W. 2013. “Heidegger and Asian Philosophy.” In The Bloomsbury Companion to Heidegger, edited by François Raffoul, and Eric S. Nelson, 459–71. London: Bloomsbury.
Gürster, Eugen. 1938. Die Zukunft der Freiheit. Zürich: Europa-Verlag.
Harich, Wolfgang. 2016. Frühe Schriften, volume 1: Neuaufbau im zerstörten Berlin. Marburg: Tectum Wissenschaftsverlag. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783828866126-1
Heidegger, Martin. 1975–ongoing. Gesamtausgabe, 102 volumes. Frankfurt: Klostermann.
———. 1971. On the Way to Language. Translated by Peter D. Hertz. New York: HarperCollins.
———. 1989. Überlieferte Sprache und Technische Sprache. St. Gallen: Erker.
———. 1998. Pathmarks. Translated by William McNeil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2002. Off the Beaten Track. Edited and translated by Julian Young, and Kenneth Haynes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2010. Country Path Conversations. Translated by Bret W. Davis. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Hilbert, David. 1931. “Die Grundlegung der elementaren Zahlenlehre.” Mathematische Annalen 104 (1): 485–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01457953
Hisamatsu, Shinichi. 1960. “The Characteristics of Oriental Nothingness.” Philosophical Studies of Japan 2: 65–97.
———. 2002. Zen Talks on the Record of Linji. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Imamichi, Tomonobu. 1958. “Das Seinsproblem in der Philosophie des Ostasiatischen Altertums.” Jahrbuch für Psychologie und Psychotherapie 6: 54–64.
———. 2004. In Search of Wisdom: One Philosopher’s Journey. Tokyo: International House of Japan.
Ives, Christopher. 2009. Imperial-Way Zen: Ichikawa Hakugen’s Critique and Lingering Questions for Buddhist Ethics. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21313/hawaii/9780824833312.001.0001
Kitayama, Junyū. 1934. Metaphysik des Buddhismus: Versuch einer philosophischen Interpretation der Lehre Vasubandhus und seiner Schule. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer.
———. 1940. “Genjō Kōan: Aus dem Zen-Text Shōbō genzō von Patriarch Dōgen.” Quellenstudien zur Religionsgeschichte 1: 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112433928-003
———. 1942. West-Östliche Begegnung: Japans Kultur und Tradition. Berlin: De Gruyter.
———. 1943a. Heiligung des Staates und Verklärung des Menschen: Buddhismus und Japan. Berlin: Limpert.
———. 1943b. “Die moderne Philosophie Japans: Ein Beitrag zum Verständnis der ‘Nishida-Philosophie.’” Kant-Studien 43 (1/2): 263–74.
———. 1944. Heroisches Ethos: Das Heldische in Japan. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Krauss, Oskar. 1931. “Über Alles und Nichts.” Philosophische Hefte 2: 140–46.
Krummel, John W. M. 2018. “On (the) Nothing: Heidegger and Nishida.” Continental Philosophy Review 51 (2): 239–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-017-9419-3
Kubota, Hiroshi. 2008. “Strategies in Representing ‘Japanese Religion’ During the National Socialist Period: The Cases of Kitayama Junyû and Wilhelm Gundert.” In The Study of Religion under the Impact of Fascism, edited by Horst Junginger, 613–33. Leiden: Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004163263.i-663.146
Kwee, Swan Liat. 1953. Methods of Comparative Philosophy. Leiden: Leiden University Dissertation.
Levinas, Emmanuel. 1932. “Martin Heidegger et l’ontologie.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Étranger 113: 395–431.
———. 1982. De l’évasion. Montpellier: Fata Morgana.
Lukács, György. 1955. Die Zerstörung der Vernunft: Der Weg des Irrationalismus von Schelling zu Hitler. Berlin: Aufbau Verlag.
Lüth, Paul. 1944. Die japanische Philosophie: Versuch einer Gesamtdarstellung unter Berücksichtigung der Anfänge in Mythus und Religion. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.
May, Reinhard. 1996. Heidegger’s Hidden Sources: East Asian Influences on his Work. London: Routledge.
Meyer, Hans. 1936. Das Wesen der Philosophie und die Philosophischen Probleme: Zugleich Eine Einführung in die Philosophie des Gegenwart. Bonn: P. Hanstein.
Naber, A. 1947. “Von der Philosophie des ‘Nichts’ zur Philosophie des ‘Seins selbst’: Zur grossen Wende im Philosophieren M. Heideggers.” En Gregorianum 28: 357–78.
Nara, Hiroshi. 2004. The Structure of Detachment: The Aesthetic Vision of Kuki Shūzō with a Translation of “Iki no kōzō”. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Nelson, Eric S. 2007. “History as Decision and Event in Heidegger.” Arhe 8: 97–115.
———. 2011. “The World Picture and its Conflict in Dilthey and Heidegger.” Humana Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies 18: 19–38.
———. 2013. “Heidegger and Carnap: Disagreeing about Nothing?” In Bloomsbury Companion to Heidegger, edited by François Raffoul, and Eric S. Nelson, 151–56. London: Bloomsbury Press.
———. 2017. Chinese and Buddhist Philosophy in Early Twentieth-Century German Thought. London: Bloomsbury.
———. 2019. “Heidegger’s Daoist Turn.” Research in Phenomenology 49 (3): 362–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15691640-12341431
———. 2020. “Language and Nothingness in Wang Bi.” In Dao Companion to Xuanxue (玄學 Neo-Daoism), edited by David Chai, 287–300. Cham: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49228-1_15
———. 2022. “Schopenhauer, Existential Negativity, and Buddhist Nothingness.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 49 (1): 83–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15406253-12340050
Neurath, Otto. 1933. Einheitswissenschaft und Psychologie. Vienna: Gerold & Co.
Nishida, Kitarō. 1939. “Die morgenländischen und abendländischen Kulturformen in alter Zeit vom metaphysischen Standpunkte aus gesehen.” Abhandlungen der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Philosophisch-Historische Klasse 19. Berlin: De Gruyter.
———. 1943. Die intelligible Welt: Drei philosophische Abhandlungen. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Nishitani, Keiji. 1983. Religion and Nothingness. Berkeley: University of California Press.
———. 1989. The Self-Overcoming of Nihilism. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Okakura, Kakuzō. 1919. Das Buch vom Tee. Leipzig: Insel.
Radhakrishnan, Sarvepalli. 1953. History of Philosophy: Eastern and Western. London: Allen & Unwin.
Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1943. L’Être et le néant. Paris: Gallimard.
Schinzinger, Robert. 1940. “Über Kitarô Nishidas Philosophie.” Monumenta Nipponica 3 (1): 28–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2382403
Szpilman, Christopher W. 2013. “Kanokogi Kazunobu: Pioneer of Platonic Fascism and Imperial Pan-Asianism.” Monumenta Nipponica 68 (2): 233–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/mni.2013.0024
Taketi, T. 1940. “Japanische Philosophie der Gegenwart.” Blätter für Deutsche Philosophie 14 (3): 277–99.
Takeuchi, Yoshinori. 2004. “The Philosophy of Nishida.” In The Buddha Eye: An Anthology of the Kyoto School and Its Contemporaries, third edition, edited by Frederick Franck, 183–207. Bloomington: World Wisdom.
Wahl, Jean. 1957. Traité de métaphysique. Paris: Payot.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Eric S. NELSON
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitting article, which will be published (print and online) in journal Asian Studies by Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, Aškerčeva 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). Author’s name will be evident in the article in journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in hands of the publisher.
- Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
