The “Greening” of Daoism

Potential and Limits

Authors

  • Ellen Y. ZHANG University of Macau, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2023.11.2.69-94

Keywords:

Daoism, environmental ethics, animal ethics, anthropocentrism, ziran, wuwei

Abstract

In recent decades there has been much discussion of Daoist thought in the light of environmental or ecological ethics. In this paper, I will discuss the meanings of ziran and wuwei, the two key terms in Daoism within its own tradition and then explore the possibility of establishing a form of “green Daoism” through an interpretative reconstruction of a ziran-wuwei ethic that is relevant to environmental and ecological concerns. I will argue that the Daoist idea of ziran-wuwei does not simply mean to accept things passively, but rather it entails a proactive dimension that can be used to challenge aggressiveness and destructive attitudes towards eco-cosmic unity and diversity. The paper intends to show that although some of the ecological issues we address today may not be the major concerns of ancient Daoism, and that the complexity of the ecological problems and solutions are dependent on modern technology, it will not prevent us from taking Daoism as a cultural resource with which we can examine the human place in nature in view of the current environmental crisis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ames, Roger T., and David L. Hall, trans. 2003. Daodejing: “Making This Life Significant”. New York: The Ballantine Publishing Group.

Ames, Roger T. 2001. “The Local and the Focal in Realizing a Daoist World.” In Daoism and Ecology: Ways within a Cosmic Landscape, edited by N. J. Girardot, James Miller, and Liu Xiaogan, 265–82. Harvard University Press.

Anderson, E. N., and Lisa Raphals. 2006. “Daoism and Animals.” In A Communion of Subjects: Animals in Religion, Science, and Ethics, edited by Paul Waldau, and Kimberley Patton, 275–92. New York: Columbia University Press.

Baudrillard, Jean. 1999. The Consumer Society. London: Sage Publication.

Boaz, David. 1998. Libertarianism: A Primer. New York: Free Press.

Broy, Nikolas. 2019. “Moral Integration or Social Segregation? Vegetarianism and Vegetarian Religious Communities in Chinese Religious Life.” In Concepts and Methods for the Study of Chinese Religions, vol. III, edited by Gregory Adam Scott, and Stefania Travagnin, 37–64. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110547849-003

Chan, Wing-tsit. 1969. A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Chen, Weifen 陳瑋芬. 2010. “Riben ziran gainian kaobian <日本「自然」概念考辨> (Examination and Identification of the Concept of Ziran in Japan).” Zhongguo wenzhe yanjiu jikan 中國文哲研究集刊 (Bulletin of the Institute of Chinese Literature and Philosophy) 36: 103–35.

Chen, Xia 陳霞. 2010. Daojiao shengtai sixiang yanjiu 道教生態思想研究 (A Study of Daoist Ecology). Sichuan: Bashu.

Cheng, Chung-ying. 1986. “On the Environmental Ethics of the Tao and the Ch’i.” Environmental Ethics 8: 351–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics19868436

Creel, Herrlee G. 1970. What Is Taoism?: And Other Studies in Chinese Cultural History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

D’Ambrosio, Paul J. 2021. “Non-humans in the Zhuangzi: Animalism and Anti-anthropocentrism.” Asian Philosophy 2 (1): 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09552367.2021.1934218

Dubs, H. H., trans. 1928. The Works of Hsun Tzu. London: Probstain.

Epting, Shane. 2010. “Questioning Technology/s Role in Environmental Ethics: Weak Anthropocentrism Revisited.” Interdisciplinary Environmental Review 11 (1): 18–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IER.2010.034603

Feng, Huxiang 馮滬祥. 1991. Huanjing lunlixue: Zhongxi huanbao zhexue bijiao yanjiu 環境倫理學––中西環保哲學比較研究 (Environmental Ethics: A Comparative Study of Environmental Philosophy between the Chinese and Western). Taibei: Xuesheng shuju.

Fung, Yu-lan. 1984. A Short History of Chinese Philosophy. New York: Macmillan.

Fox, Alan.1996. “Reflex and Reflectivity: Wuwei in the Zhuangzi.” Asian Philosophy 6 (1): 59–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09552369608575428

Girardot N. J., James Miller, and Liu Xiaogan, eds. 2001. Daoism and Ecology: Ways within a Cosmic Landscape. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Godin, Paul R. 20025. “Why Daoism is Not Environmentalism.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 32 (1): 75–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15406253-03201006

Hall, David. L. 1987. “On Seeking a Change of Environment: A Quasi-Taoist Proposal.” Philosophy: East and West 37 (2):160–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1398736

Heidegger, Martin. 1998. ‘‘Traditional Language and Technological Language.” Journal of Philosophical Research 23: 129–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/jpr_1998_16

Hendrischke, Barbara, trans. 2015. The Scripture on Great Peace: The Taiping Jing and the Beginning of Daoism. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Ivanhoe, Philip. J. 2011. “Hanfeizi and Moral Cultivation.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 38 (1): 31–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6253.2011.01627.x

Jenkins, T. J. 2002. “Chinese Traditional Thought and Practice: Lessons for an Ecological Economics Worldview.” Ecological Economics 40 (1): 39–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00263-4

Jiang, Zhaojun 蔣朝君. 2006. Daojiao shengtai lunli sixiang yuanjiu 道教生態倫理思想研究 (A Research into the Thinking of Daoist Ecological Ethics). Beijing: Dongfang chubanshe.

Kirkland, Russel. 2001. “Responsible Non-Action in a Natural World: Perspectives from the Neiye, Zhuangzi, and Daode Jing.” In Daoism and Ecology: Ways Within a Cosmic Landscape, edited by N. J. Girardot, James Miller, and Liu Xiaogan, 283–304. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Komjathy, Louis. 2009. “The Great Unity: Daoism, Nonhuman Animals, and Human Ethics.” Journal for Critical Animal Studies 7 (2): 63–83.

Lai, Karyn. 2007. “Ziran and Wuwei in the Daodejing: An Ethical Assessment.” Dao 6: 325–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-007-9019-8

Littlejohn, Ronnie. 2009. Daoism: An Introduction. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Liu, Xiaogan. 2009. “Transition and Articulation between Two Orientations: An Experimental Analysis of a New Interpretation of Ziran.” Contemporary Chinese Thought 40 (2): 67–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/CSP1097-1467400204

Marshall, Peter. 1992. Demanding the Impossible: A History of Anarchism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Miller, James, 2017. China’s Green Religion: Daoism and the Quest for a Sustainable Future. New York: Columbia University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/mill17586

Moeller, Hans-Georg. 2009. The Moral Fool: A Case for Amorality. New York. Columbia University Press.

———. 2015. “Basic Aspects of Daoist Philosophy.” International Communication of Chinese Culture 2 (2): 99–107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40636-015-0019-9

Needham, Joseph. 1956. “Science and Civilization in China, vol. II.” History and Scientific Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Nelson, Eric. S. 2009. “Responding with Dao: Early Daoist ethics and the Environment.” Philosophy East and West 59 (3): 294–316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/pew.0.0061

———. 2014. “The Human and the Inhuman: Ethics and Religion in the Zhuangzi.” The Journal of Chinese Philosophy 41 (S1): 723–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6253.12143

———. 2020. Daoism and Environmental Philosophy: Nourishing Life. New York: Routledge.

Paper, Jordan. 2001. “Chinese Religion, ‘Daoism’, and Deep Ecology”. In Deep Ecology and World Religions: New Essays on Sacred Ground, edited by David Landis Barnhill, and Roger S. Gottlieb, 107–25. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Parkes, Graham. 1983. “The Wandering Dance: Chuang Tzu and Zarathustra.” Philosophy East and West. 33 (3): 235–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1398826

Peerenboom, Randall P. 1991. “Beyond Naturalism: A Reconstruction of Daoist Environmental Ethics.” Environmental Ethics 13 (1): 3–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics199113119

———. 1993. Law and Morality in Ancient China: The Silk Manuscripts of HuangLao. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Rapp, John A. 2012. Daoism and Anarchism: Critiques of State Autonomy in Ancient and Modern China. London, New York: Continuum. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781501306778

Schipper, Kristofer. 1994. The Taoist Body. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.

Schwartz, Benjamin I. 1985. The World of Thought in Ancient China. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press. An Imprint of Harvard University Press.

Slingerland, Edward. 2003. Effortless Action: Wu-wei as Conceptual Metaphor and Spiritual Ideal in Early China. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/cri.2004.0069

Tadd, Misha. 2019. “Ziran: Authenticity or Authority?” Religion 10 (3):1–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10030207

Tucker, Mary E., and John A. Grim. 1994. Worldviews and Ecology. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.

Van Brakel, Jaap. 2014. “Heidegger on Zhuangzi and Uselessness Illustrating Preconditions of Comparative Philosophy.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 41 (3–4): 387–409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6253.12111

Waley, Arthur. 1958. The Way and Its Power: A Study of the Tao Te Ching and its Place in Chinese Thought. New York: Grove Press.

Wang, Ming 王明, ed. 2014. Taipingjing hejiao太平經合校 (The Scripture on Great Peace: Editing and Proofreading). Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.

Watson, Burton.1968. The Complete Works of Chuang Tzu. New York: Columbia University Press.

Wu, John. C. H., trans. 2006. Tao The Ching. New York: Shambhala.

Zhang, Jiyu. 2001. “A Declaration of the Chinese Daoist Association on Global Ecology.” Translated by David Yu. In Daoism and Ecology, edited by N. J. Girardot, James Miller, and Liu Xiaogan, 361–72. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

16.05.2023

How to Cite

Zhang, E. Y. (2023). The “Greening” of Daoism: Potential and Limits. Asian Studies, 11(2), 69–94. https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2023.11.2.69-94