On Philosophy as Living

Xinxue and the Infinity of the Individual

Authors

  • Timo ENNEN Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2024.12.2.95-113

Keywords:

intercultural philosophy, comparative philosophy, infinity, individuality, xinxue, Lu Jiuyuan, Wang Yangming

Abstract

This paper considers what it would mean to conceive of philosophy as living. In the first part, by way of a discussion on intercultural encounter recently taken up by Cora Diamond, I first illustrate why philosophical conflict cannot be resolved within already given modes of thought or self-contained finite philosophical traditions, but instead transcends those. In the second part, I show why this dynamic plays out not only between cultures but also between the individual and that individual’s own tradition. I do this by drawing from insights of the two major proponents of xinxue 心學 (Learning of the Heart-Mind), Lu Jiuyuan 陸九淵 and Wang Yangming 王陽明. The way xinxue deals with both orthodox and heterodox traditions illuminates how we can understand philosophy as something living. It is neither self-contained and indifferent to its own heritage or to the culturally alien, nor does it consist of the mere accumulation of diverse philosophical contents. The deepening of individuality that xinxue introduces into Chinese philosophy consists in the relation of the individual to what has already been conceived. Ultimately, by grasping this dynamic that happens through the individual, we may better grasp why philosophy is not reducible to given modes of thought nor to self-contained finite philosophical traditions, but instead is infinite.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anscombe, G. E. M. 1981 [1975]. “The First Person.” Reprinted in Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Mind: Collected Papers, vol. II, 21–36. Oxford: Blackwell.

Chan, Wing-Tsit, trans. and comp. 2008. A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Chang, Carsun (Zhang Junmai 張君勱). 1962. Wang Yang-ming: Idealist Philosopher of Sixteenth-Century China. New York: St. John’s University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/597686

Chang, Tzu-li. 2015. “Personal Identity, Moral Agency and Liangzhi: A Comparative Study of Korsgaard and Wang Yangming.” Comparative Philosophy 6 (1): 3–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31979/2151-6014(2015).060105

Diamond, Cora. 2013. “Criticising from ‘Outside’.” Philosophical Investigations 36 (2): 114–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/phin.12000

Evans-Pritchard, Edward E. 1976 [1937]. Witchcraft, Oracles and Magic Among the Azande. Abridged and edited by Eva Gillies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Haddock, Adrian. 2019. “Disjunctivism, Skepticism, and the First Person.” In New Issues in Epistemological Disjunctivism, edited by Casey Doyle, Joseph Milburn, and Duncan Pritchard, 259–78. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315106243-13

Hegel, G. W. F. 2018. The Phenomenology of Spirit. Translated by Terry Pinkard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Husserl, Edmund. 1970. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.

Lau, D. C., trans. 2003. Mencius: A Bilingual Edition. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.

Lau, Kwok-Ying. 2016. Phenomenology and Intercultural Understanding: Toward a New Cultural Flesh. Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44764-3

Lu, Jiuyuan 陸九淵. 1980. Lu Jiuyuan Ji 陆九渊集 (The Collected Works of Lu Jiuyuan). Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.

Ma, Lin, and Jaap van Brakel. 2016. Fundamentals of Comparative and Intercultural Philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781438460178

Nelson, Eric S. 2019. Chinese and Buddhist Philosophy in Early Twentieth Century German Thought. London: Bloomsbury.

Rošker, Jana S. 2021. Interpreting Chinese Philosophy: A New Methodology. London; New York: Bloomsbury Academic. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350199897

Sider, Theodore. 2011. Writing the Book of the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199697908.001.0001

Wang, Yangming. 1963. Instructions for Practical Living and Other Neo-Confucian Writings. Translated by Wing-tsit Chan. New York: Columbia University Press.

———. 1992. “Nian pu 年谱 (Chronology).” In Wang Yangming Quanji Juan Sanshiwu 王阳明全集卷三十五 (The Complete Works of Wang Yangming, vol. 35). Shanghai: Shanghai guji chubanshe.

Weber, Ralph. 2014. “Comparative Philosophy and the Tertium: Comparing What with What, and in What Respect?” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 13 (2): 151–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-014-9368-z

Winch, Peter. 1964. “Understanding a Primitive Society.” American Philosophical Quarterly 1 (4): 307–24.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1980. Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology, vol. I. Edited by G. E. M. Anscombe, and G. H. von Wright and translated by G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.

Wong, David B. 2002. “Reasons and Analogical Reasoning in Mengzi.” In Essays on the Moral Philosophy of Mengzi, edited by Liu Xiaogan, and Philip J. Ivanhoe, 187–220. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

Zhang, Xuezhi. 2021. History of Chinese Philosophy in the Ming Dynasty. Singapore: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8963-8

Zhao, Dongming. 2015. “Neo-Confucian Theory of Mind as a Discourse of the Infinite: The Lu-Wang School.” Frontiers of Philosophy in China 10 (1): 75–94.

Zheng, Zemian. 2021. “Wang Yangming, Descartes, and the Sino-European Juncture of Enlightenment.” Asian Philosophy 31 (3): 336–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09552367.2021.1919368

Downloads

Published

6. 05. 2024

How to Cite

Ennen, Timo. 2024. “On Philosophy As Living: Xinxue and the Infinity of the Individual”. Asian Studies 12 (2): 95-113. https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2024.12.2.95-113.