Humean Elements in the Teachings of Itō Jinsai
A Study of Moral Motivation in Confucian Ethics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2023.11.1.181-205Keywords:
Itō Jinsai, David Hume, structural coherence li, moral motivation, sentimentalismAbstract
The present article juxtaposes selected elements of the Humean position on moral motivation with the ethical teachings of the Edo period Japanese Confucian scholar Itō Jinsai—especially the latter’s critical reading of the notion of structural coherence li, his defence of human feelings as the fundamental ground of moral motivation and his views on the origins of moral sentiment. In doing so, the article aims to show that there is an interesting line going through Jinsai’s work that might be argued to bear, within the philosophical project of Confucian ethics, similarities to certain of Hume’s more famous positions, which it actually predates.
Downloads
References
Angle, Stephen C. 2018. “Buddhism and Zhu Xi’s Epistemology of Discernment.” In The Buddhist Roots of Zhu Xi’s Philosophical Thought, edited by John Makeham, 156–92. New York: Oxford University Press.
Carey, Jeremiah, and Rico Vitz. 2019. “Mencius, Hume, and the Virtue of Humanity: Sources of Benevolent Moral Development.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy. Accessed July 15, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2019.1671310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2019.1671310
Huang, Chun-chieh. 2015. East Asian Confucianisms: Texts in Context. Taipei: National Taiwan University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14220/9783737004084
Hume, David. 2000. A Treatise of Human Nature. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jorgensen, John. 2018. “The Radiant Mind: Zhu Xi and the Chan Doctrine of Tathāgatagarbha.” In The Buddhist Roots of Zhu Xi’s Philosophical Thought, edited by John Makeham, 36–121. New York: Oxford University Press.
Koyasu, Nobukuni 子安宣邦. 2015. Jinsaigaku kougi 仁斎学講義 (Lectures on the Jinsai School). Tokyo: Perikansha.
Lee, Ming-huei. 2017. “The Four-Seven Debate between Yi Toegye and Gi Gobong and Its Philosophical Purport.” In Confucianism: Its Roots and Global Significance, edited by David Jones, 54–75. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv3zp043.10 Accessed: 12-05-2020.
Liji 禮記 [Book of Rites]. s.d. Accessed March 3, 2020. https://ctext.org/liji.
MacCormac, Earl R. 1976. Metaphor and Myth in Science and Religion. Durham: Duke University Press.
Makeham, John. 2018. “Monism and the Problem of Ignorance and Badness in Chinese Buddhism and Zhu Xi’s Neo-Confucianism.” In The Buddhist Roots of Zhu Xi’s Philosophical Thought, edited by John Makeham, 277–344. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190878559.003.0006
Mengzi 孟子 [Mencius]. s.d. Accessed May 14, 2020. https://ctext.org/mengzi.
Ogrizek, Marko. 2021. “Japanese Reinterpretations of Confucianism: Itō Jinsai and His Project.” Asian Studies 9 (2): 183–208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2021.9.2.183-208
Ott, Margus. 2020. “Deleuzian (Re)interpretation of Zhu Xi”. Asian Studies 8 (2): 281–310. https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2020.8.2.281-310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2020.8.2.281-310
Rošker, Jana. 2012. Traditional Chinese Philosophy and the Paradigm of Structure (Li 理). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
———. 2018. “Strukturna zveza zavesti ter zunanjega sveta v kitajski tradiciji.” Asian Studies 6 (1): 161–81. https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2018.6.1.161-181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2018.6.1.161-181
Shimizu, Shigeru 清水茂. 2017. Dōjimon 童子問 (Children’s Questions). Tokyo: Iwanami shoten.
Tang, Junyi. 唐君毅. 1986. Zhongguo zhexue yuanlun: Daolunpian 中國哲學原論: 導論篇 (On the Origin of Chinese Philosophy: Introduction). Taipei: Taiwan xuesheng shuju.
Thompson, Kirill Ole. 2017. “Lessons from Zhu Xi’s Views on Inquiry and Learning for Contemporary Advanced Humanities Education and Research.” Asian Studies 5 (2): 11–42. https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2017.5.2.11-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2017.5.2.11-42
Tiwald, Justin. 2018. “Zhu Xi’s Critique of Buddhism: Selfishness, Salvation, and Self-Cultivation.” In The Buddhist Roots of Zhu Xi’s Philosophical Thought, edited by John Makeham, 122–55. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tucker, John Allen. 1998. Itō Jinsai’s Gomō Jigi and the Philosophical Definition of Early Modern Japan. Leiden, Boston, Köln: Brill (Brill’s Japanese Studies Library).
Yamashita, Samuel Hideo. 1983. “The Early Life and Thought of Itō Jinsai.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 43 (2): 453–80. Accessed February 14, 2014. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2719107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2719107
Yoshikawa, Kōjiro吉川幸次郎, and Shimizu Shigeru清水茂. 1971. “Itō Jinsai, Itō Tōgai” Nihon shisō taikei 33「伊藤仁斎・伊藤東涯」日本思想体系 33 (“Itō Jinsai, Itō Tōgai” The System of Japanese Thought, vol. 33). Tokyo: Iwanami shoten.
Zhuzi yulei 朱子語類 [Classified Conversations of Master Zhu]. s.d. Accessed May 22, 2020. https://ctext.org/zhuzi-yulei.
Ziporyn, Brook. 2008. “Form, Principle, Pattern, or Coherence? Li in Chinese Philosophy.” Philosophy Compass 3 (3): 401–22. Accessed July 10, 2022. https://bunker4.zlibcdn.com/dtoken/4474840ef9dfdb5fa7cfa589171cf194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2008.00135.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Marko OGRIZEK
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitting article, which will be published (print and online) in journal Asian Studies by Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, Aškerčeva 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). Author’s name will be evident in the article in journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in hands of the publisher.
- Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
