Translation as a Philosophical Method
A Postcomparative Take on the Universality-Particularity Tension
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2022.10.3.59-80Keywords:
postcomparative philosophy, comparison, translation as method, universality, particularityAbstract
The article aims for a critical reflection on the practices and methodology of the so-called comparative philosophy. It starts from an observation that the recent successful developments in comparative philosophy nevertheless have a very limited impact outside the discipline. The article argues that a specific universality-particularity tension is to blame. Because “comparison” as a method also inherently displays this tension, and thus cannot overcome it, the article suggests seeing translation as a method of philosophical thinking. It is argued that this constitutes a postcomparative take on universality-particularity tension and a postcomparative response to the need for a more culturally inclusive academic philosophy. The advantages of looking at translation as a core methodological stance in intercultural postcomparative philosophy are suggested.
Downloads
References
Alves, Fabio, and Arnt Lykke Jakobsen, eds. 2020. “Introduction.” In The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Cognition, 1–21. London and New York: Routledge.
Appiah, Kwame Anthony. 1992. In my Father’s House: Africa in the Philosophy of Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baggini, Julian. 2018. “About Time: Why Western Philosophy can Only Teach us so Much.” The Guardian, September 25, 2018. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/sep/25/about-time-why-western-philosophy-canonly-teachus-so-much. Accessed March 23, 2019.
Behr, Hartmut, and Felix Roesch. 2010. “Comparing ‘Systems’ and ‘Cultures’: Between Universalities, Imperialism, and Indigenousity.” In Vergleichende Regierungslehre: Eine Einführung, edited by Hans-Joachim Lauth, 73–91. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92357-4_3.
Benjamin, Andrew. 1989. Translation and the Nature of Philosophy: A New Theory of Words, 2nd edition. London, New York: Routledge.
Benjamin, Walter. 1997 [1923]. “The Task of the Translator.” Translated by Steven Rendall. TTR: traduction, terminologie, rédaction 10 (2): 151–65. http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/037302ar. The original German text was consulted from https://www.textlog.de/benjamin-aufgabe-uebersetzers.html. Accessed February 1, 2022.
Berniūnas, Renatas, Audrius Beinorius, Vilius Dranseika, Vytis Silius, and Paulius Rimkevičius. 2021. “The Weirdness of Belief in Free Will.” Consciousness and Cognition 87: 103054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2020.103054.
Chakrabarti, Arindam, and Ralph Weber. 2022. “Global Post-Comparative Philosophy as Just Philosophy.” In Comparative Philosophy and Method: Contemporary Practices and Future Possibilities, edited by Steven Burik, Robert Smid, and Ralph Weber, 159–77. London, New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Chen, Shaoming 陈少明. 2015. Zuo Zhongguo zhexue: yixie fangfalun de sikao 做中国哲学：一些方法论的思考 (Doing Chinese Philosophy: Some Reflections on Methodology). Beijing: Shenghuo, dushu, xinzhi sanlian shudian.
Chesterman, Andrew. 2020. “Translation, Epistemology and Cognition.” In The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Cognition, edited by Fabio Alves, and Arnt Lykke Jakobsen, 25–36. London, New York: Routledge.
Claes, Tom. 1990. “Culture and Morality Revisited.” Cultural Dynamics 3 (4): 349–86. doi:10.1177/092137409000300402.
Davidson, Donald. 1973. “On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 47: 5–20.
Diagne, Souleymane Bachir. 2022. “Translation as Method.” In Comparative Philosophy and Method: Contemporary Practices and Future Possibilities, edited by Steven Burik, Robert Smid, and Ralph Weber, 89–95. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Disler, Caroline. 2011. “Benjamin’s ‘Afterlife’: A Productive (?) Mistranslation. In Memoriam Daniel Simeoni.” TTR: traduction, terminologie, rédaction 24 (1): 183–221. https://doi.org/10.7202/1013259ar.
Douglas, Mary. 1983. “Morality and Culture.” Ethics 93 (4): 786–91. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2380684.
Faubion, James D. 2011. An Anthropology of Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Feldman Barrett, Lisa. 2017. How Emotions Are Made: The Secret Life of the Brain. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Howell, Signe, ed. 1997. The Ethnography of Moralities. London, New York: Routledge.
Klenk, Michael. 2019. “Moral Philosophy and the ‘Ethical Turn’ in Anthropology.” ZEMO 2: 331–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42048-019-00040-9.
Laidlaw, James. 2014. The Subject of Virtue: An Anthropology of Ethics and Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lambek, Michael. 2010. “Introduction.” In Ordinary Ethics: Anthropology, Language, and Action, edited by Michael Lambek, 1–36. New York: Fordham University Press.
Macdonald, Kathleen. 2020. “Translation, Anthropology and Cognition.” In The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Cognition, edited by Fabio Alves and Arnt Lykke Jakobsen, 91–112. London, New York: Routledge.
Ricoeur, Paul. 2006. On Translation. Translated by Eileen Brennan. London and New York: Routledge. (First published in French: 2004. Sur la traduction. Paris: Bayard.)
Rorty, Richard. 1989a. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 1989b. “Review of Gerarld J. Larson and Eliot Deutsch: Interpreting Across Boundaries: New Essays in Comparative Philosophy.” Philosophy East and West 39: 332–37.
Rosemont, Henry, Jr. 2004. “Whose Democracy? Which Rights? A Confucian Critique of Modern Western Liberalism.” In Confucian Ethics: A Comparative Study of Self, Autonomy, and Community, edited by Kwong-loi Shun, and David B. Wong, 49–71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2015. Against Individualism: A Confucian Rethinking of the Foundations of Morality, Politics, Family, and Religion. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Rošker, Jana. 2012. “Cultural Conditionality of Comprehension: The Perception of Autonomy in China.” In Reinventing Identities: The Poetics of Language Use in Contemporary China, edited by Tian Hailong, and Cao Qing, 26–42. Tianjin: Nankai daxue chuban she.
———. 2020. “Chinese Philosophy, ‘Postcomparative’ Approaches and Transcultural Studies: A Reply to Vytis Silius.” Asian Studies 8 (3): 305–16.
Ruitenberg, Claudia W. 2009. “Distance and Defamiliarisation: Translation as Philosophical Method.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 43: 421–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.2009.00697.x.
Saito, Naoko. 2007. “Philosophy as Translation: Democracy and Education from Dewey to Cavell.” Educational Theory 57: 261–75.
Schleiermacher, Friedrich. 2012 [1813]. “On Different Methods of Translating.” Translated by Susan Bernofsky. In The Translation Studies Reader, edited by Lawrence Venuti, 3rd edition, 43–63. London, New York: Routledge.
Shun, Kwong-loi. 2009. “Studying Confucian and Comparative Ethics: Methodological Reflections.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 36 (3): 455–78.
Sidnell, Jack. 2010. “The Ordinary Ethics of Everyday Talk.” In Ordinary Ethics: Anthropology, Language, and Action, edited by Michael Lambek, 123–39. New York: Fordham University Press.
Silius, Vytis. 2020. “Diversifying Academic Philosophy: The Post-Comparative Turn and Transculturalism.” Asian Studies 8 (2): 257–80.
Skinner, Quentin. 1969. “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas.” History and Theory 8 (1): 3–53.
Steiner, George. 1975. After Babel: Aspects of Language and Translation, 3rd edition. New York: Open Road, 1997.
Strathern, Marilyn. 1992. Reproducing the Future: Anthropology, Kinship and The New Reproductive Technologies. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Weber, Ralph. 2013. “‘How to Compare?’: On the Methodological State of Comparative Philosophy.” Philosophy Compass 8 (7): 593–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12042.
———. 2014. “Comparative Philosophy and the Tertium: Comparing What with What, and in What Respect?” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 13 (2): 151–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-014-9368-z.
Whyatt, Boguslawa. 2017. “Intralingual Translation.” In The Handbook of Translation and Cognition, edited by John W. Schwieter and Aline Ferreira, 176–92. Maden: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Zigon, Jarrett. 2007. “Moral Breakdown and the Ethical Demand: A Theoretical Framework for an Anthropology of Moralities.” Anthropological Theory 7 (2): 131–50.
———. 2008. Morality: An Anthropological Perspective. Oxford, New York: BERG.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Vytis SILIUS
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitting article, which will be published (print and online) in journal Asian Studies by Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, Aškerčeva 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). Author’s name will be evident in the article in journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in hands of the publisher.
- Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
