Hut Existence or Urban Dwelling?

Deprovincializing Heidegger from the East

Authors

  • Mario WENNING Loyola University Andalusia, Seville, Spain

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2023.11.1.51-68

Keywords:

Heidegger, Kuki, Buddhism, provincialism, urbanism

Abstract

Heidegger’s “Creative Landscapes: Why do we remain in the provinces?” and “Dialogue on Language” reveal the importance of rootedness for his existentialism. The article engages with the provinciality of Heidegger’s thought by juxtaposing his solitary “hut existence” to Buddhist compassion and the urban aesthetics of Kuki Shūzō. Turning to the East allows for a deprovincialization of Heideggerian themes. The rich philosophical legacy of reflecting on intercultural modernization and urbanization processes in East Asian philosophical traditions presents a genuine opportunity to rethink what it means to dwell today.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adorno, Theodor W. 1973. Jargon of Authenticity. Translated by Knut Tarnowski, and Frederic Will. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

Benl, Oscar. 1952. Seami Motokiyo und der Geist des Nō Schauspiels. Mainz: Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur.

Buchner, Hartmut, ed. 1989. Japan und Heidegger. Sigmaringen: Thorbecke.

Casey, Edward S. 2009. Getting Back into Place: Toward a Renewed Understanding of the Place-World. Indiana University Press.

Davis, Bret W. 1913. “Heidegger and Asian Philosophy.” In The Bloomsbury Companion to Heidegger, edited by Francois Raffoul, and Eric S. Nelson, 459–71. London, Oxford, New York, New Delhi, Sydney: Bloomsbury.

Gerbert, Elaine. 1998. “Space and Aesthetic Imagination in Some Taishō Writings.” In Japan’s Competing Modernities: Issues in Culture and Democracy 1900–1930, edited by Sharon A. Minichiello, 70–90. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824863159-006

Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich. 2000. “Martin Heidegger and His Japanese Interlocutors: About a Limit of Western Metaphysics.” Diacritics 30 (4): 83–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/dia.2000.0029

Habermas, Jürgen. 1981. “Urbanisierung der Heideggerschen Provinz.” In Philosophisch-politische Profile, 392–401. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

Han, Choong-su. 2004. “Heideggers Denken und sein Ort: ‘Orte des Denkens’ bzw. ‘Ort des Denkens’.” Polylog 31: 7–14.

Heidegger, Martin. 1959. “Aus einem Gespräch von der Sprache: Zwischen einem Japaner und einem Fragenden.” In Unterwegs zur Sprache (1950–1959). Pfullingen: Günther Neske.

———. 1967. Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

———. 1977. The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. Translated by William Lovitt. New York, London: Garland Publishing.

———. 1983a. “Schöpfersiche Landschaft: Warum Bleiben Wir in Der Provinz?” In Gesamtausgabe, edited by Hermann Heidegger, vol. 13, 9–13. Frankfurt: Klostermann.

———. 1983b. “Wege zur Aussprache (1937).” In Gesamtausgabe, edited by Friedrich-Wilhelm von Herrmann, vol. 13, 15–22. Frankfurt: Kostermann.

———. 1985. “Aus einem Gespräch von der Sprache zwischen einem Japaner und einem Fragenden (1953/54).” In Gesamtausgabe, edited by Friedrich-Wilhelm von Herrmann. vol. 12, 79–146. Frankfurt: Kostermann.

———. 1994. “Creative Landscape: Why Do We Stay in the Provinces?” In The Weimar Republic Sourcebook, edited by Anton Kaes, Martin Jay, and Edward Dimendberg, 426–28. Berkeley: University of California Press.

———. 1996. Being and Time. Translated by Joan Stambaugh. Albany: State University of New York Press.

———. 2001. Poetry, Language, Thought. Translated by Albert Hofstadter. New York: Harper.

———. 2004. “Zu Ernst Jünger. IV. Abteilung: Hinweise und Aufzeichnungen.” In Gesamtausgabe, edited by Peter Trawny, vol. 90. Frankfurt: Kostermann.

———. 2009. Letters to his Wife: 1915–1970. Translated by Rupert Glasgow. Cambridge UK: Polity.

Heubel, Fabian. 2020. Gewundene Wege nach China: Heidegger-Daoismus-Adorno. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783465144175

Honneth, Axel. 2003. “On the Destructive Power of the Third: Gadamer and Heidegger’s Doctrine of Intersubjectivity.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (1): 5–21 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453703029001830

Jünger, Ernst. 1981. Der Arbeiter. Stuttgart: Klett.

Kuki, Shūzō. 2011. Reflections on Japanese Taste: The Structure of Iki. Translated by John Clark. Sydney: Power Publications.

Ma, Lin. 2008. Heidegger on East-West Dialogue: Anticipating the Event. Leiden: Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203927786

May, Reinhard. 1996. Heidegger’s Hidden Sources: East Asian Influences on His Work. Translated and with a complementary essay by Graham Parkes. London: Routledge.

Metcalf, Robert. 2012. “‘Bodenständigkeit’ in the Technological Age.” Research in Phenomenology 42 (1): 49–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156916412X628748

Mikkelsen, Jon Mark. 2004. “Reading Kuki Shūzō’s The Structure of Iki in the Shadow of L’affaire Heidegger.” In The Structure of Detachment: The Aesthetic Vision of Kuki Shūzō, edited by Hiroshi Nara, 148–70. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824865054-007

Nara, Hiroshi. 2004. The Structure of Detachment: The Aesthetic Vision of Kuki Shūzō. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.

Nelson, Eric. 2023. “Heidegger and Kitayama Junyu: Nothingness, Emptiness, and the Thing.” Asian Studies 11:1.

Ohashi, Ryosuke. 1989. “Heidegger und ‘Graf’ Kuki. Zu Sprache und Kunst in Japan als Problem der Moderne.” In Von Heidegger her: Messkirchner Vorträge, edited by Hans Helmut Gander, 93–104. Frankfurt: Klostermann.

———. 2018. Phänomenologie der Compassion: Pathos des Mitseins. Freiburg, Munich: Alber.

Parkes, Graham. 1987. Heidegger and Asian Thought. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824845384

Petzet, Heinrich Wiegand. 1993. Encounters and Dialogues with Martin Heidegger: 1929–1976. Translated by Parvis Emad, and Kenneth Maly. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Pincus, Leslie. 1996. Authenticating Culture in Imperial Japan: Kuki Shuzo and the Rise of National Aesthetics. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520916487

Scharr, Adam. 2006. Heidegger’s Hut. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.

Sloterdijk, Peter. 2016. Not Saved: Essays after Heidegger. London: Polity.

Stapleton, Kristin. 2022. The Modern City in Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108992947

Sunar, Lutfi. 2019. “The Weberian City, Civil Society, and Turkish Social Thought.” In The Oxford Handbook of Max Weber, edited by Hanke, E., Scaff, L., and Whimster, S., 207–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190679545.013.12

Vlastos, Stephen, ed. 1998. Mirror of Modernity: Invented Traditions of Modern Japan. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Watsuji, Tetsurō. 1988. Climate and Culture: A Philosophical Study. Translated by Geoffrey Bownas. New York: Greenwood Press.

Wilding, Adrian. 2005. “Why We Don’t Remain in the Provinces.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 3 (1):1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453705048322

Downloads

Published

10.01.2023

How to Cite

Wenning, M. (2023). Hut Existence or Urban Dwelling? Deprovincializing Heidegger from the East. Asian Studies, 11(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2023.11.1.51-68

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 1 (2023): Special Issue: Transcultural (Post)Comparative Philosophy, Part 2: Philosophical Dialogues between East Asia and Europe: From Plotinus to Heidegger and Beyond

Section

Dialogues with Heidegger

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Mario WENNING

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitting article, which will be published (print and online) in journal Asian Studies by Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, Aškerčeva 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). Author’s name will be evident in the article in journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in hands of the publisher.
  2. Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
  3. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.