On Small and Large Vessels

Anthropological Difference according to Matteo Ricci and Zhu Xi

Authors

  • Mateusz JANIK Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Political Studies, Warsaw, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2023.11.3.275-291

Keywords:

anthropological difference, Zhu Xi, Matteo Ricci, Neo-Confucianism, Jesuit acccomodationism, non-human

Abstract

The following paper offers a comparative study of Song Neo-Confucian and late Ming Jesuit arguments on the exceptionality of human beings and the role played by non-human others in the process of producing the discursive premises of the anthropological difference. It focuses on the arguments made by Zhu Xi (朱熹, 1130‒1200) and Matteo Ricci (1552‒1610) in favour of a claim that there is something particular about being human. Its historical premise is that the Jesuit missionary activity in China resulted in a peculiar encounter between the scholastic tradition, based on Aristotle’s philosophy, and Confucian teachings. In case of Chinese as well as Western philosophical discourse, the figure of the non-human other has played an important role in establishing the very meaning of being human.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agamben, Giorgio. 2004. The Open: Man and Animal. Redwood City: Stanford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804767064

Analects. 2003. Translated by Edward Slingerland. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

Back, Youngsun. 2018. “Are Animals Moral? Zhu Xi and Jeong Yakyong’s Views on Nonhuman Animals.” Asian Philosophy 28 (2): 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/09552367.2018.1453234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09552367.2018.1453234

Braidotti, Rosi. 2013. The Posthuman. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Canaris, Daniel. 2019. “The Tianzhu Shilu Revisited: China’s First Window into Western Scholasticism.” Frontiers of Philosophy in China 14 (2): 201–25. https://doi.org/10.3868/s030-008-019-0013-7.

D’Ambrosio, Paul J. 2022. “Non-Humans in the Zhuangzi: Animalism and Anti-Anthropocentrism.” Asian Philosophy 32 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09552367.2021.1934218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09552367.2021.1934218

Glock, Hans-Johann. 2012. “The Anthropological Difference: What Can Philosophers Do to Identify the Differences Between Human and Non-Human Animals?” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements 70 (July): 105–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246112000069. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246112000069

Gross, Aaron S., Aaron Gross, Anne Vallely, and Jonathan Safran Foer. 2012. Animals and the Human Imagination: A Companion to Animal Studies. New York: Columbia University Press.

Grusin, Richard A., and Richard Grusin. 2015. The Nonhuman Turn. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Huang, Zongxi. 2007. Songyuan xue’an 宋元学案 (Scholarly Annals for Song and Yuan), vol. 2 of 4 vols. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.

Janik, Mateusz. 2022. “Imagining Immanent Causality: Depictions of Neo-Confucian and Spinozist Monism in the Works of Matteo Ricci and Pierre Bayle.” Philosophy East and West 72 (1): 118–38. https://doi.org/10.1353/pew.0.0206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/pew.2022.0005

Longobardi, Niccolò. 2021. A Brief Response on the Controversies over Shangdi, Tianshen and Linghun. Translated by Thierry Meynard and Daniel Canaris. Berlin: Springer Nature (electronic edition).

Lynn, Richard John, trans. 1999. The Classic of the Way and Virtue. New York: Columbia University Press.

———. 2019. “Birds and Beasts in the Zhuangzi, Fables Interpreted by Guo Xiang and Cheng Xuanying.” Religions 10 (7): 445. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10070445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10070445

Mencius. 2011. Translated by Philip J. Ivanhoe. New York: Columbia University Press.

Møllgaard, Eske. 2010. “Confucianism as Anthropological Machine.” Asian Philosophy 20 (2): 127–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/09552367.2010.484950. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09552367.2010.484950

Nappi, Carla. 2012. “On Yeti and Being Just: Carving the Borders of Humanity in Early Modern China.” In Animals and the Human Imagination: A Companion to Animal Studies, edited by Aaron Gross, and Anne Vallely, 55–78. New York: Columbia University Press.

Ricci, Matteo. 2016. Tianzhu shiyi 天主實義 (The True Meaning of the Lord of Heaven). Translated by Lancashire Douglas, and Hu Kuo-chen Peter. Boston: Institute of Jesuit Sources.

Steiner, Gary. 2010. Anthropocentrism and Its Discontents: The Moral Status of Animals in the History of Western Philosophy. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Sterckx, Roel. 2012. Animal and the Daemon in Early China. New York: State University of New York Press.

Tan, Jie. 2014. Tianzhu shiyi jinzhu 天主實義今注 (The True Meaning of the Lord of Heaven with Modern Commentary). Beijing: Commercial Press.

Tu, Wei-ming. 1971. “The Neo-Confucian Concept of Man.” Philosophy East and West 21 (1): 79–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1397766

Yang Xiong. 2013. Exemplary Figures / Fayan. Translated by Michael Nylan. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

Zhu, Xi. 2002a. Zhuxi quanshu 朱熹全書 (Complete Works of Zhu Xi), vol. 5 of 27 vols. Shanghai: Shanghai Classics Publishing House.

———. 2002b. Zhuxi quanshu 朱熹全書 (Complete Works of Zhu Xi), vol. 6 of 27 vols. Shanghai: Shanghai Classics Publishing House.

———. 2002c. Zhuxi quanshu 朱熹全書 (Complete Works of Zhu Xi), vol. 15 of 27 vols. Shanghai: Shanghai Classics Publishing House.

Downloads

Published

7. 09. 2023

How to Cite

Janik, Mateusz. 2023. “On Small and Large Vessels: Anthropological Difference According to Matteo Ricci and Zhu Xi”. Asian Studies 11 (3): 275-91. https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2023.11.3.275-291.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 165

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.