Manifest Quasi-Universals and Embedding Conceptual Clusters

The Case of Qíng 情

Authors

  • Jaap VAN BRAKEL University of Leuven, Higher Institute of Philosophy, Belgium
  • MA Lin Renmin University of China, School of Philosophy, Beijing, China https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8784-393X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2022.10.3.127-156

Keywords:

translation, Chinese, qíng, quasi-universals, embedding conceptual clusters

Abstract

We start this article with a discussion of the problematics involved in translating into modern English a (modern) Chinese text concerning a classical Chinese notion, namely qíng 情. Then, we suggest that it is necessary to distinguish between two levels on which a language is used. The first is the manifest level, where one finds family resemblance between, say, Chinese 怒 and English “anger”. The second is the generic level, where one finds qíng in classical Chinese, qínggaˇn in modern Chinese, and emotion(s) in English. We argue that the meanings of words at the generic level can only be accessed via the manifest level. It is misleading to directly identify and compare notions at the generic level (in this case, emotion(s) in English and qíng in Chinese). We call the connections at the manifest level “quasi-universals”, and we refer to the notions at the generic level as “embedding conceptual clusters”.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andreini, Attilio. 2006. “The Meaning of Qing 情 in Texts from Guodian Tomb no. 1.” In Love, Hatred, and Other Passions: Questions and Themes on Emotions in Chinese Civilization, edited by Paolo Santangelo, and Donatella Guida, 149–65. Leiden-Boston: Brill.

Baker, G. P., and P. M. S. Hacker. 2009. Wittgenstein: Understanding and Meaning. Part I: Essays. Second, extensively revised edition by P. M. S. Hacker, ed. Vol. 1 of An Analytical Commentary on Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations. PART I. Oxford: Blackwell.

Chan, Shirley. 2009. “Human Nature and Moral Cultivation in the Guodian Text of the Xing zi ming chu (Nature Derives from Mandate).” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 8: 361–82. DOI: 0.1007/s11712-009-9138-5.

Chen, Guying. 2016. The Philosophy of Life: A New Reading of the Zhuangzi. Leiden: Brill.

Chen, Lai. 2004. “The Discussion of Mind and Nature in Zhu Xi’s Philosophy.” In Chinese Philosophy in an Era of Globalization, edited by Robin R. Wang, 75–98. Bingham: SUNY Press.

Cook, Scott. 2012. The Bamboo Texts of Guodian: A Study and Complete Translation. Ithaca NY: Cornell University.

Despeux, Catherine. 2004. “Feeling in Zhuangzi. From Joy to Serenity.” In Expressions of States of Mind in Asia, edited by P. Santangelo, 73–93. Napoli: Università degli Studi di Napoli “L’Orientale”.

Durrant, Stephen, Wai-yee Li, and David Schaberg, transl. 2016. Zuo Tradition Zuozhuan 左傳 Commentery on the “Spring and Autumn Annals”. Seattle, London: University of Washington Press.

Eifring, Halvor. 2004. “Introduction: Emotions and the Conceptual History of Qing 情.” In Love and Emotions in Traditional Chinese Literature, edited by Halvor Eifring, 1–36. Leiden: Brill.

Fang, Yong 方勇, and Li Bo 李波. 2011. Xunzi (annotated and translated). Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.

Goldin, Paul Rakita. 2000. “Xunzi in the Light of the Guodian Manuscripts.” Earley China 25: 113–46.

Hightower, James Robert, transl. 1952. Han Shih Wai Chuan. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

Hutton, Eric L., transl. 2014. Xunzi: The Complete Text. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

———, ed. 2016. Dao Companion to the Philosophy of Xunzi. Dordrecht: Springer.

Knoblock, John, transl. 1994. Xunzi: A Translation and Study of the Complete Works. Volume III. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Legge, James, transl. 1885. “The Li Ki (Liji 禮記): A Collection of Treatises on the Rules of Propriety and Ceremonial Usages.” In Sacred Books of the East. Oxford: At the Clarendon Press. https://ctext.org.

Lynn, Richard John, transl. 1994. The Classic of Changes: A New Translation of the I Ching as Interpreted by Wang Bi. New York: Colubia University Press.

Ma, Lin, and Jaap van Brakel. 2016a. Fundamentals of Comparative and Intercultural Philosophy. Albany NY: State University of New York Press.

———. 2016b. “A Theory of Interpretation for Comparative and Chinese Philosophy.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 15: 575–89. DOI: 10.1007/s11712-016-9522-x.

———. 2016c. “Revisiting Wittgenstein on Family Resemblance and Colour(s).” Philosophical Investigations 39 (3): 254–80.

———. 2018. “On the Interpreter’s Choices: Making Hermeneutic Relativity Explicit.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 17: 453–78. DOI: 10.1007/s11712-018-9638-2.

———. 2021. “Re-visiting the Exchange between Zhuangzi and Huizi on Qing 情.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 20: 133–49. DOI: 10.1007/s11712-020-09765-6.

———. 2022. “Necessary Preconditions of the Practice of Comparative Philosophy.” In Comparative Philosophy and Method, edited by Steven Burik, Robert Smid, and Ralph Weber, 31–52. London: Bloomsbury Press.

Middendorf, Ulrike. 2008. “Again on Qing: With a Translation of the Guodian Xing zi ming chu.” Oriens Extremus 47: 97–159.

Ng, On-cho. 1998. “Is Emotion (Qing) the Source of a Confucian Antinomy.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 25: 169–90.

Perkins, Franklin. 2009. “Motivation and the Heart in the Xing zi ming chu.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 8: 117–31. DOI: 10.1007//s11712-009-9106-0.

Rouzer, Paul. 2007. A New Practical Primer of Literary Chinese (Harvard East Asian Monographs 276). Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

Silius, Vytis. 2020. “Diversifying Academic Philosophy: The Post-comparative Turn and Transculturalism.” Asian Studies 8 (2): 257–80. DOI: 10.4312/as.2020.8.2.257-280.

Tang, Yijie. 2001. “Dào shıˇyú qíng” de zhéxué quánshì “道始于情”的哲学诠释 (A Philosophical Interpretation of “Dao Begins with Qing”).” Xuéshù yuèkān《學術月刊》(Academic Monthly) (7): 40–44.

———. 2003. “Emotion in Pre-Qin Ruist Moral Theory: An Explanation of “Dao Begins in Qing”.” Philosophy East and West 53 (2): 271–81. DOI:10.1353/pew.2003.0018.

———. 2015. “Emotion in Pre-Qin Ruist Moral Theory: An Explanation of “Dao Begins in Qing”.” In Confucianism, Buddhism, Daoism, Christianity and Chinese Culture, 55–65. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-45533-3_4.

van Brakel, Jaap, and Lin Ma. 2015. “Extension of Family Resemblance Concepts as a Necessary Condition of Interpretation Across Traditions.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy (4): 475–97. DOI: 10.1007/s11712-015-9457-7.

Virág, Curie. 2014. “Early Confucian Perspectives on Emotions.” In Dao Companion to Classsical Confucian Philosophy, edited by Vincent Shen, 203–25. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI:10.1007/978-90-481-2936-2_9.

Wang, Rongpei, transl. 1999. Zhuangzi. Hunan: Hunan People’s Publishing House.

Watson, Burton, transl. 1963. Basic Writings of Mo Tzu, Hsün Tzu, and Han Fei Tzu. New York: Columbia University Press.

———, transl. 1968. The Complete Works of Chuang Tzu. New York: Columbia University Press.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 2009. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell. Fourth edition, translated by G. E. M. Anscombe, P. M. S. Hacker, and J. Schulte. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Ye, Zhengdao. 2006. “Why Are There Two ‘Joy-Like’ ‘Basic’ Emotions in Chinese? Semantic Theory and Empirical Findings.” In Love, Hatred, and Other Passions: Questions and Themes on Emotions in Chinese Civilization, edited by Paolo Santangelo, and Donatella Guida, 59–79. Leiden-Boston: Brill.

Zhang, Dainian. 2002. Key Concepts in Chinese Philosophy. Translated by E. Ryden. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.

Zhang, Ruihua, and Vincent B. Y. Ooi. 2008. “A Corpus-Based Analysis Of Qing (情): A Contrastive-Semantic Perspective (29 pp.). Paper read at Using Corpora in Contrastive and Translation Studies, at Hangzhou.

Zhu, Xi 朱熹. 2011. Sìshū zhāngjù jízhù 《四書章句集注》(Four Books: Collected Commentaries). Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.

Downloads

Published

02.09.2022

How to Cite

van Brakel, J., & Ma, L. (2022). Manifest Quasi-Universals and Embedding Conceptual Clusters: The Case of Qíng 情. Asian Studies, 10(3), 127–156. https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2022.10.3.127-156