Perspectives on Chinese, Buddhist, and Environmental Philosophy

Introduction

Authors

  • Eric S. NELSON Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2023.11.2.7-11

Keywords:

environmental ethics, critical theory, environment, Chinese and intercultural philosophy

Abstract

Appeals to the significance of a culture, tradition, or way of life can simultaneously edify and alienate different audiences as they serve an identity-forming and other-excluding function. The imaginary that some cultures are civilized and complex and others natural and simple has been complexly mediated through the historical entanglements and interactions between, on the one hand, colonialism and Eurocentrism and, on the other, varieties of anti-colonial resistance and the postcolonial formation of contemporary national, cultural, and religious identities. It is in this context that claims of the ostensible intrinsic naturalness and “greenness” of a culture or tradition are perceived and debated.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arendt, Hannah. 2013. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Chang, Carson [Zhang, Junmai]. 1962. The Development of Neo-Confucian Thought, vol. 2. New York: Bookman Associates.

Nelson, Eric S. 2021. Daoism and Environmental Philosophy: Nourishing Life. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429399145

———. 2020. Levinas, Adorno, and the Ethics of the Material Other. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Downloads

Published

16. 05. 2023

How to Cite

Nelson, Eric S. 2023. “Perspectives on Chinese, Buddhist, and Environmental Philosophy: Introduction”. Asian Studies 11 (2): 7-11. https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2023.11.2.7-11.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 299

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.