Dissolution of the Self
Digital Technology, Privacy and Intimacy in Europe and the Sinophone Regions
Keywords:digital technology, humanism, human self, personhood, privacy, intimacy
This article explores the connection between digital technology and privacy and intimacy in Europe and the Sinophone regions, with a particular focus on the changing role and constitution of human personhood. It argues that digital technology has fundamentally altered the ways in which individuals construct and maintain their personal boundaries, resulting in the erosion of traditional notions of the human self. Through an analysis of cultural and historical factors, the article demonstrates how this phenomenon manifests itself differently in Europe and mainland China, Hong Kong and Taiwan respectively, highlighting the specific challenges and opportunities that arise in each context. The article also considers the cultural differences between the European and Chinese cultures regarding privacy and intimacy, and the ways in which digital technology has amplified these differences. It argues that while digital technology has created new opportunities for connection and intimacy, it has also exposed individuals to new risks and vulnerabilities, including the loss of privacy and the erosion of selfhood.
Overall, the article aims to contribute to our understanding of the cultural and social implications of digital technology. It highlights the need for a more nuanced approach to the regulation of digital technology, one that takes into account cultural differences and the complex ways in which technology is reshaping our sense of self and our relationships with others.
Arendt, Hannah. 1998. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cao, Jingchun. 2005. “Protecting the Right to Privacy in China.” Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 645. Accessed December 12, 2020. http://www5.austlii.edu.au/nz/journals/VUWLawRw/2005/25.html#fnB6.
Chen, Zhen Troy, and Cheung Ming. 2018. “Privacy Perception and Protection on Chinese Social Media: A Case Study of WeChat.” Ethics and Information Technology 20: 279‒89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9480-6.
Delakorda Kawashima, Tinka. 2022. “The Relationless Japanese Society and the Practices of Belonging During the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Asian Studies 10 (1): 45‒68. https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2022.10.1.45-68.
DIGI+ Taiwan. To Accelerate Industrial Innovation, to Create Smart Taiwan. Accessed April 9, 2023. https:/digi.taiwan.gov.tw/#vision.
Dunker, Anders. 2020. “On Technodiversity: A Conversation with Yuk Hui.” Los Angeles Review of Books, June 9, 2020: 1–23. Accessed October 20, 2020. https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/on-technodiversity-a-conversation-with-yuk-hui.
Gerstein, Robert S. 1978. “Intimacy and Privacy.” Ethics 89 (1): 76–81.
Glare, Peter G. W., ed. 1983. Oxford Latin Dictionary. Oxford (USA): Oxford University Press.
Guangyun 廣韻. s.d. (Broad Rhymes). Chinese Text Project. Accessed March 12, 2023. https://ctext.org/dictionary.pl?if=en&char=%E7%A7%81.
Guanzi 管子. s.d. Chinese Text Project. Accessed December 13, 2020. https://ctext.org/guanzi.
Ito-Morales, Kyoko. 2022. “Individual Rights vs. Common Good? A Case Study on Japanese Self-Restraint (jishuku) and COVID-19.” Asian Studies 10 (1): 69‒95. https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2022.10.1.69-95.
Kim, Tammy. 2020. “Audrey Tang on Her ‘Conservative-Anarchist’ Vision for Taiwan’s Future.” In Rest or World – Reporting Global Tech Stories, September 29, 2020, 1–14. Accessed December 12, 2020. https://restofworld.org/2020/audrey-tang-the-conservative-anarchist/.
Kos, Janko. 1995. Na poti v postmoderno. Ljubljana: Literarno-umetniško društvo.
Kostka, Genia. 2019. “China’s Social Credit Systems and Public Opinion: Explaining High Levels of Approval.” New Media and Society 21(7): 1565–93.
Li ji 禮記. s.d. Chinese Text Project. Accessed August 3, 2020. http://ctext.org/liji.
Luhmann, Niklas. 1982. Liebe als Passion: Zur Kodierung von Intimität. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkampf.
Lunyu (The Analects) 論語. s.d. Chinese Text Project. Accessed June 7, 2020. https://ctext.org/analects.
Lyotard, Jean-François. 1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Translated by Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
–––––. 1991. The Inhuman—Reflections on Time. Translated by Geoffrey Bennington and Rachel Bowlby. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Mengzi 孟子. s.d. Chinese Text Project. Accessed June 15, 2020. https://ctext.org/mengzi.
Pagallo, Ugo, and Massimo Durante. 2014. “Legal Memories and the Right to Be Forgotten.” In Protection of Information and the Right to Privacy—A New Equilibrium?, edited by Luciano Floridi, 17–30. New York, Dordrecht, London: Springer.
Philipp, Otto, Valie Djordjevic, Jana Maire, Tom Hirche, Eike Gräf, and Henry Steinhau. 2017. “Das Sphärenmodell zur Bemessung von Persönlichkeitsrechtsverletzungen.” BPB, March 17, 2017. Accessed December 12, 2020. https://www.bpb.de/gesellschaft/digitales/persoenlichkeitsrechte/244835/sphaerenmodell.
Picerni, Federico. 2022. “‘Poets, What Can We Do?’: Pandemic Poetry in China’s Mobilization Against COVID-19”. Asian Studies 10 (1): 123‒53. https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2022.10.1.123-153.
Rošker, Jana S. 2022. “COVID-19, Digital Tracking Control and Chinese Cosmotechnology.” Asian Studies 10 (1): 345-69. https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2022.10.1.345-369.
–––––. 2023a. Confucian Relationism and Global Ethics: Alternative Models of Ethics and Axiology in Times of Global Crises. Leiden: Brill.
–––––. 2023b. “A Post-Marxian Dialogue on the Subject-Object Relation: Li Zehou and Adorno on the Dialectics of Aesthetic Subjectivity.” In The Philosopher Li Zehou: Essays Honoring his Legacy, edited by Jana S. Rošker, and Roger T. Ames. New York: SUNY (forthcoming).
Santor, Giovanni. 2014. “The Right to Be Forgotten: Dynamics of Privacy and Publicity.” In Protection of Information and the Right to Privacy—A New Equilibrium? edited by Luciano Floridi, 1–15. New York Dordrecht London: Springer.
Sernelj, Téa. 2022. “Anxiety, ‘Concerned Consciousness’ and Their Manifestation in the COVID-19 Pandemic in China.” Asian Studies 10 (1): 155‒82. https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2022.10.1.155-182.
Shuo Wen Jie Zi 說文解字. s.d. “Explaining Simple and Analyzing Compound Characters).” In Chinese Text Project, edited by Xu Shen 徐慎. Accessed March 12, 2023. https://ctext.org/shuo-wen-jie-zi.
Stiegler, Bernard. 2013. What Makes Life Worth Living—On Pharmacology. Translated by Daniel Ross. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Tang, Chih-Chieh. 2020. “Public and Private in China and the West: A Preliminary Observation on the Interaction between Semantics and Societal Structures.” Taipei: Academia Sinica, 1–39. Accessed December 13, 2020. https://www.academia.edu/11917208/Public_and_Private_in_China_and_the_West_A_Preliminary_Observation_on_the_Interaction_between_Semantics_and_Societal_Structures.
Tang, Shengming, and Dong Xiaoping. 2006. “‘Parents’ and Children’s Perceptions of Privacy Rights in China: A Cohort Comparison.” Journal of Family Issues 27 (3): 285–300.
Wang, C. Jason, Chun Y. Ng, and Robert H. Brook. 2020. “Response to COVID-19 in Taiwan: Big Data Analytics, New Technology, and Proactive Testing.” Jama 323 (14): 1341‒42.
Warren, Samuel D. & Brandeis, Louis D. 1890. “The Right to Privacy.” Harvard Law Review 4 (5): 193–220.
Wu, Huizhong. 2020. “In Land of Big Data, China Sets Individual Privacy Rights.” Technology News, May 22, 2020. Accessed December 12, 2020. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-parliament-lawmaking-privacy-idUSKBN2320EF.
Zhang, Qianfan. 2016. Human Dignity in Classical Chinese Philosophy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Zhao, Xiaopeng. 2015. Die rechtliche Regulierung der Menschenfleischsuche im Internet: Eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung zwischen Deutschland und China. Berlin: Peter Lang.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2023 Jana S. Rošker
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitting article, which will be published (print and online) in journal Asian Studies by Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, Aškerčeva 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). Author’s name will be evident in the article in journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in hands of the publisher.
- Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.