Commensurability and Difference

A Hermeneutic-Deconstructive Engagement with Chinese Philosophy


  • Geir SIGURÐSSON University of Iceland, School of Humanities, Faculty of Languages and Cultures, Reykjavík, Iceland



Chinese philosophy, hermeneutics, Gadamer, Ricoeur, Derrida, différance


In this explorative paper, I propose that relatively recent trends in Western continental philosophy can provide a much more commensurate access to Chinese philosophy than found in most mainstream Western philosophy. More specifically, I argue that three prominent European philosophical approaches to interpretation can offer meaningful parallels to classical Confucian views of interpretation. These are Paul Ricoeur’s term “distanciation”, Hans-Georg Gadamer’s philosophy of hermeneutics and, finally, Jacques Derrida’s deconstructive notion of “différance”. While the last two approaches have had their internal clashes, I see them in this specific case as mutually reinforcing by stimulating the continuous reinterpretation of tradition, advancing the view that Western and Chinese philosophies cannot be reduced to the other in conceptual terms, and stipulating that a finalized meaning or interpretation of each is a priori unattainable. In this way, they provide a future opening for—and even integration of—a Chinese-Western philosophical dialogue.


Download data is not yet available.


Ames, Roger T. 2004. “Indigenizing Globalization and the Hydraulics of Culture: Taking Chinese Philosophy on its Own Terms.” Globalizations 1 (2): 171–80. DOI:

Bollnow, Otto Friedrich. 1979. “What does it Mean to Understand a Writer Better than He Understood Himself?” Translated by Mary Algozin, and Keith Algozin. Philosophy Today 22 (1/4): 10–22. DOI:

Derrida, Jacques. 1982. Margins of Philosophy. Translated by Alan Bass. Brighton: The Harvester Press Limited.

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1990. Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik, 6th edition. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).

Hall, David L., and Roger T. Ames. 1998. Thinking from the Han: Self, Truth, and Transcendence in Chinese and Western Culture. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Huang, Chun-chieh. 2001. Mencian Hermeneutics. A History of Interpretations in China. New Brunswick/London: Transaction Publishers.

———. 2007. “The ‘Body Politic’ in Ancient China.” Acta Orientalia Vilnensia 8 (4): 33–43. DOI:

Jullien, François. 2000. Detour and Access: Strategies of Meaning in China and Greece. Translated by Sophie Hawkes. New York: Zone Books.

Lau, D. C.,transl. 1963. Tao Te Ching. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.

Leys, Simon. 2011. The Hall of Uselessness. Collected Essays. New York: New York Review Books.

MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1991. “Incommensurability, Truth, and the Conversation Between Confucians and Aristotelians about the Virtues.” In Culture and Modernity: East-West Philosophic Perspectives, edited by Eliot Deutsch, 104–22. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. DOI:

Nietzsche, Friedrich. [1887] 1988. Zur Genealogie der Moral. Sämtliche Werke 5. Berlin, New York: dtv/de Gruyter.

Ricoeur, Paul. 2016. Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences. Essays on Language, Action and Interpretation. Edited and translated by John B. Thompson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI:

Roetz, Heiner. 2016. “Closed or Open? On Chinese Axial Age Society.” Bochum Yearbook of East Asian Studies 39: 137–69.

———. 2017. “Die Achsenzeit im Diskurs der chinesischen Moderne.” Polylog. Zeitschrift für interkulturelles Philosophieren 38: 63–80.

Rosa, Hartmut. 2020. The Uncontrollability of the World. Translated by James C. Wagner. Cambridge, UK, Medford, MA: Polity.

Rošker, Jana S. 2021. Interpreting Chinese Philosophy. A New Methodology. London et al.: Bloomsbury Academic. DOI:

Sigurðsson, Geir. 2015. Confucian Propriety and Ritual Learning: A Philosophical Interpretation. Albany: SUNY Press.

———. 2020. “Confucian Philosophy as a Universal Approach to Integrated Living: A Contemporary Interpretation.” In Differences in Identity in Philosophy and Religion: A Cross-Cultural Approach, edited by Sarah Flavel, and Russell Re Manning, 7–19. London: Bloomsbury.

———. 2021. “Who’s Afraid of Village Worthies?” In One Corner of the Square. Essays on the Philosophy of Roger T. Ames, edited by Ian M. Sullivan, and Joshua Mason, 216–25. Honolulu: University of Hawaiʻi Press. DOI:

Slingerland, Edward. 2001. “Virtue Ethics, the Analects, and the Problem of Commensurability.” Journal of Religious Ethics 29 (1): 97–125. DOI:

Thorsteinsson, Björn. 2014. “Writing the Violence of Time: Derrida Beyond the Deconstruction of Metaphysics.” In A Companion to Derrida, edited by Zeynep Direk, and Lonard Lawlor, 150–65. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI:

Vessey, David. 2009. “Gadamer and the Fusion of Horizons.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (4): 531–42. DOI:

Warnke, Georgia. 1987. Gadamer. Hermeneutics, Tradition and Reason. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Weber, Max. 1988a. “Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus.” In Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie I, 17–206. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).

———. 1988b. “Die ‘Objektivität’ sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis.” In Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre, 164–214. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).

Yu, Jiyuan. 2007. The Ethics of Confucius and Aristotle: Mirrors of Virtue. New York and London: Routledge.

Zhu, Weizheng. 1990. Coming Out of the Middle Ages. Comparative Reflections on China and the West. Translated by Ruth Hayhoe. Armonk, London: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.



10. 01. 2023

How to Cite

Sigurðsson, Geir. 2023. “Commensurability and Difference: A Hermeneutic-Deconstructive Engagement With Chinese Philosophy”. Asian Studies 11 (1): 317-33.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 257

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.